Openlab Workshop Report - Revision history

Wayne: /* Notes */

2018-08-08T21:29:41Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 8 August 2018
Line 270:		Line 270:
	----		----
	=Notes=		=Notes=
	[[#note1]]1. A workshop participant made this statement during the Unconference, and it resurfaced as a theme in the workshop. Adrienne Russell expanded on this statement further in her post-workshop blog. See: Russell, Adrienne. 2015. “The Problem is in the Room.” Blog post. ''Council on Library and Information Resources//. http:''connect.clir.org/blogs/adrianne-russell/2015/12/17/the-problem-is-in-the-room.		[[#note1]]1. A workshop participant made this statement during the Unconference, and it resurfaced as a theme in the workshop. Adrienne Russell expanded on this statement further in her post-workshop blog. See: Russell, Adrienne. 2015. “The Problem is in the Room.” Blog post. ''Council on Library and Information Resources''. [http://connect.clir.org/blogs/adrianne-russell/2015/12/17/the-problem-is-in-the-room http://connect.clir.org/blogs/adrianne-russell/2015/12/17/the-problem-is-in-the-room].

	[[#note2]]2. To make generic by means of templates. The term is used frequently in computer programming. Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/templatize.		[[#note2]]2. To make generic by means of templates. The term is used frequently in computer programming. Wiktionary [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/templatize https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/templatize].

Wayne: /* Group 2 */

2018-08-08T21:28:07Z

Group 2

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 8 August 2018
Line 215:		Line 215:
	This group identified three ways Openlab might bring about change in the GLAM community.		This group identified three ways Openlab might bring about change in the GLAM community.

	* ~~'''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~Identify problems whose solutions have a “multiplier effect” ~~</span>'''~~		* Identify problems whose solutions have a “multiplier effect”
	~~> <span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~Projects that can be scaled quickly, and across a large swath of GLAMs, would help Openlab meet its goal to increase the rate of change and transformation in this sector. Openlab might identify such projects by:		** Projects that can be scaled quickly, and across a large swath of GLAMs, would help Openlab meet its goal to increase the rate of change and transformation in this sector. Openlab might identify such projects by:
	~~> -~~ Conducting an environmental scan of the sector to identify problems, gaps, and needs that are amenable to large-scale solutions. This scan might start with existing cultural heritage labs – identifying the extent and range of their work – and branch out to other sectors of the community.		** Conducting an environmental scan of the sector to identify problems, gaps, and needs that are amenable to large-scale solutions. This scan might start with existing cultural heritage labs
	~~> -~~ Identifying situations that have had a multiplier effect elsewhere, and reverse engineering the process to examine what problem was solved, how the solution was developed and implemented, and how it might be replicated in the context of the GLAM community. </span>		** identifying the extent and range of their work – and branch out to other sectors of the community.
	* ~~'''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~Showcase transformative work underway in GLAMs ~~</span>'''~~		** Identifying situations that have had a multiplier effect elsewhere, and reverse engineering the process to examine what problem was solved, how the solution was developed and implemented, and how it might be replicated in the context of the GLAM community. </span>
	~~> <span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~Openlab might tell the story of intriguing work and experimentation underway in the GLAM sector – e.g., open data projects, new tools developed to help users engage with GLAMs and their collections, new presentation modes, etc. – in a more high profile, journalistic fashion. By shining a spotlight on inspirational work in the GLAM community, Openlab could reach broader audiences, inspiring the public to engage with their cultural heritage in more meaningful ways.~~</span>~~		* Showcase transformative work underway in GLAMs
	* ~~'''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~Build a set of minimal viable metadata that will enhance discoverability. ~~</span>'''~~		** Openlab might tell the story of intriguing work and experimentation underway in the GLAM sector – e.g., open data projects, new tools developed to help users engage with GLAMs and their collections, new presentation modes, etc. – in a more high profile, journalistic fashion. By shining a spotlight on inspirational work in the GLAM community, Openlab could reach broader audiences, inspiring the public to engage with their cultural heritage in more meaningful ways.
	~~> <span style="line-height: 1.5;">~~A plethora of digital material exists in GLAMs, but it is encased in “dirty” or insufficient metadata that hinders discoverability. Openlab might address this issue by identifying a minimum set of viable metadata that would yield the greatest discoverability, and promote use of this “set” across the GLAM community. ~~</span>~~		* Build a set of minimal viable metadata that will enhance discoverability.
			** A plethora of digital material exists in GLAMs, but it is encased in “dirty” or insufficient metadata that hinders discoverability. Openlab might address this issue by identifying a minimum set of viable metadata that would yield the greatest discoverability, and promote use of this “set” across the GLAM community.

