NDSA:Annual Awards Team: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 14:18, 11 February 2016

How can the digital stewardship community do more to recognize and encourage innovation in the field?

This team is planning the first slate of annual awards, to be given out at next years July meeting. The group will pick the specific set of awards we want to accept nominations for, decide on how we want to do nominations, and presumably, make the decisions on who will win the first set of awards. For more information, see this blog post on the awards project.

Working Group Members

Rachel Frick, CLIR, RFrick@CLIR.ORG
Jennifer Ricker, State Library of North Carolina, jennifer.ricker@ncdcr.gov
Jason Kucsma, Metropolitan New York Library Council, jkucsma@metro.org
Barbara Taranto, New York Public Library, btaranto@nypl.org
Jefferson Bailey, Library of Congress, jbailey@loc.gov

Background on Project

That was the central question posed to the participants of And the Winner Is…, a workshop hosted by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance Innovation Working Group at the Make it Work Conference.

Participants in this workshop laid the groundwork for the creation of a slate of awards to recognize achievement in digital preservation. To be clear, this is not about monetary awards. First and foremost, the goal of these awards is to help the membership of the National Digital Stewardship Alliance recognize and encourage innovative and important work in the field.

This post invites you into the conversation and discussion from the workshop. What kinds of awards would help recognize and encourage work with important collections, tools, services, organizations and student projects related to digital stewardship and preservation?

At the workshop, participants proposed some categories for awards. These included awards for research and development, innovative practices and valuable events and meetings. One idea involved the creation of “external awards.” That is, awards which draw attention to work of legislators, researchers or organizations who have made significant impacts on the field, but that are not particularly engaged in the digital preservation community. Along with these ideas, the group was particularly excited about awards to recognize and encourage graduate and undergraduate student work. For example, awards for best student project and or best student paper related to digital stewardship.

Beyond the specifics of any award, the workshop attendees agreed that any awards process must involve transparency and consistency. Further, the group agreed that the particular slate of awards could be flexible and iterative, allowing for the creation and retirement of any individual award on an annual basis.

NDSA:Past Award Ideas

Meeting Minutes

Awards

Awards:

The Annual Innovation Awards were established by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) to recognize and encourage innovation in the field of digital preservation stewardship. These awards highlight and commend creative individuals, projects, organizations, and future stewards demonstrating originality and excellence in their contributions to the field of digital preservation. The program is administered by a committee drawn from members of the NDSA Innovation Working Group.

These awards will focus on recognizing excellence in one or more of the following areas:

Individuals making a significant, innovative contribution to the digital preservation community
Projects whose goals or outcomes represent an inventive, meaningful addition to the understanding or processes required for successful, sustainable digital preservation stewardship
Organizations taking an innovative approach to providing support and guidance to the digital preservation community
Future stewards, especially students, but including educators, trainers, or curricular endeavors taking a creative approach to advancing knowledge of digital preservation issues and practices

Eligibility:

Nominations are open to any individual and anyone can be nominated for one of the four awards. Simply put, anyone can nominate anyone and anything. There are no restrictions on affiliation of individuals, time frame of projects or activities, organization type, or student, educator, or program status.

Nomination Requirements:

Nominators need to provide:

Description: A brief, one-paragraph description of the individual, project, organization, or future steward being nominated and their contribution to digital preservation stewardship. Also please include any relevant URLs, publications, or other documentation or proof of their activities.
Justification: A brief, one-paragraph justification explaining why the nominee merits recognition and how they contributed to innovation in digital preservation stewardship.
Contact Information: Nominee contact information, especially an email address. For projects and organizations, a point person’s contact information, email address at minimum, is required.
Submission: Email the above information to ndsa@loc.gov with “Awards Nomination” in the email subject line.
Nominator: Name, email and, if desired, affiliation and a brief description, of the person making the nomination. This information will be kept confidential.

Sponsor and Prize:

The Annual Innovation Awards are sponsored by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance, a member organization committed to managing digital content for current and long-term use. The National Digital Stewardship Alliance was launched in July 2010 as an initiative of the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, which Congress established in 2000 and the Library of Congress administers.

[This paragraph is still in draft form. Language will need to be confirmed within LC]. The award winners will receive a plaque presented to them at the NDSA/NDIIPP Partners meeting at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. on July 24-26, 2012. The award includes travel costs to Washington D.C. for winners to attend this meeting to accept the award and winners will be asked to deliver a brief presentation on their work as part of a panel of awards winners. [need to confirm the details of the panel presentation with the meeting planning committee].

