NDSA:August 18, 2014 Standards and Practices Working Group Action Items and Recording: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m 16 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Project Updates and Announcements == | == Project Updates and Announcements == | ||
*Video Deep Dive | *Preliminary Results Summary of the Video Deep Dive Survey | ||
**The survey received a total of 224 responses. | |||
**The blog post on The Signal was the most popular means to get the word out (27%) followed by the AMIA list (13%) and the NDSA-ALL list (11%). | |||
**A significant number of respondents (25%) were directed to the survey through other tools including Twitter, Facebook, PrestoCenter **Newsletter and the specially-designed bookmarks distributed at the DP14 meeting. | |||
**The vast majority of respondent who identified their affiliation were from the United States; other countries represented include Germany, **Austria, England, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Denmark and Chile. | |||
**The survey identified these as the top five stumbling blocks in preserving video: | |||
***Getting funding resources to start preserving video (e.g., in-house equipment and systems, staff, outsourced work) (18%) | |||
***Adequate digital storage capacity that can accommodate video master files (14%) | |||
***Locating technical guidance on video file formats in which you have sufficient confidence, whether standards or best practices (11%) | |||
***'''Repository services that facilitate active management of video (e.g., ingest, security, monitoring, fixity checks) (10%)''' | |||
***'''Knowing where to start with video preservation (9%)''' | |||
**Lower ranking issues include | |||
***Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video preservation (2.5%) | |||
***Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video access (2.5%) | |||
***Identifying or implementing technology for provisioning video access (e.g., streaming) (1.5%) | |||
**Issues reported as Solved at specific institutions include | |||
***'''Knowing where to start with video preservation (44%)''' Note that this was also listed as a Top 5 issue. This polarity is perhaps explained by the range of communities answering the survey. More mature programs are well on their way while emerging programs are looking for resources. | |||
***'''Getting management buy-in to start preserving video (41%)''' | |||
***Locating sufficient video technical expertise, whether on staff or as an outside resource (22%) | |||
**'''Respondents report that analog/physical media is the most challenging type of video (73%)''' followed by born digital (42%) and digital on physical media (34%). | |||
*Meg Phillips, NARA, mentioned comments are open for NARA's draft minimum metadata guidance document. See the Records Express blog post: http://blogs.archives.gov/records-express/2014/08/11/review-and-comment-on-draft-metadata-guidance/ | *Meg Phillips, NARA, mentioned comments are open for NARA's draft minimum metadata guidance document. See the Records Express blog post: http://blogs.archives.gov/records-express/2014/08/11/review-and-comment-on-draft-metadata-guidance/ | ||
Line 38: | Line 59: | ||
* Kara Van Malssen | * Kara Van Malssen | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Action Items == | |||
*If anyone is interested in participating in the Video Deep Dive analysis, please contact Andrea (andrea_goethals@harvard.edu) and Kate (kmur@loc.gov). | |||
*John S. volunteered to take notes on the next call. | |||
*The next call is Monday, Sept. 15, 1-2 pm ET. |
Latest revision as of 15:20, 11 February 2016
New Member Introduction
- Lisa Snider, Canadian Museum of Human Rights in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (@ Harry Ransom until the end of August)
- Angelike Contis, Vermont Access Network
- Carolyn Cox (previously Campbell) Georgetown University
Project Updates and Announcements
- Preliminary Results Summary of the Video Deep Dive Survey
- The survey received a total of 224 responses.
- The blog post on The Signal was the most popular means to get the word out (27%) followed by the AMIA list (13%) and the NDSA-ALL list (11%).
- A significant number of respondents (25%) were directed to the survey through other tools including Twitter, Facebook, PrestoCenter **Newsletter and the specially-designed bookmarks distributed at the DP14 meeting.
- The vast majority of respondent who identified their affiliation were from the United States; other countries represented include Germany, **Austria, England, South Africa, Australia, Canada, Denmark and Chile.
- The survey identified these as the top five stumbling blocks in preserving video:
- Getting funding resources to start preserving video (e.g., in-house equipment and systems, staff, outsourced work) (18%)
- Adequate digital storage capacity that can accommodate video master files (14%)
- Locating technical guidance on video file formats in which you have sufficient confidence, whether standards or best practices (11%)
- Repository services that facilitate active management of video (e.g., ingest, security, monitoring, fixity checks) (10%)
- Knowing where to start with video preservation (9%)
- Lower ranking issues include
- Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video preservation (2.5%)
- Uncertainty regarding intellectual property issues as they relate to video access (2.5%)
- Identifying or implementing technology for provisioning video access (e.g., streaming) (1.5%)
- Issues reported as Solved at specific institutions include
- Knowing where to start with video preservation (44%) Note that this was also listed as a Top 5 issue. This polarity is perhaps explained by the range of communities answering the survey. More mature programs are well on their way while emerging programs are looking for resources.
- Getting management buy-in to start preserving video (41%)
- Locating sufficient video technical expertise, whether on staff or as an outside resource (22%)
- Respondents report that analog/physical media is the most challenging type of video (73%) followed by born digital (42%) and digital on physical media (34%).
- Meg Phillips, NARA, mentioned comments are open for NARA's draft minimum metadata guidance document. See the Records Express blog post: http://blogs.archives.gov/records-express/2014/08/11/review-and-comment-on-draft-metadata-guidance/
Discussion Topic: DP14 Recap and Reflections
- In lieu of capturing notes, the conference call audio and web interface (including chat window and participants list) were recorded.
https://locosi.adobeconnect.com/p1ffyynvljy/ (approx. 50 mins)
- Enter passcode: NDSA
Participants:
- Andrea Goethals, Harvard
- Winston Atkins, Duke
- Michelle Paolillo (Cornell)
- John Spencer, BMS Chace
- Midge Coates, Auburn
- Erin Engle, LC
- Vika Zafrin
- Carolyn (Campbell) Cox
- Chris Lacinak, AVPreserve
- Meg Phillips, NARA
- Linda Tadic, AudioVi
- Lisa Snider
- Josh Sternfeld, NEH
- Felicity Dytas
- Angelike Contis
- Dina Sokolova
- Mariella Soprano
- Ricc Ferrante, SI
- Carl Fleischhauer, LC
- Kara Van Malssen
Action Items
- If anyone is interested in participating in the Video Deep Dive analysis, please contact Andrea (andrea_goethals@harvard.edu) and Kate (kmur@loc.gov).
- John S. volunteered to take notes on the next call.
- The next call is Monday, Sept. 15, 1-2 pm ET.