NDSA:October 24, 2012 Standards Working Group Notes - Revision history

Dlfadm: 5 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:19:38Z

5 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Andrea goethals: /* Closing */

2012-10-26T17:47:37Z

Closing

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:47, 26 October 2012
Line 37:		Line 37:
	=== Closing ===		=== Closing ===
	* No new project ideas yet.		* No new project ideas yet.
	* Stephen mentioned the Academic Trust ~~Initiative~~ and DPN, both of which Columbia is involved in		* Stephen mentioned the Academic Preservation Trust (APTrust) and DPN, both of which Columbia is involved in.
			** (After the call we found out that APTrust is "committed to the creation and management of a preservation repository that will aggregate academic and research content from many institutions" and has a web site at [http://academicpreservationtrust.org/]
	* There was some discussion of TDRs and assessments. NARA is starting a self-assessment.		* There was some discussion of TDRs and assessments. NARA is starting a self-assessment.
	* In the Innovation WG people are giving reports on what's going on in their institutions. Maybe we could do something similar related to certifications or assessments.		* In the Innovation WG people are giving reports on what's going on in their institutions. Maybe we could do something similar related to certifications or assessments.
	* The Earth Science institute at Columbia has been doing (or did?) a self-certification for ISO x and it didn't go very well.		* The Earth Science institute at Columbia has been doing (or did?) a self-certification for ISO x and it didn't go very well.
	* We all said bye to Jimi and wished him luck at Hampshire College.		* We all said bye to Jimi and wished him luck at Hampshire College.

Andrea goethals: /* Wiki Project */

2012-10-26T17:07:46Z

Wiki Project

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:07, 26 October 2012
Line 32:		Line 32:

	=== Wiki Project ===		=== Wiki Project ===
	* Andrea discussed at a Coordinating Committee call the possibility that we might want help from others in advancing this project to the stage where we could begin publicizing it. (This was based on concern that Columbia is currently shouldering most of the work of this project).		* Andrea discussed at a Coordinating Committee call the possibility that we might want help from others in advancing this project to the stage where we could begin publicizing it. (This was based on concern that Columbia is currently shouldering most of the work of this project and we don't want to take advantage of their good will).
	* Stephen suggested that they continue to work on the revamping of the digital preservation article until December when we can take a vision check-in. He thinks we should wait to publicize it broader until the new article structure is in place. They will throw up a flare when they need help with particular things. They are OK for now on finding sources to cite. They would like the group help reviewing the work as they complete it. One thing we will need to consider at some point is how much we want to try to keep to our outlined strategy and how much we are willing to let others morph it independently of our project.		* Stephen suggested that they continue to work on the revamping of the digital preservation article until December when we can take a vision check-in. He thinks we should wait to publicize it broader until the new article structure is in place. They will throw up a flare when they need help with particular things. They are OK for now on finding sources to cite. They would like the group's help reviewing the work as they complete it. One thing we will need to consider at some point is how much we want to try to keep to our outlined strategy and how much we are willing to let others morph it independently of our project.

	=== Closing ===		=== Closing ===

Andrea goethals: /* Staffing Survey */

2012-10-26T17:06:22Z

Staffing Survey

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 26 October 2012
Line 21:		Line 21:
	* Linda will report back on the results of talking about this on an upcoming panel.		* Linda will report back on the results of talking about this on an upcoming panel.
	* a PDF of the poster was put on the public Standards & Practices WG web page. If anyone would like the poster in a different format/version contact Kate.		* a PDF of the poster was put on the public Standards & Practices WG web page. If anyone would like the poster in a different format/version contact Kate.
	* we will want to archive and preserve the survey data, possibly in the ICPSR data repository. Stephen suggested we preserve the poster		* we will want to archive and preserve the survey data, possibly in the ICPSR data repository. Stephen suggested also we preserve the poster. Winston volunteered to work on this with someone else.
	* repeat this in a few years (but making changes based on lessons learned from this iteration)		* repeat this in a few years (but making changes based on lessons learned from this iteration)
	* those who took the survey, and those who worked on it, should jot down what we would want to change fairly soon while it's fresh in our minds		* those who took the survey, and those who worked on it, should jot down what we would want to change fairly soon while it's fresh in our minds

