NDSA:August 21, 2013 Meeting Minutes

Attendees

• Bailey, Jefferson, Metropolitan NY Library Council
• Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
• Hartman, Cathy | Associate Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
• McCain, Edward | University of Missouri | mccaing@missouri.edu
• McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
• McMillan, Gail | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | gailmac@vt.edu
• Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
• Rudersdorf, Amy | Digital Public Library of America | amy@dp.la
• Stoller, Michael | New York University | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
• Taylor, Nicholas | Stanford Univ. Libraries
• Wurl, Joel | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov

Agenda

Brainstorm of:

• what questions we'd like to repeat from the 2011 survey --what
• topics/issues that were brought up in survey that we might want to delve deeper into
• new questions we might ask

Discussion Notes

Kristine Hanna (IA) couldn't join us today but submitted these comments to Abbie, which she shared with group:

1) I think it would be extremely helpful to see the progress organizations have made in the last two years. Sort of a "are you better or worse off than in 2011" type of polling.

2) I keep hearing over and over gain the need to understand internal work flows, skill sets required, resources needed to initiate and sustain a web archiving program. And the answers might be different for a one person shop than with a five person team. Or they may be the same. Perhaps we could have more in depth questions around this area.

General Comments

• Michael found it comforting in reading original survey that things they were struggling with, others were struggling with too.

What to repeat

We didn't get too much into this but talked about problematic questions that we might drop or restructure for this year. Jefferson reported that in analyzing results, respondents seemed to have trouble with questions 13-15 (those about "what subjects in your archives" - we discussed possibly reformulating these questions but no solutions proposed yet. There was interest in keeping in some questions about news, media and journalism. Maybe we can tie those with policy questions regarding certain types of content?

Possible New Areas To Explore

WORKFLOWS - would be helpful to learn more about what workflows people have in place for acquisition of web content. Multiple choice might be hard; descriptive open-ended comment field?

STAFFING/SKILLSETS - All agreed that questions about staffing would be useful. Jefferson suggested we look at the infrastructure wg's staffing survey to see how they asked questions about this (full time vs part time, who is doing what? what skills do they need?

METADATA = In Q24 we ask about whether people do catalog records, but didn't get into more detail. Would be good to inquire about how you structure descriptions, what fields are used, what formats (MODS, DUBLIN CORE, etc.). What data is auto-generated/extracted from archive vs. manually created or edited? What percent of auto generated data needs to be corrected? What is the workflow for metadata creation? Are there difficulties resolving descriptions with existing standards?

Expand on topics from 2011 Survey

TOOLS (Besides crawling and access)

PRESERVATION METHODS - Glen found the section on downloading copies/transferring data (Q20) interesting, would like this asked again but also go into what preservation methods are used: checksums, validation of files, etc.

ACCESS: expand on questions