NDSA:Membership

This version of the Membership Model was crafted after reviewing minutes of the meeting and trying to consolidate all of the concerns and wishes expressed at the December meeting. We propose what we believe is a workable model that will address the desires of many to be open, inclusive and diverse. We have looked to the membership information that DPC provides for inspiration about how to be inclusive of commercial/IT vendors and international affiliates, and have borrowed some of their language with their permission.

Although there was some discussion at the December meeting about a formal application review and a process for that, we are at this point recommending that we keep it lightweight and have the Secretariat review and process applications, particularly with this more open model where we are allowing for all to apply.

We heard at the December meeting some of the positives of going with this approach:

• “NDSA is not a club” – speaks to the inclusiveness we encourage in our values statement.
• Open, broad membership is a benefit: offers a variety of experiences, knowledge. Access to high-tech and international members benefits us all. Brings in stakeholders that could inspire innovation.
• Any size institution may participate.
• Without need to have CC or a membership committee review and vote on new members, members could join at any time (LC could just process as they come in).
• Encourages members to recruit new members, to think broadly about who might be encouraged to join.
• This model allows for us to develop clearly stated “we share common values across boundaries” with international organizations and high tech companies and others who may not meet full eligibility requirements.
• Brings in subject matter experts and specialists that would otherwise not be able to participate “officially.”
• No perception of favoritism because we aren’t inviting or sponsoring others to join. A membership rubric will clearly define what is “a demonstrated commitment to digital preservation.” [keeping this in? see below - we would need to develop that rubric still]
• Clearly defines what the eligibility for international and commercial vendors memberships and expectations for membership.

Term of Membership

Membership expires December 31, 2013. [i changed this from 3 years to the specific date, so we don't have rolling membership and everyone renews all at once =ok?]

Recommendations for Membership

• Membership will be at the institutional level, but participation on Working Groups is open to one or more individual participants at the institution.
• Applications are welcome from consortia, given that there is a clear representative identified to participate from the consortia.
• Applications are welcome from commercial companies and IT vendors, given that these members agree to the values of the NDSA and understand that the NDSA requires all members to follow rules of neutrality. We recommend using language modeled after the DPC's information for Commercial and IT vendors in our membership materials, and to have language that encourages technically-oriented rather than sales staff serve as NDSA participants.
• International Organizations will have Affiliate status rather than full membership. (see below for different rights and privileges)
• Membership should be open and the process by which new members can join is though:
  • Application process
  • Review and Processing by Secretariat

Eligibility

• Members should have demonstrated a commitment to digital preservation. [do we still need this language and the rubric if we are doing all open membership? in the above I kept in the language about it so maybe we should? I took out the part about membership committee] A clearly-defined rubric will be made available on the NDSA website.
• Members should share the stated values of the Alliance.
• Members should agree to maintain vendor neutrality.
• Members should agree to participate in one or more working groups.

Rights and Privileges

Full Members

• Members will have one vote on organizational and governance matters affecting the Alliance, e.g. voting for coordinating committee nominees, regardless of how many participants they contribute to the NDSA.
• Individual participants will have effective decision-making power at the Working Group level, e.g. deciding on work plans and work products.
• Members may send representatives to participate in NDSA annual meetings.[is this what we are calling them?]

Affiliate Members

• Member organizations may send representatives to participate in the annual meetings of the NDSA, but do not have voting powers.
• Members may participate in the work of the Working Groups at the Action Team level. [does this mean they can't help drive the work of the WGs? do we need to state that?]