NDSA:DDP OAIS Gap-Uses: Difference between revisions
Matt.schultz (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (7 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Gap Analysis & Use Cases== | ==Gap Analysis & Use Cases== | ||
This is a workspace for distributed digital preservation groups to self-describe their orientation to the various Archive Interoperability models described in Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model, as well as to OAIS in general (terminology, concepts, functional areas, roles & responsibilities, etc.). | This is a workspace for distributed digital preservation groups to self-describe their orientation to the various Archive Interoperability models described in Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model, as well as to OAIS in general (terminology, concepts, functional areas, roles & responsibilities, etc.). Its primary purpose is to identify important elements that could be elaborated upon to help describe a framework for effectively applying the OAIS Reference Model and derived auditing metrics such as TRAC to these groups and environments. | ||
This gap analysis and set of use cases can then be drawn upon to articulate the proposed white paper, and lay the groundwork for finalizing a more complete and accurate [[NDSA:DDP_OAIS_Frameworks | Framework for Applying OAIS to Distributed Digital Preservation]]. | This gap analysis and set of use cases can then be drawn upon to articulate the proposed white paper, and lay the groundwork for finalizing a more complete and accurate [[NDSA:DDP_OAIS_Frameworks | Framework for Applying OAIS to Distributed Digital Preservation]]. | ||
===Gap Analysis=== | ===Gap Analysis=== | ||
A list of distributed digital preservation groups, projects, service providers or practitioners describing their environment's orientation to Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model: Archive Interoperability. | A list of distributed digital preservation groups, projects, service providers or practitioners describing their environment's orientation to Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model: Archive Interoperability. See [[NDSA:Archive_Interoperability | here]] for Section 6 OAIS descriptions of [[NDSA:Archive_Interoperability#Independent_Archives_.28page_6-2.2C_2009_Pink_Book.29 | Independent]], [[NDSA:Archive_Interoperability#Cooperative_Archives_.28page_6-3.2C_2009_Pink_Book.29 | Cooperating]], [[NDSA:Archive_Interoperability#Federated_Archives_.28page_6-4.2C_2009_Pink_Book.29 | Federated]] and [[NDSA:Archive_Interoperability#Archives_with_Shared_Functional_Areas_.28page_6-7.2C_2009_Pink_Book.29 | Archives with Shared Functional Areas]]. | ||
* [[NDSA:MetaArchive_Gap_Analysis | MetaArchive Cooperative]] | * [[NDSA:MetaArchive_Gap_Analysis | MetaArchive Cooperative]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:18, 11 February 2016
Gap Analysis & Use Cases
This is a workspace for distributed digital preservation groups to self-describe their orientation to the various Archive Interoperability models described in Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model, as well as to OAIS in general (terminology, concepts, functional areas, roles & responsibilities, etc.). Its primary purpose is to identify important elements that could be elaborated upon to help describe a framework for effectively applying the OAIS Reference Model and derived auditing metrics such as TRAC to these groups and environments.
This gap analysis and set of use cases can then be drawn upon to articulate the proposed white paper, and lay the groundwork for finalizing a more complete and accurate Framework for Applying OAIS to Distributed Digital Preservation.
Gap Analysis
A list of distributed digital preservation groups, projects, service providers or practitioners describing their environment's orientation to Section 6 of the OAIS Reference Model: Archive Interoperability. See here for Section 6 OAIS descriptions of Independent, Cooperating, Federated and Archives with Shared Functional Areas.
Use Cases
A list of distributed digital preservation groups, projects, service providers or practitioners describing individual use case examples of applying the Reference Model and comparing/contrasting its concepts to their environment.