NDSA:Content WG October 5, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
==Registry Action Team==
==Registry Action Team==


Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team.  
Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team.
 
Daniel: Started with ALA definitions, found some issues. So Kris O. put together a set of labels:  silver, gold and platinum with a check list.
Note: Platinum level is based on ALA definition
 
Will share it with other groups in alliance so they will have a clearer idea of what will be registering. 
 
Some interaction with clearinghouse with "at risk" content.  Differentiate between digitizing and digital preservation
 
Kris O. has a lot of notes which she will send and we will post.
 
Michael S. suggest adding: "appropriate" intellectual property rights
 
Daniel: Agree: as long as content provider has rights to preserve the content
 
Glen: what other sources extracting information - consider ISO Auditing and Trac criteria?. fairly recent to establish a standard and looking for what organization will help implement.
 
Kris O: more of a check list than an audit. tried to leave it open enough that organizations could use it as works for them
 
Daniel: intention for this registry to be a self reporting one. Few resources for robust auditing program. Trust system. Alliance would not demand
 
John: are you seeing a spread sheet for the labels?  how will this be presented?
 
Daniel: It is up to institution to define what a collection will be. To qualify for a level, would need a collection to fill as many criteria as possible on the spread sheet to keep a relatively simple display.
 
Daniel: a week for comments
 
==Clearinghouse Action Team==
==Clearinghouse Action Team==



Revision as of 14:14, 5 October 2011

Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home

NDSA Content Meeting Minutes

DRAFT Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:00 am ET

Attendees (21)

  • Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
  • Baker, Timothy D. | Maryland State Archives | timb@MDSA.NET
  • Cornwall, Daniel | Alaska State Library | daniel.cornwall@ALASKA.GOV
  • Downs, Robert | CIESIN, Columbia University | rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu
  • Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
  • Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
  • Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
  • Howard, Rachel | Digital Initiatives Librarian, University of Louisville | rachel.howard@LOUISVILLE.EDU
  • Kepley, David | NARA | david.kepley@nara.gov
  • Martin, Kevin | Hagley Museum and Library | kmartin@hagley.org
  • McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
  • Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
  • Nicholson, Shawn | Assistant Director of Libraries| Michigan State University | nicho147@msu.edu
  • Ogilvie, Kris | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library | kogilvie@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
  • Rau, Erik | Hagley Museum and Library | erau@hagley.org
  • Rossum, Deborah |Digital Content Manager| SCOLA |712-566-2202| drossum@SCOLA.ORG
  • Rumsey, Abby Smith | Library of Congress/NDIIPP | abby@arumsey.com
  • Simon, James | Center for Research Libraries | jsimon@crl.edu
  • Stoller, Michael | New York University | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
  • Swanson, Rebecca | SCOLA | rswanson@scola.org
  • Weise, John | Manager of the Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) at the University of Michigan | jweise@UMICH.EDU


Registry Action Team

Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team.

Daniel: Started with ALA definitions, found some issues. So Kris O. put together a set of labels: silver, gold and platinum with a check list. Note: Platinum level is based on ALA definition

Will share it with other groups in alliance so they will have a clearer idea of what will be registering.

Some interaction with clearinghouse with "at risk" content. Differentiate between digitizing and digital preservation

Kris O. has a lot of notes which she will send and we will post.

Michael S. suggest adding: "appropriate" intellectual property rights

Daniel: Agree: as long as content provider has rights to preserve the content

Glen: what other sources extracting information - consider ISO Auditing and Trac criteria?. fairly recent to establish a standard and looking for what organization will help implement.

Kris O: more of a check list than an audit. tried to leave it open enough that organizations could use it as works for them

Daniel: intention for this registry to be a self reporting one. Few resources for robust auditing program. Trust system. Alliance would not demand

John: are you seeing a spread sheet for the labels? how will this be presented?

Daniel: It is up to institution to define what a collection will be. To qualify for a level, would need a collection to fill as many criteria as possible on the spread sheet to keep a relatively simple display.

Daniel: a week for comments

Clearinghouse Action Team

Blog Preservation Action Team

Web Archiving Survey

Misc.

Next Meeting

Our next call will be November 2 at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.

-End-