NDSA:Meeting Minutes 1-19-11: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Cmmorris (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Cmmorris (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production
--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production
--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues
--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues
--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?
--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?
--Process:
--Process:
Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas.


--Deb will take a first pass at an abstract and circulate for comment
• Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas.
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:
 
In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media.  Below is a list of highlights:
 
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly.
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats.
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence.
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware.
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.
 
--Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment
 
--Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012
 
--Submission guidelines from CFP: [http://www.jcdl2012.info/]


'''Video production options/process'''
'''Video production options/process'''

Revision as of 13:41, 20 January 2012

The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:

JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers

--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production

--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues

--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?

--Process:

• Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas.

• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:

In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media. Below is a list of highlights:

• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly. • Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats. • Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence. • Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware. • Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.

--Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment

--Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012

--Submission guidelines from CFP: [1]

Video production options/process

--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc for LIS students, next stepsloc host, sue manus thought it would be a good idea; storytellers to model; ndsa protelitizing; booth at conf. bandwidth why not use it

student groups--first meeting next week; abstract by us; meeting on saturday, could show them abstract;

title of poster: telling story of dig fragility; archives hv sig amt of material that is fragile; call to action; present prelim findings; get participants; ndsa call for members; highlight examples;

next step: Jan. 30;

kim--determine message/audience; average person abt personal digial archive

30 second psa; 5-12 minute mini documentaries on youtube

steps; how much effort; scripts to review; this group will approve; treatment will determine how much $ we need;

begian effort;

freedom and money

fun facts about videos-- that are effective style iseas, creative and research ideas,

talking heads; inst/personal?

more of documentary versus scrpited; prof produced is better; release a prof piece and then crwdsource comments

or call abt kickstarter videos; good advocacy videos; examples r good

kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project; revert to cs video; upper limit

i am the 99% hold up on piece of paper.