NDSA:Content WG July 23, 2013 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
==What are we currently doing?==
==What are we currently doing?==
   
   
* Content Teams
*Content Teams: Case Studies, Presentations
Blog Posts
*Blog Posts: Going very well
Going very well
*Web Archiving survey: Planned for Fall 2013 (follow-up to 2011 survey)
Web Archiving survey (follow-up to 2011 survey)
*Levels of Preservation document (started in the Content Group)
   
   
Levels of Preservation document (started in the Content Group)
==What should we focus on moving forward?==
   
   
III. What should we focus on moving forward?
We reviewed and discussed the survey results.
 
Productive dialogs in meetings?
How to we encourage productive dialogs in meetings?
 
Discussion of survey results
We talked about shifting to more of a discussion series, focus some meetings on the content areas in the National Agenda.
 
Discussion series
Other ideas:
 
Diagnostic tool, building a level on top of the levels of preservation/Curator View requirements documentation
'''Diagnostic tool, building a level on top of the levels of preservation/Curator View requirements documentation'''
Strategy: What kind of user stories are we creating to map to the technical implementation?  
*Strategy: What kind of user stories are we creating to map to the technical implementation?  
Example: Look at format. What is a successful preservation implementation of images. Or audio?
*Example: Look at format. What is a successful preservation implementation of images. Or audio?
Come up with requirements documents/requirements template for content managers
*Come up with requirements documents/requirements template for content managers
* Levels of Collecting grant example http://www.digitalcurationservices.org/sustaining-digital-scholarship/
*Levels of Collecting grant example http://www.digitalcurationservices.org/sustaining-digital-scholarship/
*"Curator view"
"Curator view"
*Levels for curation
Levels for curation
 
What is "at risk" content?
What is "at risk" content?
Identifying through case studies
*Identifying through case studies
Examples: News sites, ePrints
*Examples: News sites, ePrints
How to engage newer members?
 
• Member profiles
 
• Member presentations
 
How to inventory digital assets
How to inventory digital assets
   
   
How to place value on content? How to assess and articulate?
How to place value on content? How to assess and articulate?
 
Member presentations
How to engage newer members?
So that we can learn more about each other - what is your institution doing, what content do you care about?
*Member profiles
Feature in the phone call
*Member presentations
Presentations on topics in national agenda
 
Monthly phone calls
'''Member presentations'''
Challenges and roadblocks
 
Approaches
*So that we can learn more about each other - what is your institution doing, what content do you care about?
Task people with certain activities
*Feature in the phone call
Jennie will set up a Google calendar for the group (add key conferences to the Google calendar)
*Presentations on topics in national agenda
*Switch back to Monthly phone calls
*Challenges and roadblocks
'''
Approaches to Engage'''
*Task people with certain activities
*Jennie will set up a Google calendar for the group (add key conferences to the Google calendar)
Content-related award?  
Content-related award?  
Collaborative projects
*Collaborative projects
Contributor award (Content Working Group)
 
How to articulate value of content? Important for talking to administrators, technology considerations, etc.
'''
Has someone done something bold to save content?
Contributor award (Content Working Group)'''
Researcher/Scholar who uses content in a unique way
*How to articulate value of content? Important for talking to administrators, technology considerations, etc.
Local/Birds of a feather types of meetings
*Has someone done something bold to save content?
*Researcher/Scholar who uses content in a unique way
 
'''Local/Birds of a feather types of meetings'''
• MARAC meetings - Jennie can hold a meeting/gathering
• MARAC meetings - Jennie can hold a meeting/gathering
• Gatherings at SAA
• Gatherings at SAA
• Organize meetings by state/region
• Organize meetings by state/region


==Survey of Members==
==Survey of Members==

Revision as of 10:30, 29 July 2013

Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home

DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Attendees ()

Attendees

  • Abbie Grotke (Library of Congress)
  • Cathy Hartman (University of North Texas)
  • Christie Moffatt (National Library of Medicine)
  • Carolyn Caizzi (Northwestern University)
  • Jennie Knies (University of Maryland)
  • Bradley Daigle (University of Virginia)
  • Gail Truman (Truman Technology)
  • Mike Ashenfelder (Library of Congress)
  • Linda Reib (Arizona State Library, Archives)
  • Chad Garrett (University of Arkansas at Little Rock)
  • Josh Sternfeld (NEH)
  • Anne Harrison (Library of Congress)
  • Margie Maes (LIPA)
  • David Brooks (Library of Congress)
  • Rachel Wise (Harvard Business School)

What is our purpose/mission?

Understanding content, the issues related to content that we need to be thinking about. Hoping that case studies would outline types/groups of content in order to create strategies and plans of action for preserving content.

Registry of what is being preserved was an early idea, but became complicated.

One challenge is the number of types of content and how this group can divide into subgroups to do the work.

Need to understand what members of the group want from the group.

What are we currently doing?

  • Content Teams: Case Studies, Presentations
  • Blog Posts: Going very well
  • Web Archiving survey: Planned for Fall 2013 (follow-up to 2011 survey)
  • Levels of Preservation document (started in the Content Group)

What should we focus on moving forward?

We reviewed and discussed the survey results.

How to we encourage productive dialogs in meetings?

We talked about shifting to more of a discussion series, focus some meetings on the content areas in the National Agenda.

Other ideas:

Diagnostic tool, building a level on top of the levels of preservation/Curator View requirements documentation

  • Strategy: What kind of user stories are we creating to map to the technical implementation?
  • Example: Look at format. What is a successful preservation implementation of images. Or audio?
  • Come up with requirements documents/requirements template for content managers
  • Levels of Collecting grant example http://www.digitalcurationservices.org/sustaining-digital-scholarship/
  • "Curator view"
  • Levels for curation

What is "at risk" content?

  • Identifying through case studies
  • Examples: News sites, ePrints


How to inventory digital assets

How to place value on content? How to assess and articulate?

How to engage newer members?

  • Member profiles
  • Member presentations

Member presentations

  • So that we can learn more about each other - what is your institution doing, what content do you care about?
  • Feature in the phone call
  • Presentations on topics in national agenda
  • Switch back to Monthly phone calls
  • Challenges and roadblocks

Approaches to Engage

  • Task people with certain activities
  • Jennie will set up a Google calendar for the group (add key conferences to the Google calendar)

Content-related award?

  • Collaborative projects

Contributor award (Content Working Group)

  • How to articulate value of content? Important for talking to administrators, technology considerations, etc.
  • Has someone done something bold to save content?
  • Researcher/Scholar who uses content in a unique way

Local/Birds of a feather types of meetings • MARAC meetings - Jennie can hold a meeting/gathering • Gatherings at SAA • Organize meetings by state/region

Survey of Members

Survey (http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8ZZ55DJ) is still open and results were used to help with our discussion.


Next Meetings

-End-