NDSA:Content WG February 2, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
Wednesday, February 2, 2011 11am EST
Wednesday, February 2, 2011 11am EST


===Attendees ():===
===Attendees (15):===
 
[Note to attendees: If I left anyone off, please add your name or let me know and I'll add it!]


*Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
*Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
Line 28: Line 30:
=== Updated on Definition of digital preservation ===
=== Updated on Definition of digital preservation ===


Abbie reported that definition of d p has been brought up in many working groups and LC team has talked about recommending one definition that we all agree on. Something should come out on the list soon but ALA ALCTS preservation and reforming section working group on defining digital preservation could be one to use. [link]
Abbie reported that "what is the definition of digital preservation for NDSA" has been brought up in many working groups, including ours, and LC team has talked about recommending one definition that we all would then agree upon. Something should come out on the NDSA_ALL list soon, but ALA ALCTS Preservation and Reforming Section Working Group on Defining Digital Preservation is what LC has recommended using. Comments welcome about that. See it here: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm


=== Work Areas ===
=== Work Areas ===
Line 34: Line 36:
'''[[NDSA:Content Registry Action Team]] (Group A)'''  
'''[[NDSA:Content Registry Action Team]] (Group A)'''  


Work has started - first two steps to look at existing registry projects. Rachel, Abbie, Arlene, Christie looking at this - gotten a start already
Daniel reported on Group A. Work has started. The first two steps are to look at existing registry projects. Rachel, Abbie, Arlene, Christie have gotten started. See their work so far here: http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Existing_Registry_Projects
 
Second step to come up with definitiaion as what counted as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out = important to have same understanding across working groups. This step - different project registries, but some are "this is being scanned" - develop a list of documenting what is being preserved. Then we'll go on to our next step.
 
Our plan is to have existing registry projects ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready we are for next steps.


Next steps will be more of a challenge. It is on the wiki - [ add link]
The group's second step to come up with a definition as to what counts as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out; it is important to have same understanding across working groups. As we look at different project registries, we're noticing that some are registries of what has been digitized - we are including them for now but the goal is to develop a list documenting what is being preserved.  


The plan is to have the existing registry projects list ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready for our next steps, which will be more of a challenge.  (see here for more details: http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Tentative_Work_Plan_for_Content_Registry)




'''[[NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team]] (Group B)'''
'''[[NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team]] (Group B)'''


kristine reported on Group B - restarted objectives. Tacking one at a time. First call - start to determine what types of content are at risk or collections that are at risk.  
Kristine reported on Group B - restarted objectives. Tacking one at a time. First call - start to determine what types of content are at risk or collections that are at risk.  


Decided to meet again once a month, week prior to this larger meeting so we can report back out to CWG.  
Decided to meet again once a month, week prior to this larger meeting so we can report back out to CWG.  

Revision as of 11:29, 3 February 2011

Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home


NDSA Content Meeting Minutes -DRAFT

Wednesday, February 2, 2011 11am EST

Attendees (15):

[Note to attendees: If I left anyone off, please add your name or let me know and I'll add it!]

  • Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
  • Cornwall, Daniel | Alaska State Library | daniel.cornwall@ALASKA.GOV
  • Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
  • Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV
  • Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
  • Harrison, Anne | Federal Library & Information Center Committee (FLICC) | anha@loc.gov
  • Hartman, Cathy | Associate Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
  • Howard, Rachel | Digital Initiatives Librarian, University of Louisville | rachel.howard@LOUISVILLE.EDU
  • Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
  • Ogilvie, Kris | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library | kogilvie@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
  • Pienta, Amy | University of Michigan/Data-PASS | apienta@umich.ed
  • Rossum, Deborah |Digital Content Manager| SCOLA |712-566-2202| drossum@SCOLA.ORG
  • Watters, Pete | Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records | pwatters@LIB.AZ.US
  • Weise, John | Manager of the Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) at the University of Michigan | jweise@UMICH.EDU
  • Whitacre, Lindsay Skay | WGBH | lindsay_whitacre@WGBH.ORG


Updated on Definition of digital preservation

Abbie reported that "what is the definition of digital preservation for NDSA" has been brought up in many working groups, including ours, and LC team has talked about recommending one definition that we all would then agree upon. Something should come out on the NDSA_ALL list soon, but ALA ALCTS Preservation and Reforming Section Working Group on Defining Digital Preservation is what LC has recommended using. Comments welcome about that. See it here: http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm

Work Areas

NDSA:Content Registry Action Team (Group A)

Daniel reported on Group A. Work has started. The first two steps are to look at existing registry projects. Rachel, Abbie, Arlene, Christie have gotten started. See their work so far here: http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Existing_Registry_Projects

The group's second step to come up with a definition as to what counts as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out; it is important to have same understanding across working groups. As we look at different project registries, we're noticing that some are registries of what has been digitized - we are including them for now but the goal is to develop a list documenting what is being preserved.

The plan is to have the existing registry projects list ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready for our next steps, which will be more of a challenge. (see here for more details: http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Tentative_Work_Plan_for_Content_Registry)


NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team (Group B)

Kristine reported on Group B - restarted objectives. Tacking one at a time. First call - start to determine what types of content are at risk or collections that are at risk.

Decided to meet again once a month, week prior to this larger meeting so we can report back out to CWG.

We started to assemble examples of at-risk content [add link] - currently 11 examples, we welcome more from other members of action team or this large group.

[read the list]

Online phone directories is one that was send by Abbie after the meeting. Send more ideas! After we get the list fairly comprehensive Glenn and Kristine would meet to start to categorize (others welcome to help). Haven't started that yet - waiting for other feedback. Email to Kristine or put on the wiki. Not a perfect list - we're in brainstorming phase.

Daniel - looks like a good list - kudos for including local government and telephone directories. Municipal documents are of high interest/concern. Cathy wanted to be sure state documents is included. Budgets have caused changes/cuts in preservation of Texas state documents.

Glenn - we're prioritizing rather than eliminating - state docs are still in.

Kris - recommend that we put records and documents, archivists have specific meanings. Both are important. Depending on who you are talking to, think of it in different ways.

Google groups has been set up for Group B. John Weise set it up, haven't really started to use it yet. [put a link].

Our next call will be March 2nd at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.

-End-

Retrieved from "https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=NDSA:Content_WG_February_2,_2011_Meeting_Minutes&oldid=2099"