Labor/Valuing-Labor/2017-09-20

From DLF Wiki
Revision as of 00:30, 28 March 2018 by Adw (talk | contribs) (Adding redacted minutes from September 20, 2017 group call)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

DLF WG on Labor in Digital Libraries, Archives and Museums: Valuing Labor Subgroup

Meeting minutes: September 20, 2017

Note-taker: Melissa Chalmers. Names redacted.

Check-ins & Discussion

Librarians' status as faculty

  • [At one institution] put in place some infrastructure for supporting and promoting professional track faculty
    • Fight at document level of policy making
    • Need to make things explicit, e.g. need for mentorship
  • [At another institution] Went through process of clarifying librarian status as non-TT faculty.
    • Mentorship is something that hasn’t been part of process, expectation of providing mentors only now being discussed.
    • Recently: lay-offs, two staff and three librarian positions lost, so mentorship may not be on the agenda at the moment.
  • [At another institution] Finally on track to get new faculty policy approved and ratified
    • Pushback on peer review in the hiring process.
      • Large number of librarians in different types of jobs and lack of confidence that there’s a useful definition of librarian work that could assess across all the types of jobs.
    • Talk of limiting contract positions to 3 years, then making permanent.
      • Will be interesting, given the increasing reliance on contract labor for things like maintenance and repair.
      • To date little enforcement or standardization on contract limits because no ratified policy.
      • One department has 30 librarians whose contracts need to be renewed every year or two, their voices are not often heard.
  • [At another institution] We are all on annual contracts!
    • That’s why we are all vulnerable to system wide cuts.
    • Protected TT faculty, non-TT faculty vulnerable.
    • Colleague of 38 years said this is the first time where they did not renew contracts bc of budget issues.
    • Leadership trying to define system, consistencies across units (e.g. annual contracts, three year contracts, expectations of renewals).
    • Interested to hear comparison from other universities
    • Sounds like how they handle grant-funded positions, at end of which ask can we hire this person or do they have to find another position.

Workplace climate surveys & feedback mechanisms

  • Striking difference between faculty, staff in terms of satisfaction about transparency, equity, fairness, hierarchy (staff less satisfied)
  • Some people report not feeling sense of belonging, librarians of color have met with the dean, reaching out to staff too
  • Staff not feeling empowered, no feedback mechanism for supervisors; class environment, inconsistencies in supervision.
  • Need feedback mechanism for institutional culture, sense that currently not solving the right problem.
  • How to better create an equitable environment, empower the voices of our staff here?
  • In process of setting up meetings to create measures; librarians of color meeting, trying to provide feedback at the supervisor level
    • Generalized to all supervisors, not identifiable
    • Staff level employees of color are vulnerable, easily exposed.
    • Hoping to create widely available supervisor feedback mechanism, lower risks of reporting and create holistic assessment process.
    • Feedback can be tricky in general:
      • e.g. when there are one or a few faculty members
      • Challenges of generalizing feedback mechanisms in small departments where there is only one person in any given job

Student workers

  • Coordinator at a branch library gave feedback at library governance meeting on behalf of student workers
    • Called for greater awareness of student workers as laborers, elevate voices, respect time
    • Reaction was shock/surprise by audience
  • “Have a student worker do it” phrase
    • Hearing it more lately, what does that mean?
    • What are we saying about the work or the worker?
    • Someone has to do the grunt tasks, unless it can be automated or scripted away.
    • Can repetition be automated, or is it something that needs one on one engagement?
    • Reflection on student library worker experience: adding 0’s to film catalog entries, editing every single record individually -- probably there was a more efficient, external workflow available for that.
  • Creating digital collections
    • How do we treat or interact with graduate student workers?
    • Ethics of care/feminist framing
  • Student hiring process
    • Ended up interviewing the same people that everyone else did, as revealed while chatting with other units hiring student workers.
    • Should there be guidelines in place to avoid this?
    • What are the criteria here and why are we all interviewing the same people?
    • Are there particular kinds of work experience that are transferrable?
    • Are there other ways to encourage diversity, open mindedness in the hiring process?

How to make strategic efforts worthwhile to people in the trenches?

  • Meeting of library, library IT staff for strategic planning
    • Disconnect between what management wants to talk about and staff accomplishing specific tasks.
  • Long standing thoughts about the library profession as a whole & its veneration of a service ethic
    • Not trying to suggest service is the wrong term, but presents problems, especially when interacting with faculty, seems like it puts library workers at disadvantage for these interactions.
    • Trying to sort through thoughts on this, role of archivists and librarians particularly in academic (DH) projects.
    • What does it mean to be a service professional in the library and archives sector?
      • Who are we serving or working with?
      • How does “care work” get acknowledged by faculty, students, or administrators?
      • Trying to figure out an identifiable role for libraries (and librarians?) in the research process

What kind of labor is appropriate for different situations, level, benefits and challenges?

  • What should we be providing the person, what are the challenges we are facing, what cost to us?
  • Focusing on experiential learning opportunities
  • Example: Digital stewardship or digital library related work relevant for practicum students (120 hours)
    • Reasonable investment for us, but they're also getting something out of it.
    • Does this fit into what this group is doing? (Yes)

Readings & Resources

Kaetrena Davis Kendrick, “The Low Morale Experience of Academic Librarians: A Phenomenological Study,” Journal of Library Administration 57, no. 8 (2017): 846-878. doi:10.1080/01930826.2017.1368325

  • low morale of librarians, workplace culture, and the labor issues there

Todd Suomela, Florence Chee, Bettina Berendt and Geoffrey Rockwell, “GamerGate and Digital Humanities: Applying an Ethics of Care to Internet Research,” CSDH/SCHN 2017

Labor WG Zotero group/library

Academic Archivist/Librarian Reading Calendar by Eira Tansey

Labor-Related Sessions at 2017 DLF Forum

Valuing Labor panel accepted! Thank you, presenters & proposal editors https://dlfforum2017.sched.com/event/Bzsg

Labor WG working breakfast ☕ https://dlfforum2017.sched.com/event/Bzt8

Other sessions related to valuing labor

Logistics

Standing meeting on the 3rd Wednesday of each month.

Next meeting November 15.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Labor/Valuing-Labor/2017-09-20&oldid=13483"