NDSA:Content WG September 7, 2011 Meeting Minutes: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:18, 11 February 2016

Return to NDSA:Content Working Group Home

NDSA Content Meeting Minutes

Wednesday, September 7, 2011 11:00 am ET

Attendees (14)

Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
Downs, Robert | CIESIN, Columbia University | rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu
Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
Grotke, Abbie | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
Hartman, Cathy | Associate Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
Maes, Margaret | Legal Information Preservation Alliance | mkmaes@gmail.com
McAninch, Glen | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
Ogilvie, Kris | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library | kogilvie@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
Rossum, Deborah |Digital Content Manager| SCOLA |712-566-2202| drossum@SCOLA.ORG
Stoller, Michael | New York University | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
Weise, John | Manager of the Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) at the University of Michigan | jweise@UMICH.EDU
Wurl, Joel | National Endowment for the Humanities | jwurl@neh.gov

Local Gov Action Team

Margie talked about the call that the newly formed action team, and how some clarification of what it was they were supposed to be doing was needed. We talked about what was discussed at the breakout table at the July workshop, and really the need is to understand what is at risk in this area. More granularity with local government information categories is needed, there are different issues depending on the local environment. We talked about a survey, that might be useful to get a sense of some of the issues, and whether the states are providing any guidance to local governments about preservation and retention of digital information. Who is thinking about these issues at the state and local levels, and what's being done. Margie pointed out there are existing surveys that have been done; maybe a compilation of those into a list to share with others would be useful. We could capture information and promote as a part of NDSA.

Registry Action Team

Kris and Abbie reported on a call a few weeks back about the survey results and a discussion about the ALA definitions and self assessment. Kris is working on a document to help participants with the self assessment, to describe the various levels and what we mean by them.

Clearinghouse Action Team

No updates from this team.

Blog Preservation Action Team

Kristine and Abbie are hoping to meet soon with a contact at WordPress about a blog preservation plugin. They will report back once that meeting occurs.

Web Archiving Survey

Abbie is still working on the survey. Comments still welcome - the draft is posted to the wiki. She hopes to get it out by the end of September.

Misc.

Joel noted that selection issues kept coming up at the July meetings. When we talk about priorities and things at risk, it's also important to talk about value - what is extremely important to save. This needs to be in the mix, we should continue to keep thinking with this perspective in mind. All agreed that it would be useful to weave this notion into all of our CWG work. We talked a bit about how we might open up the dialog about value with others outside our community, generate input. Cathy suggested a blog post for the NDIIPP blog to talk about selection and value. Joel and Kristine agreed to work on this jointly. Abbie can be the liaison with the blog team at LC; they welcome ideas and contributions from NDSA members. Post should be 500-800 words.

Next Meeting

Our next call will be October 5 at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.