	=3. Next Steps for Moving Openlab Forward=		=3. Next Steps for Moving Openlab Forward=

Wayne: /* Focused Conversations: A Sectional Review of the Openlab Concept Statement */

2018-08-08T21:23:51Z

Focused Conversations: A Sectional Review of the Openlab Concept Statement

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 8 August 2018
Line 193:		Line 193:
	>		>
	''Openlab Collaborative (paragraph 7)''		''Openlab Collaborative (paragraph 7)''
	With dozens of cultural heritage labs working in isolation, Openlab’s call for a collaborative or “co-op” of labs to work on common problems was roundly endorsed. But individual labs will need capacity ''and// a champion such as Openlab who can get them to work collaboratively. Openlab might play the role of convener here, bringing labs together around a common problem, and getting commitments from them to dedicate a portion of their staff time/space/funding to work towards a solution. Innovation challenges (such as the [[http:''www.xprize.org/\|XPrize competition]]) might be a catalyst that could rally labs to work collaboratively around grand challenges.		With dozens of cultural heritage labs working in isolation, Openlab’s call for a collaborative or “co-op” of labs to work on common problems was roundly endorsed. But individual labs will need capacity ''and// a champion such as Openlab who can get them to work collaboratively. Openlab might play the role of convener here, bringing labs together around a common problem, and getting commitments from them to dedicate a portion of their staff time/space/funding to work towards a solution. Innovation challenges (such as the [http://www.xprize.org/ XPrize competition]) might be a catalyst that could rally labs to work collaboratively around grand challenges.

	''Openlab Network (paragraph 8)''		''Openlab Network (paragraph 8)''
	Participants were supportive of Openlab’s plan for a network of training and assistance that would increase capacity across the GLAM sector. In developing this network, they advised Openlab to target existing research initiatives and distribute their results more broadly, and to consider model programs such as [[https:''outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence\|Wikipedians in Residence]] and the [[http:''www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/~~%20\|~~National Digital Stewardship Residency]] when crafting new training initiatives. They cautioned against Openlab sponsoring a new set of conferences, suggesting instead that any workshops or training events be offered within or alongside existing GLAM conferences.		Participants were supportive of Openlab’s plan for a network of training and assistance that would increase capacity across the GLAM sector. In developing this network, they advised Openlab to target existing research initiatives and distribute their results more broadly, and to consider model programs such as [https://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedian_in_Residence Wikipedians in Residence] and the [http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ndsr/ National Digital Stewardship Residency] when crafting new training initiatives. They cautioned against Openlab sponsoring a new set of conferences, suggesting instead that any workshops or training events be offered within or alongside existing GLAM conferences.

	==Sprints 4 and 5: Delving Into Scope==		==Sprints 4 and 5: Delving Into Scope==

Wayne: /* The Goal and Process */

2018-08-08T21:22:29Z

The Goal and Process

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 8 August 2018
Line 46:		Line 46:
	==The Goal and Process==		==The Goal and Process==

	The goal of the Openlab workshop meeting was to clarify the scope and magnitude of what is needed to accelerate change in the GLAM community, and to outline a way forward in this process. Underlying this goal was the question of whether the [[Openlab ~~concept~~]], as expressed in verbal and written form, identified a viable pathway for addressing the need, and if not, what alternative solutions might be developed.		The goal of the Openlab workshop meeting was to clarify the scope and magnitude of what is needed to accelerate change in the GLAM community, and to outline a way forward in this process. Underlying this goal was the question of whether the [[Openlab Concept]], as expressed in verbal and written form, identified a viable pathway for addressing the need, and if not, what alternative solutions might be developed.

