Pedagogy:DOCC: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
link to full Pedagogy group |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Project to develop a digital library pedagogy [http://femtechnet.org/docc DOCC (distributed open collaborative course)] | Project to develop a digital library pedagogy [http://femtechnet.org/docc DOCC (distributed open collaborative course)], as part of the DLF [[Pedagogy | Digital Library Pedagogy Group]] | ||
=== Audience? === | === Audience? === | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 7 February 2017
Project to develop a digital library pedagogy DOCC (distributed open collaborative course), as part of the DLF Digital Library Pedagogy Group
Audience?
- People who are interested in teaching with digital collections, such as:
- Digital librarians
- DS/DH librarians
- RIS librarians
- Digital scholars & digital humanists
- ‘Digital curious’ teaching faculty
- Library admins
- College admins
- DS/DH center admins (especially those outside libraries)
Potential course content
- Creating primary source sets for community syllabi like the #blackpanthersyllabus
- Creating primary source sets
- Course & syllabus design (see working lunch discussion)
Potential partners or key faculty members
- Pedagogy experts
- Digital collections experts
- People who’ve done it (what went well, what crashed & burned)
- One-off vs. class
- Small college vs. R1
Potential course activities
- Creating curricular material as OERs — “teaching as an open workflow"
- Contributing materials to Project CORA or Humanities Commons or #DLFteach wiki or DLF OSF
Defining 'open' for this DOCC
- Conversations in ‘all may come’ but private spaces, which in turn can generate open materials?
- Not making participants list public? Opt in rather than opt out?
Who’s coordinating?
- Elizabeth Gibes (Marquette University)
- Chelcie Rowell (Boston College)