Labor/Valuing-Labor/2019-10-04

From DLF Wiki
Revision as of 19:56, 13 October 2019 by Adw (talk | contribs) (Notes from the Labor WG call 2019-10-04)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

DLF WG on Labor in Digital Libraries, Archives and Museums: Valuing Labor Subgroup

Meeting minutes: October 4, 2019

Building a working group initiative around an issue

Facilitator/Note-taker: Amy Wickner

Complete 2019 schedule

Background

Prompt: What is one concrete, collective action that you would like the working group to take up in 2020?

To understand where we are as a group, you might draw upon:

Discussion

Gathering data to make a case for anecdotal stories we hear about labor issues → what next to make real & lasting change across LAM?

  • SAA Issues & Advocacy section interested in contingent labor in archives
  • Lit review → basically nothing
  • Survey, SAA-funded with consulting firm out of price range so DIY
  • Shared out at SAA, will present at DLF
  • Who else do you want to see this data?
    • SAA doesn’t want to serve as repository so sharing out with anyone who asks
    • No IRB approval so can’t publish
    • Have discussed as section coming up with best practices doc
    • Not sure how much power we have as a section to enact change profession-wide

How can we help people gain the skills to understand what power they have and organize a campaign to actually push back?

  • Having moved into admin position & sitting with more people in admin/managerial positions, talking about institutional constraints
  • Could be an advocacy toolkit but not necessarily
  • Lots of (mis)perceptions about where you can/can’t push back v. if you talk to your HR it might not be a policy, maybe can actually be changed
  • Feels like it’s beyond the scope of our grant bc lots of work but maybe something this group could think about doing
  • The more people doing this kind of work the better but still struggling to see how we can build more connections, power together
  • Even if groups focus on different aspects, intentional plan for addressing issues
  • Tired of people accepting constraints as norms!!!!!! They’re norms for reasons because people don’t think they can be changed

Start at the top with funders, change perceptions where the $ comes from

  • Numbers might make sense but morality of practices is off, short-term
  • Lots of grants depend on low costs for labor so that more $ goes to digitization & preservation
  • Became director & flipped budget towards staff from preservation - important to acknowledge the people behind the work
    • 10-year-old program of all contract workers
    • Important to say what the situation is and ask whether it’s sustainable (it’s not)
  • Norms that funders expect is tied to “well this is how much they cost” i.e. low-paid workers
  • Where do guidelines originate? How can we change them?
  • Prison labor to digitize has happened in California -- “Why don’t we just outsource this work?”
    • Leads on what vendors, sponsors, funder orgs are pushing this kind of thing? Separate investigation!
  • In Collective Responsibility grant, funders raised the need for an appendix or standard for addressing labor in grant applications
    • Institutions can reference
    • Matter of adjusting expectations, shift to value labor rather than “cost-effectiveness”
    • Meaningful that we can connect funders to information!
    • The more people recognize it as a problem the better

Data collection related to Organized Labor goals in the Valuing Labor research agenda

  • Digital library workers’ involvement in organized labor
  • Developing a list of unions, and compiling resources for digital library workers interested in organized labor to inform themselves and participate.
  • Could the salary spreadsheets that have been floating around might fit in with this?
  • Potential overlap / collaboration with Information Maintainers

What comes out of the Collective Responsibility Forum?

  • Lots more than we can finish on the grant project
  • Want to revisit some of those, what does that look like & what makes most sense to people who are here?
  • How to tackle HR on stuff?
  • Search committee → recommendation → what if HR won’t budge on the salary range?
    • Offering comparable pay to other parts of the country without taking cost of living into account
  • What if not enough transparency about what exactly happens in the hiring process?
  • It would be great to compile data on all of these institutional failures in the hiring/recruitment and retention of LAM workers - we should share these stories

Success stories

Collecting examples of identifying a problem and making a change

Develop a topic from the Valuing Labor research agenda

Impacts of automation on the classification of digital library workers

Logistics & announcements

Labor-related sessions at DLF

Next meeting Monday 11/4, 3pm ET / 12pm PT - Internal & external advocacy

Retrieved from "https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Labor/Valuing-Labor/2019-10-04&oldid=14810"