NDSA:December 16, 2013 Standards and Practices Working Group Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Repository infrastructure and tools | * Repository infrastructure and tools | ||
** Specific tools: BagIt (LC, Georgetown Law) | ** Specific tools: BagIt (LC, Georgetown Law, ITHAKA) | ||
** Specific repository platforms: Fedora | ** Specific repository platforms: Fedora | ||
** Understanding/surveying an institution's complex repository landscape (Cornell, Harvard) | ** Understanding/surveying an institution's complex repository landscape (Cornell, Harvard) | ||
** Software development (LC) | ** Software development (LC) | ||
** Workflows (University of Minnesota, Columbia) | |||
* Assessments/audits/certifications | * Assessments/audits/certifications | ||
** Repository assessments (Harvard) | ** Repository assessments and audits (Harvard,ITHAKA, ICPSR) | ||
** Levels of Digital Preservation (Harvard, Cornell) | ** Specific models: | ||
*** Levels of Digital Preservation (Harvard, Cornell, ICPSR) | |||
*** Data Seal of Approval (ICPSR) | |||
* Content and metadata packages | * Content and metadata packages | ||
** Packaging forms/SIP components (MXF AS-07, METS)(LC, Harvard, Georgetown Law, Cornell) | ** Packaging forms/SIP components/metadata (MXF AS-07, METS)(LC, Harvard, Georgetown Law, Cornell, ITHAKA, NARA) | ||
** Transfer between repositories | ** Transfer between repositories (ITHAKA) | ||
** Identifiers (ITHAKA) | |||
* Techniques | * Techniques and practices | ||
** Fixity checking (LC) | ** Fixity checking (LC) | ||
** digital forensics (Georgetown Law) | ** digital forensics (Georgetown Law) | ||
** Participating on standards bodies (LC) | |||
* Formats | * Formats | ||
** Format assessment (LC, Harvard, Record labels?) | ** Format assessment (LC, Harvard, Record labels?) | ||
** Format guidelines/requirements (for creation, digitization, transfer)(Georgetown Law, Cornell) | ** Format guidelines/requirements (for creation, digitization, transfer)(Georgetown Law, Cornell, University of Minnesota, Harvard, NARA) | ||
** Particular genres and categories of formats | ** Particular genres and categories of formats | ||
*** video (LC, Harvard) | *** video (LC, Harvard, Columbia, ICPSR) | ||
*** born-digital (LC) | *** born-digital (LC, Columbia) | ||
*** email (LC) | *** email (LC, Columbia) | ||
*** databases | *** databases (Columbia) | ||
*** PDF/A (LC) | |||
* Engagement with "users" (curators, content creators) (LC, Cornell) | * Other topics | ||
** Engagement with "users" (curators, content creators) (LC, Cornell) | |||
** Adequately resourcing programs (Cornell, Boston University) |
Revision as of 11:24, 6 December 2013
New Members
Project Status
"What are you working on" -- Roundtable Discussion (continued)
Common Themes from our Roundtable Discussion
- Repository infrastructure and tools
- Specific tools: BagIt (LC, Georgetown Law, ITHAKA)
- Specific repository platforms: Fedora
- Understanding/surveying an institution's complex repository landscape (Cornell, Harvard)
- Software development (LC)
- Workflows (University of Minnesota, Columbia)
- Assessments/audits/certifications
- Repository assessments and audits (Harvard,ITHAKA, ICPSR)
- Specific models:
- Levels of Digital Preservation (Harvard, Cornell, ICPSR)
- Data Seal of Approval (ICPSR)
- Content and metadata packages
- Packaging forms/SIP components/metadata (MXF AS-07, METS)(LC, Harvard, Georgetown Law, Cornell, ITHAKA, NARA)
- Transfer between repositories (ITHAKA)
- Identifiers (ITHAKA)
- Techniques and practices
- Fixity checking (LC)
- digital forensics (Georgetown Law)
- Participating on standards bodies (LC)
- Formats
- Format assessment (LC, Harvard, Record labels?)
- Format guidelines/requirements (for creation, digitization, transfer)(Georgetown Law, Cornell, University of Minnesota, Harvard, NARA)
- Particular genres and categories of formats
- video (LC, Harvard, Columbia, ICPSR)
- born-digital (LC, Columbia)
- email (LC, Columbia)
- databases (Columbia)
- PDF/A (LC)
- Other topics
- Engagement with "users" (curators, content creators) (LC, Cornell)
- Adequately resourcing programs (Cornell, Boston University)