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 How can the digital stewardship community do more to recognize and encourage innovation in the field?
+This team is planning the first slate of annual awards, to be given out at next years July meeting. The group will pick the specific set of awards we want to accept nominations for, decide on how we want to do nominations, and presumably, make the decisions on who will win the first set of awards. For more information, see this blog post on the awards project.
+==Working Group Members==
+* Rachel Frick, CLIR, RFrick@CLIR.ORG
+* Jennifer Ricker, State Library of North Carolina, jennifer.ricker@ncdcr.gov
+* Jason Kucsma, Metropolitan New York Library Council, jkucsma@metro.org
+* Barbara Taranto, New York Public Library, btaranto@nypl.org
+* Jefferson Bailey, Library of Congress, jbailey@loc.gov
+==Background on Project==
 That was the central question posed to the participants of And the Winner Is…, a workshop hosted by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance Innovation Working Group at the Make it Work Conference.
@@ Line 11: / Line 22: @@
 Beyond the specifics of any award, the workshop attendees agreed that any awards process must involve transparency and consistency. Further, the group agreed that the particular slate of awards could be flexible and iterative, allowing for the creation and retirement of any individual award on an annual basis.
-==Next Steps==
+[[NDSA:Past Award Ideas]]
+==Meeting Minutes==
+*[[NDSA:Tuesday, January 17, 2012]]
+*[[NDSA:Wednesday, December 21, 2011]]
+*[[NDSA:Monday, November 21, 2011]]
+==Awards==
+Awards:
-As a next step, the NDSA innovation working group is convening an action team to create, accept nominations for, and ultimately give out the inaugural set of awards at next years meeting.
+The Annual Innovation Awards were established by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) to recognize and encourage innovation in the field of digital preservation stewardship. These awards highlight and commend creative individuals, projects, organizations, and future stewards demonstrating originality and excellence in their contributions to the field of digital preservation. The program is administered by a committee drawn from members of the NDSA Innovation Working Group.
-You can expect to hear more about the awards, and the process for nomination, on this blog. If you are interested in being involved in this initiative, contact the innovation working group co-chairs. If your organization is not an NDSA member, consider joining the Alliance.
+These awards will focus on recognizing excellence in one or more of the following areas:
+*Individuals making a significant, innovative contribution to the digital preservation community
+*Projects whose goals or outcomes represent an inventive, meaningful addition to the understanding or processes required for successful, sustainable digital preservation stewardship
+*Organizations taking an innovative approach to providing support and guidance to the digital preservation community
+*Future stewards, especially students, but including educators, trainers, or curricular endeavors taking a creative approach to advancing knowledge of digital preservation issues and practices
-With that said, the easiest way to be involved in this process is to simply share your ideas for awards in the comments to this post.
+Eligibility:
-To kick off the conversation, below are some example ideas of the kinds of awards in the categories workshop participants discussed. Which of these seem like good ideas to you? What do you think we need to do a better job recognizing? We would be thrilled if you would take a few minutes to share your thoughts in the comments on this post.
+*Nominations are open to any individual and anyone can be nominated for one of the four awards. Simply put, anyone can nominate anyone and anything. There are no restrictions on affiliation of individuals, time frame of projects or activities, organization type, or student, educator, or program status.
-==Examples of sustainability-focused awards==
+Nomination Requirements:
-*Most successful stewardship of an “at risk” content collection
-*Most creative approach to sustainability for a new content collection
-*Most creative approach to sustainability for an existing content collection
-*Best focus on use of standards in content stewardship
-*Best vision of sustainability in digital stewardship
-*Best use of collaboration in supporting collections
-*Best approach to new funding resources
-*Real world reliability of long-term storage: recognizing digital collections stewarded over a long time
-==Examples of content-focused awards==
+Nominators need to provide:
-*Most unusual new collection under stewardship
+*Description: A brief, one-paragraph description of the individual, project, organization, or future steward being nominated and their contribution to digital preservation stewardship. Also please include any relevant URLs, publications, or other documentation or proof of their activities.
-*Most unusual existing collection under stewardship
+*Justification: A brief, one-paragraph justification explaining why the nominee merits recognition and how they contributed to innovation in digital preservation stewardship.
-*Most innovative user interface to a digital collection
+*Contact Information: Nominee contact information, especially an email address. For projects and organizations, a point person’s contact information, email address at minimum, is required.
-*Best new collection in a specific format type
+*Submission: Email the above information to ndsa@loc.gov with “Awards Nomination” in the email subject line.
-*Best existing collection in a specific format type
+*Nominator: Name, email and, if desired, affiliation and a brief description, of the person making the nomination. This information will be kept confidential.
-*Best approach to highlighting or providing more visibility to a collection
-*Best vision of content development for the future
-*Good migrations: award for system and format migrations
-==Examples of Organization-Focused Awards==
+Sponsor and Prize:
-*Most creative approach to a new collection under stewardship
-*Most creative approach to an existing collection under stewardship
-*Best new collection under stewardship by a small public library
-*Best new collection under stewardship by a non-library organization
-*Best new collection under stewardship by a state library organization
-*Best business models for funding preservation and access to public goods
-*Winning legal strategies: recognizing legal strategies for enabling long term access in face of short-term copyright, IP and confidentiality restrictions
-==Examples of student awards==
+The Annual Innovation Awards are sponsored by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance, a member organization committed to managing digital content for current and long-term use. The National Digital Stewardship Alliance was launched in July 2010 as an initiative of the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, which Congress established in 2000 and the Library of Congress administers.
-*Best student paper related to digital stewardship
-*Best new collection student project
-*Most important contribution from a student fellow or intern to a digital stewardship initiative
-So, what do you think? Are any of these ideas and categories particularly interesting to you? What awards would you want to see?
+[This paragraph is still in draft form. Language will need to be confirmed within LC].
+The award winners will receive a plaque presented to them at the NDSA/NDIIPP Partners meeting at the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. on July 24-26, 2012. The award includes travel costs to Washington D.C. for winners to attend this meeting to accept the award and winners will be asked to deliver a brief presentation on their work as part of a panel of awards winners. [need to confirm the details of the panel presentation with the meeting planning committee].