NDSA:Tuesday, Jan 29, 2013: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
'''Presentations vs calls:''' | '''Presentations vs calls:''' | ||
---- | |||
* Trevor asked if the presentations were a good way for us to work. John said he liked the presentations from the OSS vendors. | * Trevor asked if the presentations were a good way for us to work. John said he liked the presentations from the OSS vendors. | ||
* Coordinating comm report on top issues relating to presentations. | * Coordinating comm report on top issues relating to presentations. | ||
* Next presentations: | |||
o February 26 Fedora 2 pm | o February 26 Fedora 2 pm | ||
o Hydra March 19 3 pm ET | o Hydra March 19 3 pm ET | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 31 January 2013
On the Call
- Andrea Goethals, Harvard University
- Andy Aston, Brown University
- Chris Miller
- Christopher “Cal” Lee, UNC
- John Spencer, BMS Chase
- Emily Shaw, U of Iowa
- Gail Truman, Truman Technologies
- Jane Mandelbaum, Library of Congress
- Jefferson Bailey- Metropolitan New York Library Council
- José “Ricky” Padilla- LoC intern
- Karen Cariani, WGBH
- Mark Myers- Kentucky State Archive
- Micah Altman- MIT
- Nicholas Taylor- Library of Congress
- Trevor Owens- Library of Congress
Presentations vs calls:
- Trevor asked if the presentations were a good way for us to work. John said he liked the presentations from the OSS vendors.
- Coordinating comm report on top issues relating to presentations.
- Next presentations:
o February 26 Fedora 2 pm o Hydra March 19 3 pm ET • Group was asked to think about what are really big infrastructure issues for preservation for us to discuss. If there were other ideas for open source software projects or initiatives? • Other options for presentations were: o Bit Curator (Cal Lee said he would be fine with presenting it) o OpenRefine (formerly Google Refine) o DPLA open source (good to hear more about what they are creating)