	To encourage a high level of participant engagement and reduce meeting fatigue, the workshop was divided into a series of timed “sprints.” The goal of the first sprint was to foster an esprit de corps and draw out detailed personal observations about the Openlab concept through extensive participant introductions. Attendees introduced themselves, summarized their professional backgrounds, and expressed their hopes for, and concerns about, the broad issues that Openlab seeks to address.		To encourage a high level of participant engagement and reduce meeting fatigue, the workshop was divided into a series of timed “sprints.” The goal of the first sprint was to foster an esprit de corps and draw out detailed personal observations about the Openlab concept through extensive participant introductions. Attendees introduced themselves, summarized their professional backgrounds, and expressed their hopes for, and concerns about, the broad issues that Openlab seeks to address.

Wayne: /* Openlab as a New Way Forward */

2018-08-08T21:21:37Z

Openlab as a New Way Forward

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 8 August 2018
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Spearheaded by digital strategist and Council of Library and Information Resources (CLIR) Distinguished Fellow Michael Edson, the Openlab concept received formal support in July of 2015, when CLIR received funding through a cooperative agreement from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Office of Digital Humanities and Division of Public Programs to host a series of events where the Openlab concept could be explored further.		Spearheaded by digital strategist and Council of Library and Information Resources (CLIR) Distinguished Fellow Michael Edson, the Openlab concept received formal support in July of 2015, when CLIR received funding through a cooperative agreement from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Office of Digital Humanities and Division of Public Programs to host a series of events where the Openlab concept could be explored further.

	Openlab’s first day of events took place at a hotel conference facility in Arlington, VA and included a public [[~~openlabworkshop/~~Unconference Sessions\|Unconference]] and [[~~openlabworkshop/~~Ignite talks\|Ignite talks]] designed to generate ideas and solicit participation from a broad spectrum of GLAM stakeholders. The dialogues that emerged from this day were continued and examined more deeply in a follow-up meeting (structured in a smaller workshop setting) that was held on the second day at the offices of the American Alliance of Museums.		Openlab’s first day of events took place at a hotel conference facility in Arlington, VA and included a public [[Unconference Sessions\|Unconference]] and [[Ignite talks\|Ignite talks]] designed to generate ideas and solicit participation from a broad spectrum of GLAM stakeholders. The dialogues that emerged from this day were continued and examined more deeply in a follow-up meeting (structured in a smaller workshop setting) that was held on the second day at the offices of the American Alliance of Museums.

	The Unconference sessions addressed far-reaching topics such as funding and sustainability in GLAMs; issues for small and start-up organizations; communities of practice; the politics of change in nonprofits; community engagement; partnerships; solving the “grand challenges” that threaten our world; and the purpose and potential of GLAM Labs. The Ignite talks presented perspectives of 15 GLAM professionals who spoke about issues of social justice in museum practice; engaging global communities of learners; bringing GLAM data to life in new ways; getting GLAMs to look outward; and rethinking the concept of “museum time.” Several individuals proposed innovative ways for GLAMs to participate in education (e.g., “Smithsonian High,” sensory learning), and offered case studies demonstrating how hacking, historical preservation, and personal archiving can support and engage local communities.		The Unconference sessions addressed far-reaching topics such as funding and sustainability in GLAMs; issues for small and start-up organizations; communities of practice; the politics of change in nonprofits; community engagement; partnerships; solving the “grand challenges” that threaten our world; and the purpose and potential of GLAM Labs. The Ignite talks presented perspectives of 15 GLAM professionals who spoke about issues of social justice in museum practice; engaging global communities of learners; bringing GLAM data to life in new ways; getting GLAMs to look outward; and rethinking the concept of “museum time.” Several individuals proposed innovative ways for GLAMs to participate in education (e.g., “Smithsonian High,” sensory learning), and offered case studies demonstrating how hacking, historical preservation, and personal archiving can support and engage local communities.

Edsonm: Imported from Wikispaces

2016-12-21T20:48:49Z

Imported from Wikispaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 21 December 2016
Line 22:		Line 22:
	The idea for Openlab emerged from several years of work, collaboration, and discussion with people trying to bring the concepts and practices of ‘new technology’ into the work and thinking of GLAMs.		The idea for Openlab emerged from several years of work, collaboration, and discussion with people trying to bring the concepts and practices of ‘new technology’ into the work and thinking of GLAMs.

