NDSA:August 18, 2014 Standards and Practices Working Group Action Items and Recording: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (16 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:20, 11 February 2016

New Member Introduction

  • Lisa Snider, Canadian Museum of Human Rights in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (@ Harry Ransom until the end of August)
  • Angelike Contis, Vermont Access Network
  • Carolyn Cox (previously Campbell) Georgetown University

Project Updates and Announcements

  • Preliminary Results Summary of the Video Deep Dive Survey
    • The survey received a total of 224 responses.
    • The blog post on The Signal was the most popular means to get the word out (27%) followed by the AMIA list (13%) and the NDSA-ALL list (11%).
    • A significant number of respondents (25%) were directed to the survey through other tools including Twitter, Facebook, PrestoCenter **Newsletter and the specially-designed bookmarks distributed at the DP14 meeting.
    • The vast majority of respondent who identified their affiliation were from the United States; other countries represented include Germany, **Austria, England, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Denmark and Chile.
    • The survey identified these as the top five stumbling blocks in preserving video:
      • Getting funding resources to start preserving video (e.g., in-house equipment and systems, staff, outsourced work) (18%)
      • Adequate digital storage capacity that can accommodate video master files (14%)
      • Locating technical guidance on video file formats in which you have sufficient confidence, whether standards or best practices (11%)
      • Repository services that facilitate active management of video (e.g., ingest, security, monitoring, fixity checks) (10%)
      • Knowing where to start with video preservation (9%)
    • Lower ranking issues include
      • Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video preservation (2.5%)
      • Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video access (2.5%)
      • Identifying or implementing technology for provisioning video access (e.g., streaming) (1.5%)
    • Issues reported as Solved at specific institutions include
      • Knowing where to start with video preservation (44%) Note that this was also listed as a Top 5 issue. This polarity is perhaps explained by the range of communities answering the survey. More mature programs are well on their way while emerging programs are looking for resources.
      • Getting management buy-in to start preserving video (41%)
      • Locating sufficient video technical expertise, whether on staff or as an outside resource (22%)
    • Respondents report that analog/physical media is the most challenging type of video (73%) followed by born digital (42%) and digital on physical media (34%).


Discussion Topic: DP14 Recap and Reflections

  • In lieu of capturing notes, the conference call audio and web interface (including chat window and participants list) were recorded.

https://locosi.adobeconnect.com/p1ffyynvljy/ (approx. 50 mins)

  • Enter passcode: NDSA


Participants:

  • Andrea Goethals, Harvard
  • Winston Atkins, Duke
  • Michelle Paolillo (Cornell)
  • John Spencer, BMS Chace
  • Midge Coates, Auburn
  • Erin Engle, LC
  • Vika Zafrin
  • Carolyn (Campbell) Cox
  • Chris Lacinak, AVPreserve
  • Meg Phillips, NARA
  • Linda Tadic, AudioVi
  • Lisa Snider
  • Josh Sternfeld, NEH
  • Felicity Dytas
  • Angelike Contis
  • Dina Sokolova
  • Mariella Soprano
  • Ricc Ferrante, SI
  • Carl Fleischhauer, LC
  • Kara Van Malssen

Action Items

  • If anyone is interested in participating in the Video Deep Dive analysis, please contact Andrea (andrea_goethals@harvard.edu) and Kate (kmur@loc.gov).
  • John S. volunteered to take notes on the next call.
  • The next call is Monday, Sept. 15, 1-2 pm ET.