Andrea goethals at 17:05, 26 October 2012

2012-10-26T17:05:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 26 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~NDSA Standards and Practices Working Group~~		== WebEx meeting notes, October 24, 2012 ==
	WebEx meeting notes, October 24, 2012

	Attending: Jimi Jones, Andrea Goethals(note taker), Meg Philips, Carol Kussman, Kate Murray, Stephen Davis, Dina Sokolova, Midge Coates, Karen Cariani, Linda Tadic, Kelcy Shepherd, Winston Atkins.		Attending: Jimi Jones, Andrea Goethals(note taker), Meg Philips, Carol Kussman, Kate Murray, Stephen Davis, Dina Sokolova, Midge Coates, Karen Cariani, Linda Tadic, Kelcy Shepherd, Winston Atkins.
	(Apologies if I have left anyone out, please feel free to add your name.)		'''(Apologies if I have left anyone out, please feel free to add your name.)'''

	~~Meeting will be recorded. No objections noted.~~

	The WebEx recording can be found here: TBD		The WebEx recording can be found here: TBD

			=== Opening ===
	2 new members introduced themselves:		2 new members introduced themselves:
	* Kelcy Shepherd, Five Colleges, Inc. / University of Massachusetts Amherst		* Kelcy Shepherd, Five Colleges, Inc. / University of Massachusetts Amherst
Line 15:		Line 13:
	Jimi reminded us that it this was his last meeting as co-chair and that Kate Zwaard from the Library of Congress would be the next co-chair starting next month. Jimi will continue to participate in the NDSA in the Content Working Group and will attend the Partners meetings.		Jimi reminded us that it this was his last meeting as co-chair and that Kate Zwaard from the Library of Congress would be the next co-chair starting next month. Jimi will continue to participate in the NDSA in the Content Working Group and will attend the Partners meetings.

	~~'''~~Staffing Survey'''		=== Staffing Survey ===
			Recognition of Kate's great work on the poster.
	Follow up:		Follow up:
	* possible article in David Anderson's (Univ. of Portsmouth) new journal		* possible article in David Anderson's (Univ. of Portsmouth) new journal
Line 26:		Line 25:
	* those who took the survey, and those who worked on it, should jot down what we would want to change fairly soon while it's fresh in our minds		* those who took the survey, and those who worked on it, should jot down what we would want to change fairly soon while it's fresh in our minds

	~~'''~~iPRES Conference~~'''~~		=== iPRES Conference ===
	* Andrea will send around to the group her conference highlights		* Andrea will send around to the group her conference highlights
	* Stephen found the difference between the large web archiving projects and Columbia's experience striking		* Stephen found the difference between the large web archiving projects and Columbia's experience striking
Line 32:		Line 31:
	* Several liked Andy Jackson's format study. Stephen said this calls into question what exactly obsolescence means.		* Several liked Andy Jackson's format study. Stephen said this calls into question what exactly obsolescence means.

	~~'''~~Wiki Project~~'''~~		=== Wiki Project ===
	* Andrea ~~said that she~~ discussed at a Coordinating Committee call the possibility that we might want help from others in advancing this project to the stage where we could begin publicizing it. (This was based on concern that Columbia is currently shouldering most of the work of this project).		* Andrea discussed at a Coordinating Committee call the possibility that we might want help from others in advancing this project to the stage where we could begin publicizing it. (This was based on concern that Columbia is currently shouldering most of the work of this project).
	* Stephen ~~and Dina~~ suggested that they continue to work on the revamping of the digital preservation article until December~~, and that they would flow~~ up a flare when they need help with particular things. They would like ~~us to~~ help ~~review their~~ work. ~~Some things~~ we will need to consider ~~are~~ how much we want to try to keep to our strategy and how much we are willing to let others ~~decide~~ independently of our project.		* Stephen suggested that they continue to work on the revamping of the digital preservation article until December when we can take a vision check-in. He thinks we should wait to publicize it broader until the new article structure is in place. They will throw up a flare when they need help with particular things. They are OK for now on finding sources to cite. They would like the group help reviewing the work as they complete it. One thing we will need to consider at some point is how much we want to try to keep to our outlined strategy and how much we are willing to let others morph it independently of our project.
	* ~~Dina~~ and ~~Stephen updated us~~ on their ~~work~~.
			=== Closing ===
			* No new project ideas yet.
			* Stephen mentioned the Academic Trust Initiative and DPN, both of which Columbia is involved in
			* There was some discussion of TDRs and assessments. NARA is starting a self-assessment.
			* In the Innovation WG people are giving reports on what's going on in their institutions. Maybe we could do something similar related to certifications or assessments.
			* The Earth Science institute at Columbia has been doing (or did?) a self-certification for ISO x and it didn't go very well.
			* We all said bye to Jimi and wished him luck at Hampshire College.

