NDSA:Meeting Minutes 1-19-11: Difference between revisions

From DLF Wiki
Cmmorris (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
m 6 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:
''The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:''


'''JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers'''
'''JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers'''
Line 11: Line 11:
--Process:
--Process:


• Poster will highlight two submitted data loss story ideas: one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation in submitting story ideas.
• Poster will highlight the overall story of digital fragility with two selected data loss story ideas (from those submitted): one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation/call to action in submitting story ideas.
   
   
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:  
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:  
Line 18: Line 18:


• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly.
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly.
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats.  
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats.  
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence.  
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence.  
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware.  
 
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware.
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.  
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.  


--Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment
Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment


--Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012
Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012


--Submission guidelines from CFP: [http://www.jcdl2012.info/]
Submission guidelines from CFP: [http://www.jcdl2012.info/]


'''Video production options/process'''
'''Video production options/process'''


--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc for LIS students, next stepsloc host, sue manus thought it would be a good idea; storytellers to model; ndsa protelitizing; booth at conf. bandwidth why not use it
--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc prepared for LIS students and others who might be able to get involved in story production


student groups--first meeting next week; abstract by us; meeting on saturday, could show them abstract;
--Her first meeting with student groups is next week;she would like to show them the draft JCDL poster abstract to better explain the initiative
 
title of poster: telling story of dig fragility; archives hv sig amt of material that is fragile; call to action; present prelim findings; get participants; ndsa call for members; highlight examples;


next step: Jan. 30;
--feedback on the message/audience is welcome: are the PSA-type videos aimed at the average person about personal digial archiving?


kim--determine message/audience; average person abt personal digial archive
--Initial thoughts on style: 30 second PSA; Have also seen 5-12 minute preservation and archiving mini-documentaries on YouTube


30 second psa; 5-12 minute mini documentaries on youtube
--this group will approve scripts


steps; how much effort; scripts to review; this group will approve; treatment will determine how much $ we need;
--treatment/style will determine what resources will be needed


begian effort;
--producers will have freedom to determine style/message


freedom and money
--Kim is looking for effective video style ideas and research ideas that would inspire producers. Example: [http://vimeo.com/35193889]


fun facts about videos-- that are effective style iseas, creative and research ideas,
--Amanda envisioned videos that would be low-end talking heads


talking heads; inst/personal?
--more of documentary versus scripted; professionally produced is better; we could release a professional piece and then crowdsource comments


more of documentary versus scrpited; prof produced is better; release a prof piece and then crwdsource comments
--Butch suggests Kickstarter videos are good examples of quick and dirty video advocacy.


or call abt kickstarter videos; good advocacy videos; examples r good
--Kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project


kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project; revert to cs video; upper limit
--Should we also be asking stakeholders/storytellers for easy, low-end homemade videos?


i am the 99% hold up on piece of paper.
--On easy story style: Like "I am the 99%"--hold up a piece of paper with a story.

Latest revision as of 14:19, 11 February 2016

The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:

JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers

--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production

--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues

--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?

--Process:

• Poster will highlight the overall story of digital fragility with two selected data loss story ideas (from those submitted): one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation/call to action in submitting story ideas.

• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:

In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media. Below is a list of highlights:

• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly.

• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats.

• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence.

• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware.

• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.

• Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment

• Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012

• Submission guidelines from CFP: [1]

Video production options/process

--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc prepared for LIS students and others who might be able to get involved in story production

--Her first meeting with student groups is next week;she would like to show them the draft JCDL poster abstract to better explain the initiative


--feedback on the message/audience is welcome: are the PSA-type videos aimed at the average person about personal digial archiving?

--Initial thoughts on style: 30 second PSA; Have also seen 5-12 minute preservation and archiving mini-documentaries on YouTube

--this group will approve scripts

--treatment/style will determine what resources will be needed

--producers will have freedom to determine style/message

--Kim is looking for effective video style ideas and research ideas that would inspire producers. Example: [2]

--Amanda envisioned videos that would be low-end talking heads

--more of documentary versus scripted; professionally produced is better; we could release a professional piece and then crowdsource comments

--Butch suggests Kickstarter videos are good examples of quick and dirty video advocacy.

--Kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project

--Should we also be asking stakeholders/storytellers for easy, low-end homemade videos?

--On easy story style: Like "I am the 99%"--hold up a piece of paper with a story.