NDSA:I can haz standards workshop notes: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
Possible use cases:
Possible use cases:
Digital preservation policy
Digital preservation policy
Education/Training
Education/Training
Developing funding proposals/research
Developing funding proposals/research
Funding organizations
Reformatting community: analog to digital
Reformatting community: analog to digital
Data migration
Data migration
Adoption patterns/community
Adoption patterns/community
New standards development
New standards development
Gap analysis for developing new standards
Gap analysis for developing new standards
Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool.
Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool.
Tool developers
Software tool developers
Funding organizations
 
Procurement process mandate use of open standards  
 
Procurement process (which might mandate use of open standards)
 
History of digital standards
History of digital standards
Avoiding redoing existing work
Avoiding redoing existing work



Revision as of 14:24, 21 July 2011

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

Should only list institutions that are currently using the standard

Who will maintain this? crowd? or one institution?

Is it important to know who's using the standard?

Do we purge old versions of standards - standards no one is using? (can "dead" stuff go to a separate place)

Would use this as a tool to see what exists and who is using/doing what?

"this is a project that sounds like ours and this is what they're using?" - would mean that we have to be able to search by organization

Be able to search by type of material - "x is doing y - I'm also doing y...."

Take a look at the IU - Jen Riley's metadata organization model

Relational database of some kind - LibraryThing is something we should look at. Some fields that the general user can input and others are protected

We should take a look at WordPress

Talk to Jack Brighton about Expression Engine

Table 3

Possible use cases: Digital preservation policy

Education/Training

Developing funding proposals/research

Funding organizations

Reformatting community: analog to digital

Data migration

Adoption patterns/community

New standards development

Gap analysis for developing new standards

Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool. Software tool developers


Procurement process (which might mandate use of open standards)

History of digital standards

Avoiding redoing existing work

Possibly add to survey: related projects

Big issues around presentation and data input for group; usefulness Depends on content staying current

Table 4

test

-- scope: descriptive? standards / guidelines / practices

-- use cases: newbie, student, new project planners, hardware purchase decisions; developers; preparing outsource specification

-- difficulty to maintain over time? distributed mode with editor? Regular request to community for updates?

-- standards in use around table: METS, PREMIS, ASE, DACS, EAD, PeDALS; Astronomy FITS; RDF;

-- what about file format standards? what about best practices for preservation and access?

-- Questions: need more use cases to justify? What about standards and practices still needed? Gap analysis?

-- use format / community-based, investigation / organization

Table 5

1. Software developers -Just need minimal information - titles, links, maybe tags -goal - need to work in aoarticular problem. Space

Useful to know if the standard is dead, still used

2. Tools Google fusion tables Freebase?