Assessment:Benefits: Difference between revisions
Thompsonsa82 (talk | contribs) |
Thompsonsa82 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment | The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment. | ||
== Current Projects == | == Current Projects == | ||
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active. | The Benefits Working Group is not currently active. | ||
== Get Involved == | |||
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our | |||
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-) | |||
== Past Projects == | == Past Projects == | ||
=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? === | === How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? === | ||
Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"]. | |||
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following: | Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following: | ||
| Line 20: | Line 27: | ||
* Address special challenges raised by aggregation | * Address special challenges raised by aggregation | ||
We | We shared resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]]. | ||
We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]]. | |||
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She incorporated suggestions and recommendations. | |||
[https:// | |||
---- | ---- | ||
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page] | [http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page] | ||
Revision as of 13:35, 17 January 2018
The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment.
Current Projects
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.
Get Involved
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our Digital Library Assessment Google Group and speak up! :-)
Past Projects
How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries?
Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories".
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:
- Create operational definitions of value for digital libraries in general
- Assess alignment of benefits with institutional goals
- Develop standardized methods, comparable across institutions, to measure the benefits
The latter might include:
* Altmetrics * Citations * Web stats and Google Analytics * Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups) * Address special challenges raised by aggregation
We shared resources on Assessment:Altmetrics.
We formed a working group on Assessment:Citations and another on Assessment:Analytics.
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. Now Closed. She incorporated suggestions and recommendations.