Andrea goethals: Created page with 'NDSA Standards and Practices Working Group WebEx meeting notes, October 24, 2012 Attending: Jimi Jones, Andrea Goethals(note taker), Meg Philips, Carol Kussman, Kate Murray, Ste…'

2012-10-25T19:57:46Z

Created page with 'NDSA Standards and Practices Working Group WebEx meeting notes, October 24, 2012 Attending: Jimi Jones, Andrea Goethals(note taker), Meg Philips, Carol Kussman, Kate Murray, Ste…'

New page

NDSA Standards and Practices Working Group
WebEx meeting notes, October 24, 2012

Attending: Jimi Jones, Andrea Goethals(note taker), Meg Philips, Carol Kussman, Kate Murray, Stephen Davis, Dina Sokolova, Midge Coates, Karen Cariani, Linda Tadic, Kelcy Shepherd, Winston Atkins.
(Apologies if I have left anyone out, please feel free to add your name.)

Meeting will be recorded. No objections noted.

The WebEx recording can be found here: TBD

2 new members introduced themselves:
* Kelcy Shepherd, Five Colleges, Inc. / University of Massachusetts Amherst
* Winston Atkins, Duke University Libraries

Jimi reminded us that it this was his last meeting as co-chair and that Kate Zwaard from the Library of Congress would be the next co-chair starting next month. Jimi will continue to participate in the NDSA in the Content Working Group and will attend the Partners meetings.

'''Staffing Survey'''
Follow up:
* possible article in David Anderson's (Univ. of Portsmouth) new journal
* Christoph Becker is conducting the same survey for a UN members workshop which will primarily have European participants.
* Produce a full report of the results (will aim to produce this by next March). Meg, Andrea (and Carol after the call) volunteered to work on this report.
* Linda will report back on the results of talking about this on an upcoming panel.
* a PDF of the poster was put on the public Standards & Practices WG web page. If anyone would like the poster in a different format/version contact Kate.
* we will want to archive and preserve the survey data, possibly in the ICPSR data repository. Stephen suggested we preserve the poster
* repeat this in a few years (but making changes based on lessons learned from this iteration)
* those who took the survey, and those who worked on it, should jot down what we would want to change fairly soon while it's fresh in our minds

'''iPRES Conference'''
* Andrea will send around to the group her conference highlights
* Stephen found the difference between the large web archiving projects and Columbia's experience striking
* Meg found interesting the dynamic between the pure researchers and practitioners, in particular the TIMBUS project brought this to light
* Several liked Andy Jackson's format study. Stephen said this calls into question what exactly obsolescence means.

'''Wiki Project'''
* Andrea said that she discussed at a Coordinating Committee call the possibility that we might want help from others in advancing this project to the stage where we could begin publicizing it. (This was based on concern that Columbia is currently shouldering most of the work of this project).
* Stephen and Dina suggested that they continue to work on the revamping of the digital preservation article until December, and that they would flow up a flare when they need help with particular things. They would like us to help review their work. Some things we will need to consider are how much we want to try to keep to our strategy and how much we are willing to let others decide independently of our project.
* Dina and Stephen updated us on their work.