NDSA:Government Content Team: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

Revision as of 10:38, 6 June 2012

Back to NDSA:Content teams

Scope

The Government Content Team is interested in the preservation of U.S. local, state, federal born digital content.

Team Facilitators

McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov [co-facilitator]
Reib, Linda | Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records | lreib@LIB.AZ.US [co-facilitator]

Team Members

Baker, Timothy D. | Maryland State Archives | timb@MDSA.NET
Stierholz, Katrina |Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis | katrina.l.stierholz@stls.frb.org
Klein, Kris | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library | kklein@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
Maes, Margaret | Legal Information Preservation Alliance | mkmaes@gmail.com
Kepley, David | NARA | david.kepley@nara.gov
Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
Seneca,Tracy | California Digital Library | tracy.seneca@ucop.edu
Harrison, Anne | Federal Library & Information Center Committee (FLICC) | anha@loc.gov
Swanton, Abbigail | Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction | abbigail.swanton@dpi.wi.gov

Current Activities

Examining Draft of "Government Content at risk"

From May meeting:

Action Items

• Consider effort toward appraisal: particularly what kind of data needs to be preserved. • Determine what kind of permanent data is best used in electronic format for future use. • Develop the case for records creator’s best practices. • Establish best practice for preserving electronic records including replication, integrity checking and migration/format management.

Meetings

Next meeting is schedule for: (April 19th 1:00 - 2:30PM)

Meeting Minutes (link to meeting minutes)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Current Activities==
 * Examining Draft of "Government Content at risk"
-*'''Appraisal of Local Government Information Action Team'''
+From May meeting:
-Notes from a previous meeting of the Content Group:
+Action Items
-An outcome of the CWG workshop, a need was determined for guidance on appraisal for local government information. This group has since been absorbed into the Government Content Team. http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Content_teams
+•	Consider effort toward appraisal: particularly what kind of data needs to be preserved.
+•	Determine what kind of permanent data is best used in electronic format for future use.
-State and local: Margie sat in on that table and reported out about the discussion. Local government information is a particular concern. Horror stories are really at the local level. Examples from the group: data that appeared on individual’s computers but didn’t realize they had something that wasn’t published elsewhere. Floppy or hard drives. Never preserved. Probably tons of examples. How do we get at that sort of thing? John asked about pre-digital, how was it handled? Is this new to the digital world? Our guess is that it always existed, but with paper content is easier to resurrect. We’re not so sure electronic info is being uncovered when changes take place.
+•	Develop the case for records creator’s best practices.
+•	Establish best practice for preserving electronic records including replication, integrity checking and migration/format management.
-NEXT STEPS: The group supported the idea of a new action team regarding appraisal of local government information. Margie agreed to lead (with some additional guidance about what the charge of the group will be). Linda and Kitty also agreed to help. Abbie will poll the list to see if others would like to help.
 ==Meetings==