NDSA:Content WG February 2, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
Second step to come up with definitiaion as what counted as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out = important to have same understanding across working groups. This step - different project registries, but some are "this is being scanned" - develop a list of documenting what is being preserved. Then we'll go on to our next step. | Second step to come up with definitiaion as what counted as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out = important to have same understanding across working groups. This step - different project registries, but some are "this is being scanned" - develop a list of documenting what is being preserved. Then we'll go on to our next step. | ||
Our plan is to have existing registry projects ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready we are for next steps. | Our plan is to have existing registry projects ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready we are for next steps. | ||
Next steps will be more of a challenge. It is on the wiki - [ add link] | |||
'''[[NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team]] (Group B)''' | '''[[NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team]] (Group B)''' | ||
kristine reported on Group B - restarted objectives. Tacking one at a time. First call - start to determine what types of content are at risk or collections that are at risk. | |||
Decided to meet again once a month, week prior to this larger meeting so we can report back out to CWG. | |||
We started to assemble examples of at-risk content [add link] - currently 11 examples, we welcome more from other members of action team or this large group. | |||
[read the list] | |||
Revision as of 12:11, 2 February 2011
Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home
NDSA Content Meeting Minutes
Wednesday, February 2, 2011 11am EST
Attendees ():
- Alaska State Library - Daniel Cornwall
- BMS Chase - John Spencer
- California Digital Library - Tricia Cruse
- Idaho Historical Society - Elizabeth Falk
- Internet Archive - Kristine Hanna
- Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives – Glen McAninch
- Library of Congress - Abbie Grotke
- Library of Congress - Michelle Gallinger
- Library of Congress/NDIIPP – Abby Smith Rumsey
- Maryland State Archives - Timothy Baker
- New York University - Michael Stoller
- Oregon State Library - Arlene Weible
- University of Louisville - Rachel Howard
- University of Maryland - Jennie Knies
- University of Maryland - Patricia Steele
- University of Michigan – DLPS - John Weise
- University of North Texas - Cathy Hartman
- USGS - John Faundeen (Guest Participant)
- Wisconsin Department of Administration - Curtis Pulford
Minutes of the last meeting
There were no requested changes to minutes from our prior meeting.
Work Areas
NDSA:Content Registry Action Team (Group A)
Work has started - first two steps to look at existing registry projects. Rachel, Abbie, Arlene, Christie looking at this - gotten a start already
Second step to come up with definitiaion as what counted as digitally preserved. We can look at the definition that Abbie will send out = important to have same understanding across working groups. This step - different project registries, but some are "this is being scanned" - develop a list of documenting what is being preserved. Then we'll go on to our next step.
Our plan is to have existing registry projects ready for the March meeting of CWG. From there we'll see how ready we are for next steps.
Next steps will be more of a challenge. It is on the wiki - [ add link]
NDSA:Clearinghouse Action Team (Group B)
kristine reported on Group B - restarted objectives. Tacking one at a time. First call - start to determine what types of content are at risk or collections that are at risk.
Decided to meet again once a month, week prior to this larger meeting so we can report back out to CWG.
We started to assemble examples of at-risk content [add link] - currently 11 examples, we welcome more from other members of action team or this large group.
[read the list]
Our next call will be March 2nd at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.
-End-