	There is broad consensus in the GLAM sector that GLAMs are struggling with technology and change. Many Openlab Workshop attendees and stakeholders feel that GLAMs are conservative, 1950s-style institutions that often wrap themselves in a veneer of 21st century technologies but don’t understand or utilize these technologies to their full extent. They acknowledge that GLAMs have created exciting and innovative projects, but these initiatives have had little lasting impact sector-wide. For many attendees and stakeholders, GLAMs are not leveraging their use of		There is broad consensus in the GLAM sector that GLAMs are struggling with technology and change. Many Openlab Workshop attendees and stakeholders feel that GLAMs are conservative, 1950s-style institutions that often wrap themselves in a veneer of 21st century technologies but don’t understand or utilize these technologies to their full extent. They acknowledge that GLAMs have created exciting and innovative projects, but these initiatives have had little lasting impact sector-wide. For many attendees and stakeholders, GLAMs are not leveraging their use of technology to address the grand challenges of our time, and thus are not on the forefront of work that affects the public good.
	technology to address the grand challenges of our time, and thus are not on the forefront of work that affects the public good.

	Attendees also assert that the GLAM community suffers from its own “digital divide” between institutions who have the capacity and expertise to explore technologies and those who do not. The latter have few opportunities to leverage the knowledge and work taking place elsewhere in the sector. Many GLAMs never even hear about these efforts.		Attendees also assert that the GLAM community suffers from its own “digital divide” between institutions who have the capacity and expertise to explore technologies and those who do not. The latter have few opportunities to leverage the knowledge and work taking place elsewhere in the sector. Many GLAMs never even hear about these efforts.

Edsonm: Imported from Wikispaces

2016-07-07T13:54:16Z

Imported from Wikispaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 7 July 2016
Line 142:		Line 142:

	''Dualities''		''Dualities''
			<span style="line-height: 1.5;">A “read-through” of the statement prompted a series of questions about Openlab’s proposed role and scope. These questions often were framed in oppositional pairings to describe the range of options. For example, should Openlab be:</span>
	A “read-through” of the statement prompted a series of questions about Openlab’s proposed role and scope. These questions often were framed in oppositional pairings to describe the range of options. For example, should Openlab be:

	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">An advocate of institutions OR of users? </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">An advocate of institutions OR of users? </span>
Line 160:		Line 159:

	''Refining the vision''		''Refining the vision''
			<span style="line-height: 1.5;">For many participants, ideas about what Openlab “could be” reinforced their sense that its broad vision (“to accelerate the speed and impact of transformational change in the GLAM sector”) must be formulated as actionable problems before the concept can move forward.</span>
	For many participants, ideas about what Openlab “could be” reinforced their sense that its broad vision (“to accelerate the speed and impact of transformational change in the GLAM sector”) must be formulated as actionable problems before the concept can move forward.

	Openlab was challenged to undertake an exercise whereby it would articulate the change it wants to see, the problems that prevent that change, and the tactics (or action plans) needed to solve those problems. This exercise would help clarify Openlab’s value proposition, which is critical to its success in seeking financing, enlisting GLAM support, and demonstrating importance to a broader public. (After the conclusion of the workshop, these ideas were published in a slideshow titled, “[[http://www.slideshare.net/edsonm/how-change-happens\|How Change Happens—The Openlab Change Model]].”)		Openlab was challenged to undertake an exercise whereby it would articulate the change it wants to see, the problems that prevent that change, and the tactics (or action plans) needed to solve those problems. This exercise would help clarify Openlab’s value proposition, which is critical to its success in seeking financing, enlisting GLAM support, and demonstrating importance to a broader public. (After the conclusion of the workshop, these ideas were published in a slideshow titled, “[[http://www.slideshare.net/edsonm/how-change-happens\|How Change Happens—The Openlab Change Model]].”)

