NDSA:May 2012 - Revision history

Dlfadm: 10 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:19:27Z

10 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Abgr: /* Action Items */

2012-05-14T19:42:55Z

Action Items

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 14 May 2012
Line 57:		Line 57:
	Michael will take a stab at writing a "vision" statement and will distribute to this group for comment.		Michael will take a stab at writing a "vision" statement and will distribute to this group for comment.

	Abbie will work on a map of the various activities and distribute so we can see the state of the state.		Abbie will work on a map of the various activities and distribute so we can see the state of the state, and members can sign up to monitor activities.

	~~Abbie~~ will ~~distribute to this~~ group ~~so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.~~		And, maybe someone will think of a better name for our group?

	~~NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.~~

Abgr at 19:41, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T19:41:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 14 May 2012
Line 58:		Line 58:

	Abbie will work on a map of the various activities and distribute so we can see the state of the state.		Abbie will work on a map of the various activities and distribute so we can see the state of the state.




	Abbie will distribute to this group so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.		Abbie will distribute to this group so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.

	NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.		NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.

Abgr: /* Progress of Content Teams/Action Teams */

2012-05-14T19:21:27Z

Progress of Content Teams/Action Teams

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 14 May 2012
Line 45:		Line 45:
	The Content Working Group’s current scope of work is to:		The Content Working Group’s current scope of work is to:
	A) Develop or contribute to a registry of content already preserved by NDSA members.		A) Develop or contribute to a registry of content already preserved by NDSA members.
	B) Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:		B) Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:
	Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.		Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.
	Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.		Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.
	Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.''		Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.''

	==NDSA meeting in July==		==NDSA meeting in July==

Abgr at 19:16, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T19:16:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 14 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Meeting May 14 - DRAFT		Meeting May 14 - DRAFT

			==Attendees==

	*Cathy Hartman		*Cathy Hartman
Line 8:		Line 10:
	*Rachel Frick		*Rachel Frick

	~~Role of the big picture group - panopticon~~		==Agenda==
			*Discussion of the role of this group
	Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the ~~big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.~~		*Update on the progress of the content teams
			*Planning for the NDSA/NDIIPP summer meeting
	~~Smaller group to take an interest - a bit~~ of ~~a conceptual "exec. committee". Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process.~~

	~~Exec. committee not the right term really - concerned that wholistic view would be lost. Not a coordinating~~ group~~. A group to take a look at the whole picture of content.~~

	~~Noticing things that the larger group may want to take~~ on.

	~~An extra brain or eye for~~ the ~~group. What is the strategic vision~~ of the ~~group?~~

	~~Suggestions:~~
	~~Map of activities across~~ the ~~groups - road map~~
	~~Shared sense of what we're working towards - helping to frame work of this group~~
	~~quarterly, we could spend some time looking at what's happening, seeing where natural alliances might occur. get people to work together where they are not.~~
	~~Looking at where there are no activities and find out what why,~~

	~~each member~~ of this group~~, report back? each of the big picture sign up for particular threads or groups to watch. defined areas of observation to track.~~		==Discussion of the role of this group==

	~~meet quarterly?~~		To get us started discussing why we formed this group, Michael said that when we began talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - though necessary to do to engage people - he had concerns that there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Team activities. That sparked the idea for this group.

	~~track~~ things ~~outside of NDSA~~		We talked about the role of this group - not quite an executive committee. There is value in the smaller groups focusing in on specific topics, but also valuable to have one group "stand back and squint" at whole process, to provide a holistic view. The idea is that this is not a coordinating group but a group to take a look at the whole picture of content. This group may notice things that the larger CWG may want to take on; can serve as an extra brain or eye for the CWG.

	~~this group can help bring in outside prospective - has an ear to events outside the NDSA - can bring that in, things in community and users of content.~~		Suggestions for a strategic vision emerged during discussion:

	Keeping an eye on the whole, higher level. each takes on a section or activities and report back to the group, offer ideas. With an eye to the outside. Issues arising in larger community.		*Map of activities across the groups to help this group see what's going on across the board
			*Shared sense of what we're working towards - helping to frame work of this group
			*We could spend some time looking at what's happening, seeing where natural alliances might occur. get people to work together where they are not.
			*Looking at where there are no activities occurring and explore what why
			*Help bring in outside prospective - has an ear to events outside the NDSA - can bring that in, things in community and users of content.
			*Keeping an eye on the whole, higher level. each takes on a section or activities and report back to the group, offer ideas. With an eye to the outside. Issues arising in larger community.
			*Make sure things that are need to get discussed are being discussed.
			*Having a pulse on the work that's happening but understanding the impact of the work on our groups and others.
			*There is overlap with other groups outside of NDSA, need to be in tune with that.
			*Longer term view, help connecting people.

	~~Make sure things that are need to get discussed are being discussed.~~

	~~Similar discussions in DPLA~~. ~~People focused on~~ the ~~work~~, ~~not time~~ to ~~look up and out~~.		We decided to meet quarterly. Each member of this group will "sign up" to keep an eye out for a content team, action team, or other CWG thread or activity, and report back quarterly. Using the road map of activities, we'll have defined areas of observation to track.

	~~Having a pulse on the work that's happening but understanding the impact~~ of ~~the work on our groups and others.~~		==Progress of Content Teams/Action Teams==

	~~there is overlap~~ with ~~other groups, need~~ to ~~be in tune with that~~. ~~And not loose site of why we are doing this~~.		Abbie gave a brief update at a very high level of the content teams - all have met but getting the word out on the wiki and list isn't streamlined yet. Will work to get something from them quarterly. There are concerns about next steps with Registry team and how to properly describe our activities now. Current statement needs refreshing. It says now:

	~~easier to solve the immediate problems sometimes. need~~ a ~~longer term view, help connecting people.~~		Current scope of work, needs reworking and we talked about this group helping craft a new statement:

	~~Michael~~ will ~~take~~ a ~~stab~~ at ~~writing a scope note~~ and ~~will distribute~~.		The Content Working Group’s current scope of work is to:
			A) Develop or contribute to a registry of content already preserved by NDSA members.
			B) Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:
			Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.
			Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.
			Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.''