-End-

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Wednesday, September 7, 2011 11:00 am ET
-===Attendees ()===
+===Attendees (14)===
+*Abrams, Brett | National Records and Archives Administration | Brett.Abrams@nara.gov
+*Downs, Robert  | CIESIN, Columbia University  | rdowns@ciesin.columbia.edu
+*Faundeen, John, Archivist | U.S. Geological Survey | faundeen@usgs.gov
 *Grotke, Abbie  | Web Archiving Team Lead, Library of Congress, and Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group  | abgr@LOC.GOV | 202-707-2833 | @agrotke
 *Hanna, Kristine | Internet Archive   | kristine@ARCHIVE.ORG
 *Hartman, Cathy | Associate Dean of Libraries, University of North Texas/ Co-Chair of the NDSA Content Working Group  | cathy.hartman@UNT.EDU
 *Maes, Margaret | Legal Information Preservation Alliance | mkmaes@gmail.com
+*McAninch, Glen  | Kentucky Department for Libraries and Archives  | Glen.McAninch@ky.gov
+*Moffatt, Christie | National Library of Medicine | moffattc@mail.nlm.nih.gov
+*Ogilvie, Kris  | Digital Programs Consultant, California State Library  | kogilvie@LIBRARY.CA.GOV
 *Rossum, Deborah  |Digital Content Manager|  SCOLA  |712-566-2202|  drossum@SCOLA.ORG
+*Stoller, Michael  | New York University  | Michael.stoller@NYU.EDU
 *Weise, John | Manager of the Digital Library Production Service (DLPS) at the University of Michigan  | jweise@UMICH.EDU
+*Wurl, Joel | National Endowment for the Humanities  | jwurl@neh.gov
-==Action Team B: Update on the NDIIPP/NDSA workshop on categories of at-risk content ==
+==Local Gov Action Team==
+Margie talked about the call that the newly formed action team, and how some clarification of what it was they were supposed to be doing was needed. We talked about what was discussed at the breakout table at the July workshop, and really the need is to understand what is at risk in this area. More granularity with local government information categories is needed, there are different issues depending on the local environment. We talked about a survey, that might be useful to get a sense of some of the issues, and whether the states are providing any guidance to local governments about preservation and retention of digital information. Who is thinking about these issues at the state and local levels, and what's being done.  Margie pointed out there are existing surveys that have been done; maybe a compilation of those into a list to share with others would be useful. We could capture information and promote as a part of NDSA.
-The main item to discuss was the workshop and possible next steps.
+==Registry Action Team==
+Kris and Abbie reported on a call a few weeks back about the survey results and a discussion about the ALA definitions and self assessment. Kris is working on a document to help participants with the self assessment, to describe the various levels and what we mean by them.
-For those of us who haven't yet read the notes from the workshop, please do. Abbie sent them out yesterday.
+==Clearinghouse Action Team==
-Kristine and others attending reported out from the workshop. Interesting ideas came out of the workshop to move forward. We need volunteers to step up and help out at this point. We had the workshop to move the discussion forward, to help identify the at-risk categories and refine the list. Examples were shown. We broke up into groups and there were action items identified from each group of where we could go next.
+No updates from this team.
+==Blog Preservation Action Team==
+Kristine and Abbie are hoping to meet soon with a contact at WordPress about a blog preservation plugin. They will report back once that meeting occurs.
-That is a big question for the CWG: what do we want to do next? What are we signing up for? Came out of meeting there were some action items compiled. Reaching out
+==Web Archiving Survey==
-We talked through the action items in the minutes.
+Abbie is still working on the survey. Comments still welcome - the draft is posted to the wiki. She hopes to get it out by the end of September.
-'''State and local:''' Margie sat in on that table and reported out about the discussion. Local government information is a particular concern. Horror stories are really at the local level. Examples from the group: data that appeared on individual’s computers but didn’t realize they had something that wasn’t published elsewhere. Floppy or hard drives. Never preserved. Probably tons of examples. How do we get at that sort of thing? John asked about pre-digital, how was it handled? Is this new to the digital world? Our guess is that it always existed, but with paper content is easier to resurrect. We’re not so sure electronic info is being uncovered when changes take place.
+==Misc.==
-''NEXT STEPS:'' The group supported the idea of a '''new action team''' regarding appraisal of local government information. Margie agreed to lead (with some additional guidance about what the charge of the group will be). Linda and Kitty also agreed to help. Abbie will poll the list to see if others would like to help.
-'''Cultural heritage:''' Kristine reported on on this breakout group. Participants wanted to discuss the clearinghouse, whether we wanted to do that as a group. Is it valuable to have? Concern that initiative might be seen as forcing selecting criteria on institutions. What level should selection policies exist? Overall they thought it was valuable, as long as its enabling and helping. This group was particularly interested in engaging the enthusiasts, passionate folks who want to save creative and cultural content. Consumers and technologists. Get input from creators on what content that should be captured. We talked about working with the outreach working group to come up with a strategy for this. What is this Clearinghouse going to look like? And can it help?
-Margie mentioned that we should also coordinate with the registry group to be sure these two initiatives are in sync.
-''NEXT STEPS:'' Kristine and Christine offered to take some next steps with really thinking about what the Clearinghouse will be. Abbie is also interested and can help be the bridge between the clearinghouse and registry. Kristine will talk to Michael Stoller as well - he was in that group and had some ideas.  Abbie will poll the list to see if others would like to help.
-'''News and Events:''' Abbie reported out. The focus was more on local news and citizen journalism. John Weise mentioned Annarborchronicle.com as example of something potentially at risk in this area. The site is dedicated to city council meetings, writing them up, local government is covered. Published in blog format. We discussed that maybe the  clearinghouse could be a way for people who know about particularly at risk citizen journalism and local news to let us know about – might be something to raise awareness as well. The previous NDIIPP meeting on citizen journalism was brought up, many of the same themes. Again, if we can define the clearinghouse, and have appropriate outreach, we can enable to community to get more involved.
-''NEXT STEPS:'' Abbie and Kristine are going to explore how to enable bloggers to self preserve or identify that they are willing to be preserved. The Wordpress plugin idea - we need to get in touch with the Wordpress guy and other contacts who might help. Abbie and Kristine are going to think about how to move forward. Abbie will poll the list to see if others would like to help. Might need some technical expertise that Abbie and Kristine admit they don't have.
-'''Datasets and directories:''' No one on the call sat in on this breakout group, so we reviewed the minutes.
-Again, encourage citizens and scientists to engage in the discussion about what is at risk. The same theme: connect people through the registry. No action items on this specifically, but work in general on the registry and outreach will be tied into the concerns of this group.
-The group discussed this need for outreach more fully, and the need to coordinate with the Outreach WG. Abbie and Cathy will try to talk with the chairs soon: Butch and Carol. Margie and Deborah have been following what they are doing, but not too active in the other groups. Right now they are focused out outreach to library school community, we think, but building a framework for reaching out to other communities.
-Cultural heritage, data sets and directories. Big issues – major national publicity. Maybe just tie into clearinghouse?
-Briefly we discussed how value of content fits into discussion of at-risk. But this is tricky - one person's valued content is not another persons valued content.
-==Action team B report==
-No updates from Action team B.
+Joel noted that selection issues kept coming up at the July meetings. When we talk about priorities and things at risk, it's also important to talk about value - what is extremely important to save. This needs to be in the mix, we should continue to keep thinking with this perspective in mind. All agreed that it would be useful to weave this notion into all of our CWG work. We talked a bit about how we might open up the dialog about value with others outside our community, generate input. Cathy suggested a blog post for the NDIIPP blog to talk about selection and value. Joel and Kristine agreed to work on this jointly. Abbie can be the liaison with the blog team at LC; they welcome ideas and contributions from NDSA members. Post should be 500-800 words.
 == Next Meeting ==
-Our next call will be September 7 at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.
+Our next call will be October 5 at 11am EST. Agenda and call details to be sent a few days prior.
 -End-