NDSA:Meeting Minutes 1-19-11: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production | --to increase participation: contributing ideas, production | ||
--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues | --point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues | ||
--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it? | --LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it? | ||
--Process: | --Process: | ||
--Deb will take a first pass at an abstract and circulate for comment | • Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas. | ||
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use: | |||
In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media. Below is a list of highlights: | |||
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly. | |||
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats. | |||
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence. | |||
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware. | |||
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open. | |||
--Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment | |||
--Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012 | |||
--Submission guidelines from CFP: [http://www.jcdl2012.info/] | |||
'''Video production options/process''' | '''Video production options/process''' |
Revision as of 13:41, 20 January 2012
The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:
JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers
--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production
--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues
--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?
--Process:
• Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas.
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:
In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media. Below is a list of highlights:
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly. • Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats. • Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence. • Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware. • Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.
--Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment
--Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012
--Submission guidelines from CFP: [1]
Video production options/process
--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc for LIS students, next stepsloc host, sue manus thought it would be a good idea; storytellers to model; ndsa protelitizing; booth at conf. bandwidth why not use it
student groups--first meeting next week; abstract by us; meeting on saturday, could show them abstract;
title of poster: telling story of dig fragility; archives hv sig amt of material that is fragile; call to action; present prelim findings; get participants; ndsa call for members; highlight examples;
next step: Jan. 30;
kim--determine message/audience; average person abt personal digial archive
30 second psa; 5-12 minute mini documentaries on youtube
steps; how much effort; scripts to review; this group will approve; treatment will determine how much $ we need;
begian effort;
freedom and money
fun facts about videos-- that are effective style iseas, creative and research ideas,
talking heads; inst/personal?
more of documentary versus scrpited; prof produced is better; release a prof piece and then crwdsource comments
or call abt kickstarter videos; good advocacy videos; examples r good
kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project; revert to cs video; upper limit
i am the 99% hold up on piece of paper.