	''Openlab's Audience''		''Openlab's Audience''
			<span style="line-height: 1.5;">Participants felt that Openlab must appeal to and serve three major groups:</span>
	Participants felt that Openlab must appeal to and serve three major groups:

	* GLAMs		* GLAMs
Line 220:		Line 217:

	* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">Identify problems whose solutions have a “multiplier effect” </span>'''		* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">Identify problems whose solutions have a “multiplier effect” </span>'''
	> <span style="line-height: 1.5;">Projects that can be scaled quickly, and across a large swath of GLAMs, would help Openlab meet its goal to increase the rate of change and transformation in this sector. Openlab might identify such projects by:		> <span style="line-height: 1.5;">Projects that can be scaled quickly, and across a large swath of GLAMs, would help Openlab meet its goal to increase the rate of change and transformation in this sector. Openlab might identify such projects by:
	> - Conducting an environmental scan of the sector to identify problems, gaps, and needs that are amenable to large-scale solutions. This scan might start with existing cultural heritage labs – identifying the extent and range of their work – and branch out to other sectors of the community.		> - Conducting an environmental scan of the sector to identify problems, gaps, and needs that are amenable to large-scale solutions. This scan might start with existing cultural heritage labs – identifying the extent and range of their work – and branch out to other sectors of the community.
	> - Identifying situations that have had a multiplier effect elsewhere, and reverse engineering the process to examine what problem was solved, how the solution was developed and implemented, and how it might be replicated in the context of the GLAM community. </span>		> - Identifying situations that have had a multiplier effect elsewhere, and reverse engineering the process to examine what problem was solved, how the solution was developed and implemented, and how it might be replicated in the context of the GLAM community. </span>
	* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">Showcase transformative work underway in GLAMs </span>'''		* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">Showcase transformative work underway in GLAMs </span>'''

Edsonm: Imported from Wikispaces

2016-06-26T17:57:22Z

Imported from Wikispaces

Show changes

Edsonm: Imported from Wikispaces

2016-06-26T17:56:45Z

Imported from Wikispaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 26 June 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~A Report on the Openlab Workshop~~
	~~December 1-2, 2015~~
	~~Arlington, Virginia~~

	Written for the [[http://clir.org\|Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)]]		<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">A Report on the Openlab Workshop</span>
	Diane M. Zorich Cultural Heritage Consultant		<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">December 1-2, 2015 </span>
			<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">Arlington, Virginia </span>

			<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">Written for the [[http://clir.org\|Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)]]</span>
			<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">Diane M. Zorich Cultural Heritage Consultant</span>

			<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">Authored March 18, 2016</span>
			<span style="display: block; text-align: center;">Posted June 26, 2016 by [[user:edsonm]]</span>


	~~Authored March 18, 2016~~
	~~Posted June 26, 2016 by [[user:edsonm]]~~

	=About this Report=		=About this Report=

Edsonm: Imported from Wikispaces

2016-06-26T17:53:02Z

Imported from Wikispaces

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 26 June 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Arlington, Virginia		Arlington, Virginia

	Written for the Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)		Written for the [[http://clir.org\|Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR)]]
	Diane M. Zorich Cultural Heritage Consultant		Diane M. Zorich Cultural Heritage Consultant

Line 10:		Line 10:

	=About this Report=		=About this Report=
	This report summarizes and synthesizes the discussions that took place at the Openlab Workshop held on December 1-2, 2015 in Arlington, Virginia. It focuses primarily on the second day of the event, which was held at the offices of the American Alliance of Museums ~~[[[Openlab Workshop Report#note1\|Note 1]]]~~.		This report summarizes and synthesizes the discussions that took place at the Openlab Workshop held on December 1-2, 2015 in Arlington, Virginia. It focuses primarily on the second day of the event, which was held at the offices of the American Alliance of Museums.

