NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
If you are interesting in joining this Action Team, please contact Kristine Hanna to sign up. | If you are interesting in joining this Action Team, please contact Kristine Hanna to sign up. | ||
'''First meeting (January 19)''' | |||
[[NDSA:thoughts from members who could not attend today:]] | |||
Curtis Pulford: | |||
I did want to advocate for temporal spatial data layers (particularly those the GIS community describes as ‘framework layers’) as the At Risk collection near and dear to me. I will be happy to elaborate on this at a future meeting or in writing somewhere. | |||
But the core issue is that data sets (like parcels, administrative boundaries, hydrography, transportation, etc.) are being replaced over time – without any archive. Custodians of this data are many and diverse (local, state, private) and most have no funding or mandate to store historical collections. As such, our ability to look at, or learn lessons from, our spatial data history is now (in the electronic data age) becoming impossible. People simply don’t draw maps and file them away anymore. | |||
Pat Steele: | |||
One thought I had for getting us started on this is to pilot self-nominations of collections from the community to then assess their characteristics. This might help us determine elements and lead to criteria - just a thought to get us going. | |||
Revision as of 12:40, 19 January 2011
Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home
Clearinghouse Action Team (Group B)
Description of Work
Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:
- Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.
- Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.
- Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.
At the December 8th call, it was decided that this group would start with determining what specific types of content or collections are at risk.
Action Team Members
- LEADER: Kristine Hanna, Internet Archive (kristine@archive.org)
- Michael Stoller, New York University (Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU)
- Glen McAninch, Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives (Glen.McAninch@ky.gov)
- Matt Kirschenbaum, University of Maryland (mkirschenbaum@GMAIL.COM)
- Deborah Rossum, SCOLA (drossum@SCOLA.ORG)
- Pat Steele, University of Maryland (pasteele@umd.edu)
- John Weise, University of Michigan (jweise@UMICH.EDU)
- Amy Pienta, University of Michigan/Data-PASS (apienta@umich.edu)
- Tricia Cruse, California Digital Library (patricia.cruse@ucop.edu)
- Curtis Pulford, Wisconsin Department of Administration (curtis.pulford@wisconsin.gov)
- Cathy Hartman, University of North Texas (cathy.hartman@unt.edu)
- Guest Participant: John Faundeen, US Geological Service (faundeen@usgs.gov)
If you are interesting in joining this Action Team, please contact Kristine Hanna to sign up.
First meeting (January 19)
NDSA:thoughts from members who could not attend today:
Curtis Pulford: I did want to advocate for temporal spatial data layers (particularly those the GIS community describes as ‘framework layers’) as the At Risk collection near and dear to me. I will be happy to elaborate on this at a future meeting or in writing somewhere. But the core issue is that data sets (like parcels, administrative boundaries, hydrography, transportation, etc.) are being replaced over time – without any archive. Custodians of this data are many and diverse (local, state, private) and most have no funding or mandate to store historical collections. As such, our ability to look at, or learn lessons from, our spatial data history is now (in the electronic data age) becoming impossible. People simply don’t draw maps and file them away anymore.
Pat Steele: One thought I had for getting us started on this is to pilot self-nominations of collections from the community to then assess their characteristics. This might help us determine elements and lead to criteria - just a thought to get us going.