	~~Work out over email what~~ the teams ~~are~~, ~~state of the state - concept of map of what's happening~~ with ~~the Content Teams~~.		==NDSA meeting in July==
			We'll be having an in-person meeting July 24th in the morning. Also a poster on the content teams, which we may need some help with.

	~~Abbie will work on a map of the various activities, updates from the~~		==Action Items==

	~~Current scope of work, needs reworking:~~		Michael will take a stab at writing a "vision" statement and will distribute to this group for comment.

	~~The Content Working Group’s current scope~~ of ~~work is to:~~		Abbie will work on a map of the various activities and distribute so we can see the state of the state.

	~~A) Develop or contribute to a registry of content already preserved by NDSA members.~~

	~~B) Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:~~

	~~Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.~~
	~~Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.~~
	~~Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.~~

	Abbie will distribute to this group so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.		Abbie will distribute to this group so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.

	NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.		NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.

Abgr at 16:33, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T16:33:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 14 May 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Meeting May 14		Meeting May 14 - DRAFT

	Cathy		*Cathy Hartman
	Abbie		*Abbie Grotke
	Abby R		*Abby Rumsey
	Michael Stoller		*Michael Stoller
	Joel Wurl		*Joel Wurl
	Rachel Frick		*Rachel Frick

	Role of the big picture group - ~~panoptican~~		Role of the big picture group - panopticon

	Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.		Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.
Line 64:		Line 64:
	Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.		Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.

	~~Joel~~ will ~~help reworks~~.		Abbie will distribute to this group so we can work on redoing the "scope" statement.

	NDSA meeting in July, 24 in morning.		NDSA CWG meeting in July, 24 in morning.

Abgr at 16:29, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T16:29:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 14 May 2012
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Abbie will work on a map of the various activities, updates from the		Abbie will work on a map of the various activities, updates from the

			Current scope of work, needs reworking:

			The Content Working Group’s current scope of work is to:

			A) Develop or contribute to a registry of content already preserved by NDSA members.

			B) Develop a clearinghouse that will enable a variety of stakeholders (content producers, archives and libraries and other potential preservationists) to:

			Determine what specific types of content or collections are at risk.
			Identify at-risk content or collections for preservation.
			Match orphan collections with appropriate trusted partner for access and preservation.

			Joel will help reworks.

			NDSA meeting in July, 24 in morning.

Abgr at 16:25, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T16:25:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:25, 14 May 2012
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Rachel Frick		Rachel Frick

	Role of the big picture group		Role of the big picture group - panoptican

	Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.		Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.
Line 40:		Line 40:
	Similar discussions in DPLA. People focused on the work, not time to look up and out.		Similar discussions in DPLA. People focused on the work, not time to look up and out.

	Having a pulse on the work that's happening but understanding the impact of the work.		Having a pulse on the work that's happening but understanding the impact of the work on our groups and others.

			there is overlap with other groups, need to be in tune with that. And not loose site of why we are doing this.

			easier to solve the immediate problems sometimes. need a longer term view, help connecting people.

			Michael will take a stab at writing a scope note and will distribute.

			Work out over email what the teams are, state of the state - concept of map of what's happening with the Content Teams.

			Abbie will work on a map of the various activities, updates from the

Abgr at 16:17, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T16:17:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 14 May 2012
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Michael Stoller		Michael Stoller
	Joel Wurl		Joel Wurl
	Rachel		Rachel Frick

	Role of the big picture group		Role of the big picture group
Line 31:		Line 31:

	track things outside of NDSA		track things outside of NDSA

			this group can help bring in outside prospective - has an ear to events outside the NDSA - can bring that in, things in community and users of content.

			Keeping an eye on the whole, higher level. each takes on a section or activities and report back to the group, offer ideas. With an eye to the outside. Issues arising in larger community.

			Make sure things that are need to get discussed are being discussed.

			Similar discussions in DPLA. People focused on the work, not time to look up and out.

			Having a pulse on the work that's happening but understanding the impact of the work.

Abgr at 16:13, 14 May 2012

2012-05-14T16:13:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 14 May 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Abbie		Abbie
	Abby R		Abby R
	Michael		Michael Stoller
	Joel		Joel Wurl
			Rachel

	Role of the big picture group		Role of the big picture group

	~~Executive committee?~~ Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.		Concern from Michael at the time since we were talking about breaking up the larger group into more specific areas/groups - necessary to do to engage people - then there would be less opportunity for the discussion of the big picture, overseeing the entire Content Teams.

	Smaller group to take an interest - a bit of a conceptual exec. committee. Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process.		Smaller group to take an interest - a bit of a conceptual "exec. committee". Valuable to focus in, but valuable to stand back and squint at whole process.

			Exec. committee not the right term really - concerned that wholistic view would be lost. Not a coordinating group. A group to take a look at the whole picture of content.

			Noticing things that the larger group may want to take on.

			An extra brain or eye for the group. What is the strategic vision of the group?

			Suggestions:
			Map of activities across the groups - road map
			Shared sense of what we're working towards - helping to frame work of this group
			quarterly, we could spend some time looking at what's happening, seeing where natural alliances might occur. get people to work together where they are not.
			Looking at where there are no activities and find out what why,

			each member of this group, report back? each of the big picture sign up for particular threads or groups to watch. defined areas of observation to track.

			meet quarterly?

			track things outside of NDSA