	Sources used to develop this report include the author’s own “real-time” notes, audio and written transcripts of discussions from Day 2 of the event, social media feeds and blog postings that document the event, and post-workshop discussions with Openlab’s organizers.		Sources used to develop this report include the author’s own “real-time” notes, audio and written transcripts of discussions from Day 2 of the event, social media feeds and blog postings that document the event, and post-workshop discussions with Openlab’s organizers.
Line 101:		Line 101:

	* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">The echo chamber </span>'''		* '''<span style="line-height: 1.5;">The echo chamber </span>'''
	> GLAM audiences are a mirror reflection of GLAMs themselves, with little diversity of people and opinions. Participants characterized GLAMs as “echo chambers,” holding conversations that are self-serving and ideologically “safe.” Indeed, the attendees at Openlab events were not spared this characterization, with one participant forcefully commenting that “the problem is in the ~~room.”~~ [[[Openlab Workshop Report#~~note2~~\|~~Note 2~~]]] Transformative change will not be possible until GLAMs address their homogenous workplaces, acknowledge that this homogeneity hinders their capacity for public dialogue and engagement, and develop an inclusive workforce that represents the diversity of people and voices in our society.		> GLAM audiences are a mirror reflection of GLAMs themselves, with little diversity of people and opinions. Participants characterized GLAMs as “echo chambers,” holding conversations that are self-serving and ideologically “safe.” Indeed, the attendees at Openlab events were not spared this characterization, with one participant forcefully commenting that “the problem is in the room” [[[Openlab Workshop Report#note1\|note 1]]]. Transformative change will not be possible until GLAMs address their homogenous workplaces, acknowledge that this homogeneity hinders their capacity for public dialogue and engagement, and develop an inclusive workforce that represents the diversity of people and voices in our society.
	* '''Dichotomies'''		* '''Dichotomies'''
	> GLAMs are pulled in different directions by opposing forces.		> GLAMs are pulled in different directions by opposing forces.
Line 154:		Line 154:
	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A place that compiles and shares the work of other labs and funder-supported programs OR a research and development (R&D) lab that does its own experimental work? </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A place that compiles and shares the work of other labs and funder-supported programs OR a research and development (R&D) lab that does its own experimental work? </span>
	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">An organization that helps GLAMs “on the margins” OR an intermediary that connects these GLAMs to existing labs and programs who can help them? </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">An organization that helps GLAMs “on the margins” OR an intermediary that connects these GLAMs to existing labs and programs who can help them? </span>
	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A creator of transformative projects OR an entity that “templatizes” [[[Openlab Workshop Report#~~note3~~\|~~Note~~ 3]]] the transformative projects of others (so they gain greater traction across the GLAM sector?) </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A creator of transformative projects OR an entity that “templatizes” [[[Openlab Workshop Report#not2\|note 3]]] the transformative projects of others (so they gain greater traction across the GLAM sector?) </span>
	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A builder of infrastructure and scaffolding for GLAMs OR a service organization that trains GLAMs to build this infrastructure themselves? </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A builder of infrastructure and scaffolding for GLAMs OR a service organization that trains GLAMs to build this infrastructure themselves? </span>
	* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A facilitator who helps GLAMs embrace change OR a coordinator who helps GLAMs get out of their way? </span>		* <span style="line-height: 1.5;">A facilitator who helps GLAMs embrace change OR a coordinator who helps GLAMs get out of their way? </span>
Line 275:		Line 275:
	----		----
	=Notes=		=Notes=
	[[#note1]]1. A ~~parallel and complementary effort will focus on~~ the Unconference and ~~Ignite talks that began~~ the workshop on ~~December 1st~~. See the ~~Openlab wiki at https:~~//~~openlabworkshop~~.~~wikispaces~~.~~com for more information~~.		[[#note1]]1. A workshop participant made this statement during the Unconference, and it resurfaced as a theme in the workshop. Adrienne Russell expanded on this statement further in her post-workshop blog. See: Russell, Adrienne. 2015. “The Problem is in the Room.” Blog post. ''Council on Library and Information Resources//. http:''connect.clir.org/blogs/adrianne-russell/2015/12/17/the-problem-is-in-the-room.

	[[#note2]]2. A workshop participant made this statement during the Unconference, and it resurfaced as a theme in the workshop. Adrienne Russell expanded on this statement further in her post-workshop blog. See: Russell, Adrienne. 2015. “The Problem is in the Room.” Blog post. ''Council on Library and Information Resources//. http:''connect.clir.org/blogs/adrianne-russell/2015/12/17/the-problem-is-in-the-room.		[[#note2]]2. To make generic by means of templates. The term is used frequently in computer programming. Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/templatize.

	~~[[#note3]]3~~. To make generic by means of templates. The term is used frequently in computer programming. Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/templatize.