Assessment:Citations: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The DLF Assessment Interest Group (DLF AIG) citations working group formed in the Fall of 2014 following the successful launch of the larger DLF AIG at the 2014 DLF forum. Volunteers interested in developing best practices for creating and displaying citations for digital library assets were solicited through the Digital Library Assessment Google Group. The citations working group was tasked with answering the following questions: | |||
# What should a citation consist of? | # What should a citation consist of? | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture? | # What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture? | ||
The citations working group was further split up to accomplish the following goals: | |||
# Draft citation standards, based on what can and can't be incorporated into APA, Chicago, and MLA, that incorporate the necessary elements for digitized special collections and institutional repository content | |||
# Explore how best to display citation information in page markup so reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote Web can easily parse the pages to import complete citation information | |||
# Compile information on the technical issues for displaying citations from major software systems | |||
As of DLF 2015, the first goal involving draft citation standards has been completed. An initial draft was circulated to the DLF Assessment group using Google Docs from March 6 through April 3, 2015. At that point comments and edits that were grammar and/or punctuation-related as well as suggestions to clarify text were resolved, and a new document was moved to for further editing. Additional comments were invited through April 24, 2015, at which point this version of the document was compiled.The resulting white paper, "Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets," is now available. | |||
Access to the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eAb9ObJ_KU6Lp9_3vngOehS16XVX4vaW9B6_gNQ52_M/edit?usp=sharing white paper is available via Google docs here,] and will be posted on Figshare following DLF 2015. | |||
--- | --- | ||
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our | If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our | ||
Revision as of 09:44, 5 October 2015
The DLF Assessment Interest Group (DLF AIG) citations working group formed in the Fall of 2014 following the successful launch of the larger DLF AIG at the 2014 DLF forum. Volunteers interested in developing best practices for creating and displaying citations for digital library assets were solicited through the Digital Library Assessment Google Group. The citations working group was tasked with answering the following questions:
- What should a citation consist of?
- How can we best support appropriate citations?
- To what extent do common citation formats support this?
- What are the limitations of current digital library software systems, for displaying citation information?
- What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture?
The citations working group was further split up to accomplish the following goals:
- Draft citation standards, based on what can and can't be incorporated into APA, Chicago, and MLA, that incorporate the necessary elements for digitized special collections and institutional repository content
- Explore how best to display citation information in page markup so reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote Web can easily parse the pages to import complete citation information
- Compile information on the technical issues for displaying citations from major software systems
As of DLF 2015, the first goal involving draft citation standards has been completed. An initial draft was circulated to the DLF Assessment group using Google Docs from March 6 through April 3, 2015. At that point comments and edits that were grammar and/or punctuation-related as well as suggestions to clarify text were resolved, and a new document was moved to for further editing. Additional comments were invited through April 24, 2015, at which point this version of the document was compiled.The resulting white paper, "Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets," is now available.
Access to the white paper is available via Google docs here, and will be posted on Figshare following DLF 2015.
--- If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our Digital Library Assessment Google Group and speak up! :-)
Reference resources:
- ANSI/NISO Standard Z39.29-2005 (R2010) Bibliographic References
- The California Digital Library's Datapub blog has a good summary of data citation basics, which document "core" and "recommended" components of dataset citations.
- Spiro, Lisa, and Jane Segal. “The Impact of Digital Resources on Humanities Research.” — Fondren Library, Rice University., n.d. Web. 2 July 2014. [1]
- Eccles, Kathryn E., Mike Thelwall, and Eric T. Meyer. “Measuring the Web Impact of Digitised Scholarly Resources.” Journal of Documentation 68.4 (2012): 512–526. ProQuest. Web. 3 July 2014. [2]
- Kelly, Elizabeth. A guide for students on citing digitized special collection materials using Chicago, MLA, and APA citation styles [3]