NDSA:November 2 Blog Preservation Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
November 2, 2011, 11am ET | November 2, 2011, 11am ET | ||
Attendees | =Attendees= | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
*'''Taylor, Nicholas''' | Library of Congress | ntay@loc.gov | *'''Taylor, Nicholas''' | Library of Congress | ntay@loc.gov | ||
*'''Wurl, Joel''' | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov | *'''Wurl, Joel''' | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov | ||
(Attendees from NDSA member organizations in bold) | |||
=AGENDA= | |||
==Welcome/Introductions== | |||
Attendees introduced themselves and talked about their specific interests in this project. | |||
==Brief report on background of this idea== | |||
Abbie provided a quick report on how we got to this meeting (referring to the distributed blog proposal). She summed up the three ideas listed in that proposal, but explained that this meeting was to focus particularly on the "Flag for opt-in to preservation and harvesting" idea. | |||
==Discussion on #3== | |||
Some of the questions received before the meeting included: | |||
*If a blog owner opts-in, would that guarantee preservation? | |||
*Will blog owners expect backup services if they opt-in? | |||
*How do we get notified that blogs have opted-in? Are notices sent somewhere? Some other ideas: | |||
*A Google spreadsheet that gets auto-updated; preservationists could refer to and pick and choose what to preserve. | |||
*Machine-readable tag that could be used to auto-detect sites that have opted-in (a la creative commons) | |||
*A feed of some sort? | |||
*How often/frequently would notifications or updates to whatever process we put in place occur? | |||
*Is a license/agreement needed? | |||
*What sorts of information would we want from the blog owner besides permission? (category/subject? Frequency of change information? Other data?) | |||
*Do we want data shared about who is preserving what? If organizations are picking and choosing what to preserve from the available blogs, might be good to have that information available to others (publicly or among NDSA members?) | |||
• Next Steps/Action Items | |||
Revision as of 11:09, 4 November 2011
November 2, 2011, 11am ET
Attendees
- Anderson, Janice Snyder | Georgetown University Law Library | anderjan@law.georgetown.edu
- Anderson, Martha | Director, NDIIPP, Library of Congress | mande@loc.gov
- Baker, Timothy D. | Maryland State Archives | timb@MDSA.NET
- Beers, Elizabeth | University of Michigan Library | embeers@umich.edu
- Carpenter, Kris | Internet Archive | kcarpenter@archive.org
- Chudnoff, Dan | George Washington University | dchud@gwu.edu
- Fallon, Tessa | Columbia University | taf2111@columbia.edu
- Fido-Radin, Ben | Rhizome | ben.finoradin@rhizome.org
- Grotke, Abbie | Library of Congress, Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV
- Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
- Hartman, Cathy | University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
- Jones, Gina | Library of Congress | gjon@loc.gov
- Johnston, Leslie | Library of Congress | lesliej@loc.gov
- Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
- Nacin, Andrew | Wordpress | andrewnacin@gmail.com
- Owens, Trevor | Library of Congress | trow@loc.gov
- Potter, Abbey | Library of Congress | abpo@LOC.GOV
- Reib, Linda | Arizona State Library, Archives, and Public Records | lreib@LIB.AZ.US
- Schmitz Furhrig, Lynda | Smithsonian Institution | SchmitzfuhrigL@si.edu
- Smith, Stephanie | Maryland State Archives
- Taylor, Nicholas | Library of Congress | ntay@loc.gov
- Wurl, Joel | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov
(Attendees from NDSA member organizations in bold)
AGENDA
Welcome/Introductions
Attendees introduced themselves and talked about their specific interests in this project.
Brief report on background of this idea
Abbie provided a quick report on how we got to this meeting (referring to the distributed blog proposal). She summed up the three ideas listed in that proposal, but explained that this meeting was to focus particularly on the "Flag for opt-in to preservation and harvesting" idea.
Discussion on #3
Some of the questions received before the meeting included:
- If a blog owner opts-in, would that guarantee preservation?
- Will blog owners expect backup services if they opt-in?
- How do we get notified that blogs have opted-in? Are notices sent somewhere? Some other ideas:
- A Google spreadsheet that gets auto-updated; preservationists could refer to and pick and choose what to preserve.
- Machine-readable tag that could be used to auto-detect sites that have opted-in (a la creative commons)
- A feed of some sort?
- How often/frequently would notifications or updates to whatever process we put in place occur?
- Is a license/agreement needed?
- What sorts of information would we want from the blog owner besides permission? (category/subject? Frequency of change information? Other data?)
- Do we want data shared about who is preserving what? If organizations are picking and choosing what to preserve from the available blogs, might be good to have that information available to others (publicly or among NDSA members?)
• Next Steps/Action Items