NDSA:August 21, 2013 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
And the answers might be different for a one person shop than with a five person team. Or they may be the same. Perhaps we could have more in depth questions around this area. | And the answers might be different for a one person shop than with a five person team. Or they may be the same. Perhaps we could have more in depth questions around this area. | ||
==General Comments== | ===General Comments=== | ||
*Michael found it comforting in reading original survey that things they were struggling with, others were struggling with too. | *Michael found it comforting in reading original survey that things they were struggling with, others were struggling with too. | ||
===What to repeat=== | |||
==Possible New Areas To Explore== | We didn't get too much into this but talked about problematic questions that we might drop or restructure for this year. Jefferson reported that in analyzing results, respondents seemed to have trouble with questions 13-15 (those about "what subjects in your archives" - we discussed possibly reformulating these questions but no solutions proposed yet. There was interest in keeping in some questions about news, media and journalism. Maybe we can tie those with policy questions regarding certain types of content? | ||
===Possible New Areas To Explore=== | |||
WORKFLOWS - would be helpful to learn more about what workflows people have in place for acquisition of web content. | WORKFLOWS - would be helpful to learn more about what workflows people have in place for acquisition of web content. | ||
Multiple choice might be hard; descriptive open-ended comment field? | Multiple choice might be hard; descriptive open-ended comment field? | ||
SKILLS - | |||
STAFFING - | |||
===Expand on topics from 2011 Survey=== | |||
OTHER TOOLS (Besides crawling and access) |
Revision as of 16:49, 21 August 2013
Attendees
- Bailey, Jefferson, Metropolitan NY Library Council
- Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
- Hartman, Cathy | Associate Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
- McCain, Edward | University of Missouri | mccaing@missouri.edu
- McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
- McMillan, Gail | Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University | gailmac@vt.edu
- Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
- Rudersdorf, Amy | Digital Public Library of America | amy@dp.la
- Stoller, Michael | New York University | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
- Taylor, Nicholas | Stanford Univ. Libraries
- Wurl, Joel | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov
Agenda
Brainstorm of:
- what questions we'd like to repeat from the 2011 survey --what
- topics/issues that were brought up in survey that we might want to delve deeper into
- new questions we might ask
Discussion Notes
Kristine Hanna (IA) couldn't join us today but submitted these comments to Abbie, which she shared with group:
1) I think it would be extremely helpful to see the progress organizations have made in the last two years. Sort of a "are you better or worse off than in 2011" type of polling.
2) I keep hearing over and over gain the need to understand internal work flows, skill sets required, resources needed to initiate and sustain a web archiving program. And the answers might be different for a one person shop than with a five person team. Or they may be the same. Perhaps we could have more in depth questions around this area.
General Comments
- Michael found it comforting in reading original survey that things they were struggling with, others were struggling with too.
What to repeat
We didn't get too much into this but talked about problematic questions that we might drop or restructure for this year. Jefferson reported that in analyzing results, respondents seemed to have trouble with questions 13-15 (those about "what subjects in your archives" - we discussed possibly reformulating these questions but no solutions proposed yet. There was interest in keeping in some questions about news, media and journalism. Maybe we can tie those with policy questions regarding certain types of content?
Possible New Areas To Explore
WORKFLOWS - would be helpful to learn more about what workflows people have in place for acquisition of web content. Multiple choice might be hard; descriptive open-ended comment field?
SKILLS -
STAFFING -
Expand on topics from 2011 Survey
OTHER TOOLS (Besides crawling and access)