NDSA:Content WG October 5, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Registry Action Team== | ==Registry Action Team== | ||
Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team. | Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team. | ||
Daniel: Started with ALA definitions, found some issues. So Kris O. put together a set of labels: silver, gold and platinum with a check list. | |||
Note: Platinum level is based on ALA definition | |||
Will share it with other groups in alliance so they will have a clearer idea of what will be registering. | |||
Some interaction with clearinghouse with "at risk" content. Differentiate between digitizing and digital preservation | |||
Kris O. has a lot of notes which she will send and we will post. | |||
Michael S. suggest adding: "appropriate" intellectual property rights | |||
Daniel: Agree: as long as content provider has rights to preserve the content | |||
Glen: what other sources extracting information - consider ISO Auditing and Trac criteria?. fairly recent to establish a standard and looking for what organization will help implement. | |||
Kris O: more of a check list than an audit. tried to leave it open enough that organizations could use it as works for them | |||
Daniel: intention for this registry to be a self reporting one. Few resources for robust auditing program. Trust system. Alliance would not demand | |||
John: are you seeing a spread sheet for the labels? how will this be presented? | |||
Daniel: It is up to institution to define what a collection will be. To qualify for a level, would need a collection to fill as many criteria as possible on the spread sheet to keep a relatively simple display. | |||
Daniel: a week for comments | |||
==Clearinghouse Action Team== | ==Clearinghouse Action Team== | ||
Revision as of 13:14, 5 October 2011
Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home
NDSA Content Meeting Minutes
DRAFT Wednesday, October 5, 2011 11:00 am ET
Attendees (21)
- Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
- Baker, Timothy D. | Maryland State Archives | timb@MDSA.NET
- Cornwall, Daniel | Alaska State Library | daniel.cornwall@ALASKA.GOV
- Downs, Robert | CIESIN, Columbia University | rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu
- Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
- Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
- Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
- Howard, Rachel | Digital Initiatives Librarian, University of Louisville | rachel.howard@LOUISVILLE.EDU
- Kepley, David | NARA | david.kepley@nara.gov
- Martin, Kevin | Hagley Museum and Library | kmartin@hagley.org
- McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
- Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
- Nicholson, Shawn | Assistant Director of Libraries| Michigan State University | nicho147@msu.edu
- Ogilvie, Kris | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library | kogilvie@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
- Rau, Erik | Hagley Museum and Library | erau@hagley.org
- Rossum, Deborah |Digital Content Manager| SCOLA |712-566-2202| drossum@SCOLA.ORG
- Rumsey, Abby Smith | Library of Congress/NDIIPP | abby@arumsey.com
- Simon, James | Center for Research Libraries | jsimon@crl.edu
- Stoller, Michael | New York University | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
- Swanson, Rebecca | SCOLA | rswanson@scola.org
- Weise, John | Manager of the Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) at the University of Michigan | jweise@UMICH.EDU
Registry Action Team
Danial and Kris reported out on the recent activities of the registry action team.
Daniel: Started with ALA definitions, found some issues. So Kris O. put together a set of labels: silver, gold and platinum with a check list. Note: Platinum level is based on ALA definition
Will share it with other groups in alliance so they will have a clearer idea of what will be registering.
Some interaction with clearinghouse with "at risk" content. Differentiate between digitizing and digital preservation
Kris O. has a lot of notes which she will send and we will post.
Michael S. suggest adding: "appropriate" intellectual property rights
Daniel: Agree: as long as content provider has rights to preserve the content
Glen: what other sources extracting information - consider ISO Auditing and Trac criteria?. fairly recent to establish a standard and looking for what organization will help implement.
Kris O: more of a check list than an audit. tried to leave it open enough that organizations could use it as works for them
Daniel: intention for this registry to be a self reporting one. Few resources for robust auditing program. Trust system. Alliance would not demand
John: are you seeing a spread sheet for the labels? how will this be presented?
Daniel: It is up to institution to define what a collection will be. To qualify for a level, would need a collection to fill as many criteria as possible on the spread sheet to keep a relatively simple display.
Daniel: a week for comments
Clearinghouse Action Team
Blog Preservation Action Team
Web Archiving Survey
Misc.
Next Meeting
Our next call will be November 2 at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.
-End-