NDSA:Meeting Minutes 1-19-11: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m 6 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss: | ''The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:'' | ||
'''JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers''' | '''JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers''' | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--Process: | --Process: | ||
• Poster will highlight two | • Poster will highlight the overall story of digital fragility with two selected data loss story ideas (from those submitted): one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation/call to action in submitting story ideas. | ||
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use: | • Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use: | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly. | • Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly. | ||
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats. | • Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats. | ||
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence. | • Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence. | ||
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware. | |||
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware. | |||
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open. | • Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open. | ||
• Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment | |||
• Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012 | |||
• Submission guidelines from CFP: [http://www.jcdl2012.info/] | |||
'''Video production options/process''' | '''Video production options/process''' | ||
--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc for LIS students | --Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc prepared for LIS students and others who might be able to get involved in story production | ||
--Her first meeting with student groups is next week;she would like to show them the draft JCDL poster abstract to better explain the initiative | |||
--feedback on the message/audience is welcome: are the PSA-type videos aimed at the average person about personal digial archiving? | |||
--Initial thoughts on style: 30 second PSA; Have also seen 5-12 minute preservation and archiving mini-documentaries on YouTube | |||
--this group will approve scripts | |||
--treatment/style will determine what resources will be needed | |||
--producers will have freedom to determine style/message | |||
--Kim is looking for effective video style ideas and research ideas that would inspire producers. Example: [http://vimeo.com/35193889] | |||
--Amanda envisioned videos that would be low-end talking heads | |||
--more of documentary versus scripted; professionally produced is better; we could release a professional piece and then crowdsource comments | |||
--Butch suggests Kickstarter videos are good examples of quick and dirty video advocacy. | |||
--Kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project | |||
--Should we also be asking stakeholders/storytellers for easy, low-end homemade videos? | |||
--On easy story style: Like "I am the 99%"--hold up a piece of paper with a story. |
Latest revision as of 14:19, 11 February 2016
The OWG Storytellers group, Kim Shroeder, Deb Rossum, Amanda French, Butch Lazorchak, Carol Minton Morris (rec), met on Jan. 19 to discuss:
JCDL 2012 poster submission from NDSA Storytellers
--to increase participation: contributing ideas, production
--point out connection between easy-to-understand data loss stories and addressing digital preservation issues
--LOC will co-host JCDL this year, there will be an LOC booth at conference. This presents an opportunity/bandwidth to spread the word about NDSA objectives--why not use it?
--Process:
• Poster will highlight the overall story of digital fragility with two selected data loss story ideas (from those submitted): one about institutional story and one personal story. Abstract will explain why these two examples are of general interest and ask for more participation/call to action in submitting story ideas.
• Kim has gathered some additional data loss facts from her research for possible use:
In a 2011 survey of archivists, 129 responses came in to affirm their concern for the loss of digital media. Below is a list of highlights:
• Sixty-five percent said that obsolescence has affected them directly.
• Sixty percent have content that is NOT accessible in their archive because of software in older formats.
• Fifty-nine percent had material that they were unable to determine the content of because of obsolescence.
• Seventy nine percent had formats that cannot be read because they no longer had access to the hardware.
• Ninety seven percent had media that they can not read/play/open.
• Deb will take a first pass at writing an abstract and circulate for comment
• Deadline for submission is January 30, 2012
• Submission guidelines from CFP: [1]
Video production options/process
--Kim Schroeder presented an overview doc prepared for LIS students and others who might be able to get involved in story production
--Her first meeting with student groups is next week;she would like to show them the draft JCDL poster abstract to better explain the initiative
--feedback on the message/audience is welcome: are the PSA-type videos aimed at the average person about personal digial archiving?
--Initial thoughts on style: 30 second PSA; Have also seen 5-12 minute preservation and archiving mini-documentaries on YouTube
--this group will approve scripts
--treatment/style will determine what resources will be needed
--producers will have freedom to determine style/message
--Kim is looking for effective video style ideas and research ideas that would inspire producers. Example: [2]
--Amanda envisioned videos that would be low-end talking heads
--more of documentary versus scripted; professionally produced is better; we could release a professional piece and then crowdsource comments
--Butch suggests Kickstarter videos are good examples of quick and dirty video advocacy.
--Kim is looking into budget; may want to get into a kickstarter project
--Should we also be asking stakeholders/storytellers for easy, low-end homemade videos?
--On easy story style: Like "I am the 99%"--hold up a piece of paper with a story.