View source for NDSA:Annual Awards Team

How can the digital stewardship community do more to recognize and encourage innovation in the field?

This team is planning the first slate of annual awards, to be given out at next years July meeting. The group will pick the specific set of awards we want to accept nominations for, decide on how we want to do nominations, and presumably, make the decisions on who will win the first set of awards. For more information, see this blog post on the awards project.

==Working Group Members==
* Rachel Frick, CLIR, RFrick@CLIR.ORG
* Jennifer Ricker, State Library of North Carolina, jennifer.ricker@ncdcr.gov
* Jason Kucsma, Metropolitan New York Library Council, jkucsma@metro.org
* Barbara Taranto, New York Public Library, btaranto@nypl.org
* Jefferson Bailey, Library of Congress, jbailey@loc.gov

==Background on Project==

That was the central question posed to the participants of And the Winner Is…, a workshop hosted by the National Digital Stewardship Alliance Innovation Working Group at the Make it Work Conference.

Participants in this workshop laid the groundwork for the creation of a slate of awards to recognize achievement in digital preservation. To be clear, this is not about monetary awards. First and foremost, the goal of these awards is to help the membership of the National Digital Stewardship Alliance recognize and encourage innovative and important work in the field.

This post invites you into the conversation and discussion from the workshop. What kinds of awards would help recognize and encourage work with important collections, tools, services, organizations and student projects related to digital stewardship and preservation?

At the workshop, participants proposed some categories for awards. These included awards for research and development, innovative practices and valuable events and meetings. One idea involved the creation of “external awards.”  That is, awards which draw attention to work of legislators, researchers or organizations who have made significant impacts on the field, but that are not particularly engaged in the digital preservation community. Along with these ideas,  the group was particularly excited about awards to recognize and encourage graduate and undergraduate student work. For example, awards for best student project and or best student paper related to digital stewardship.

Beyond the specifics of any award, the workshop attendees agreed that any awards process must involve transparency and consistency. Further, the group agreed that the particular slate of awards could be flexible and iterative, allowing for the creation and retirement of any individual award on an annual basis.

==Meeting Minutes==
*[[NDSA:Monday, November 21, 2011]]

==Awards Ideas==
The NDSA innovation working group has convened an action team to create, accept nominations for, and ultimately give out the inaugural set of awards at next years meeting. You can expect to hear more about the awards and the process for nomination. With that said, an easy way to be involved in this process is to simply share your ideas for awards on the wiki. Below are some example ideas of the kinds of awards in the categories workshop participants discussed. Which of these seem like good ideas to you? What do you think we need to do a better job recognizing? We would be thrilled if you would take a few minutes to share your thoughts.

==Examples of sustainability-focused awards==
*Most successful stewardship of an “at risk” content collection
*Most creative approach to sustainability for a new content collection
*Most creative approach to sustainability for an existing content collection
*Best focus on use of standards in content stewardship
*Best vision of sustainability in digital stewardship
*Best use of collaboration in supporting collections
*Best crowd-sourcing projects or tools
*Most interesting migration or emulation project
*Best approach to new funding resources
*Real world reliability of long-term storage: recognizing digital collections stewarded over a long time

==Examples of content-focused awards==
*Most unusual new collection under stewardship
*Most unusual existing collection under stewardship
*Most innovative user interface to a digital collection
*Best new collection in a specific format type
*Best existing collection in a specific format type
*Best approach to highlighting or providing more visibility to a collection
*Best vision of content development for the future
*Good migrations: award for system and format migrations

==Examples of Organization-Focused Awards==
*Most creative approach to a new collection under stewardship
*Most creative approach to an existing collection under stewardship
*Best new collection under stewardship by a small public library
*Best new collection under stewardship by a non-library organization
*Best new collection under stewardship by a state library organization
*Best business models for funding preservation and access to public goods
*Winning legal strategies: recognizing legal strategies for enabling long term access in face of short-term copyright, IP and confidentiality restrictions
*Taking initiative: stewardship activities by non-typical stewards
*Best outreach activities to educate others on digital stewardship (most creative or most far-reaching)
*Best digital stewardship higher-education program or professor

==Examples of student awards==
*Best student paper related to digital stewardship
*Best new collection student project
*Most important contribution from a student fellow or intern to a digital stewardship initiative
*Best or most innovative pedagogical initiative fostering digital preservation
*Rising star award (could be awarded based on achievement in one or more of the areas listed above)