NDSA:I can haz standards workshop notes: Difference between revisions
Kate.murray1 (talk | contribs) |
Kate.murray1 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Possible use cases: | Possible use cases: | ||
Digital preservation policy | Digital preservation policy | ||
Education/Training | Education/Training | ||
Developing funding proposals/research | Developing funding proposals/research | ||
Funding organizations | |||
Reformatting community: analog to digital | Reformatting community: analog to digital | ||
Data migration | Data migration | ||
Adoption patterns/community | Adoption patterns/community | ||
New standards development | New standards development | ||
Gap analysis for developing new standards | Gap analysis for developing new standards | ||
Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool. | Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool. | ||
Software tool developers | |||
Procurement process mandate use of open standards | |||
Procurement process (which might mandate use of open standards) | |||
History of digital standards | History of digital standards | ||
Avoiding redoing existing work | Avoiding redoing existing work | ||
Revision as of 13:24, 21 July 2011
Table 1
Table 2
Table 2
Should only list institutions that are currently using the standard
Who will maintain this? crowd? or one institution?
Is it important to know who's using the standard?
Do we purge old versions of standards - standards no one is using? (can "dead" stuff go to a separate place)
Would use this as a tool to see what exists and who is using/doing what?
"this is a project that sounds like ours and this is what they're using?" - would mean that we have to be able to search by organization
Be able to search by type of material - "x is doing y - I'm also doing y...."
Take a look at the IU - Jen Riley's metadata organization model
Relational database of some kind - LibraryThing is something we should look at. Some fields that the general user can input and others are protected
We should take a look at WordPress
Talk to Jack Brighton about Expression Engine
Table 3
Possible use cases: Digital preservation policy
Education/Training
Developing funding proposals/research
Funding organizations
Reformatting community: analog to digital
Data migration
Adoption patterns/community
New standards development
Gap analysis for developing new standards
Creating new born digital content need systems. Content must be viable over long term. Need easy to use tool. Software tool developers
Procurement process (which might mandate use of open standards)
History of digital standards
Avoiding redoing existing work
Possibly add to survey: related projects
Big issues around presentation and data input for group; usefulness Depends on content staying current
Table 4
test
-- scope: descriptive? standards / guidelines / practices
-- use cases: newbie, student, new project planners, hardware purchase decisions; developers; preparing outsource specification
-- difficulty to maintain over time? distributed mode with editor? Regular request to community for updates?
-- standards in use around table: METS, PREMIS, ASE, DACS, EAD, PeDALS; Astronomy FITS; RDF;
-- what about file format standards? what about best practices for preservation and access?
-- Questions: need more use cases to justify? What about standards and practices still needed? Gap analysis?
-- use format / community-based, investigation / organization
Table 5
1. Software developers -Just need minimal information - titles, links, maybe tags -goal - need to work in aoarticular problem. Space
Useful to know if the standard is dead, still used
2. Tools Google fusion tables Freebase?