NDSA:May 2012: Difference between revisions
Created page with 'Meeting May 14 Cathy Abbie Abby R Michael Joel Role of the big picture group Executive committee? Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the…' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Abbie | Abbie | ||
Abby R | Abby R | ||
Michael | Michael Stoller | ||
Joel | Joel Wurl | ||
Rachel | |||
Role of the big picture group | Role of the big picture group | ||
Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams. | |||
Smaller group to take an interest - a bit of a conceptual exec. committee. Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process. | Smaller group to take an interest - a bit of a conceptual "exec. committee". Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process. | ||
Exec. committee not the right term really - concerned that wholistic view would be lost. Not a coordinating group. A group to take a look at the whole picture of content. | |||
Noticing things that the larger group may want to take on. | |||
An extra brain or eye for the group. What is the strategic vision of the group? | |||
Suggestions: | |||
Map of activities across the groups - road map | |||
Shared sense of what we're working towards - helping to frame work of this group | |||
quarterly, we could spend some time looking at what's happening, seeing where natural alliances might occur. get people to work together where they are not. | |||
Looking at where there are no activities and find out what why, | |||
each member of this group, report back? each of the big picture sign up for particular threads or groups to watch. defined areas of observation to track. | |||
meet quarterly? | |||
track things outside of NDSA | |||
Revision as of 11:13, 14 May 2012
Meeting May 14
Cathy Abbie Abby R Michael Stoller Joel Wurl Rachel
Role of the big picture group
Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.
Smaller group to take an interest - a bit of a conceptual "exec. committee". Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process.
Exec. committee not the right term really - concerned that wholistic view would be lost. Not a coordinating group. A group to take a look at the whole picture of content.
Noticing things that the larger group may want to take on.
An extra brain or eye for the group. What is the strategic vision of the group?
Suggestions: Map of activities across the groups - road map Shared sense of what we're working towards - helping to frame work of this group quarterly, we could spend some time looking at what's happening, seeing where natural alliances might occur. get people to work together where they are not. Looking at where there are no activities and find out what why,
each member of this group, report back? each of the big picture sign up for particular threads or groups to watch. defined areas of observation to track.
meet quarterly?
track things outside of NDSA