https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=NDSA%3AMarch_18%2C_2013_Standards_Working_Group_Notes 2026-05-10T18:18:46Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.44.0 https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=NDSA:March_18,_2013_Standards_Working_Group_Notes&diff=5391&oldid=prev 2016-02-11T19:19:57Z

<p>1 revision imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress</p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 15:19, 11 February 2016</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="4" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr> <!-- diff cache key wiki_production-dlfwiki_:diff:1.41:old-5390:rev-5391 --> </table>

Dlfadm https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=NDSA:March_18,_2013_Standards_Working_Group_Notes&diff=5390&oldid=prev 2013-03-18T19:56:01Z

<p>Created page with &#039;Monday (3/18/13) at 1 p.m. EDT (GMT -04:00) Attendees: Emily Shaw, Andrea Goethals, Butch Lazorchak, Carl Fleischhauer, Carol Kussman, Dinal Sokolova, John Spencer, Karen Carian…&#039;</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Monday (3/18/13) at 1 p.m. EDT (GMT -04:00)<br /> <br /> Attendees: Emily Shaw, Andrea Goethals, Butch Lazorchak, Carl Fleischhauer, Carol Kussman, Dinal Sokolova, John Spencer, Karen Cariani, Kate Murray, Midge Coates, Sheila Morrissey, Winston Atkins, Amy Kirchhoff<br /> <br /> #New member introduction: None<br /> #New projects: <br /> #*Digital Preservation Certifications<br /> #**Nancy McGovern –ready to start having calls with people who are interested in participating<br /> #***Winston Atkins, Amy Kirchhoff, Emily Shaw, Kate Zwaard expressed interest<br /> #**Andrea – scoping question – Will this cover mainly formal certifications, or also include maturity models, levels of preservation?<br /> #***Nancy is particularly interested in self-assessment and options for peer reviewed audit, not just formal audit<br /> #***Needs to be encouraging, not prohibitive<br /> #**John Spencer – from employer perspective, adds to CV and qualifications of folks doing this work<br /> #**Nancy had a call with Courtney Mumma (Archivematica) – Archivematica is interested in hosting a Drupal-based TRAC review, will start a pilot May-August with two different institutions (one archive and one research library)<br /> #***Process to map out what a peer-review audit process for digital repositories would look like<br /> #***Peer review process = host institution rotates, other institutions participate in the review<br /> #****Potentially low-cost way to go from self-assessment to audit<br /> #***Mary Vardigan – Data Seal of Approval – transitioning from Board of Reviewers to a more community model; community starts to take over peer review activities to make it sustainable<br /> #***Andrea asks if this would be FOS, like other Archivematica’s products<br /> #****Nancy thinks so, but would need to confirm<br /> #***Nancy offered to host a Webex walk-through of the TRAC certification<br /> #*Digital Preservation metrics – Annie Peterson (Tulane) and Helen Bailey (MIT) joined the call to ask group about metrics related to digital preservation<br /> #** Background on ARL Preservation Statistics<br /> #*** Collected 1999-2008 - asked budget, staffing, conservation statistics, binding, microfilming<br /> #*** Useful for comparing preservation activities across institutions, but always imperfect<br /> #**** In particular, digital preservation, AV, disaster – none were included<br /> #***Drawing on 2010 Lars Meyer ARL report (Safeguarding Collections at the Dawn of the 21st Century: http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/safeguarding-collections.pdf), ALA/ALCTS/PARS is working on a survey to fill the void left when ARL stopped collection these stats<br /> #***Annie and Helen walked group through survey draft preview, particularly Section 6: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2012-preservation-of-access-PREVIEW <br /> #****A few suggestions:<br /> #***** Content size, rather than number of items for various types of content might be more meaningful, easier to know<br /> #***** Audit? might be too soon<br /> #***** Outsourcing vs. in-house<br /> #***** Question 6 currently excludes all institutions that do not have a digital repository; might rethink/reword this<br /> #**Contact for Annie Peterson: epeters5@tulane.edu <br /> #***Feedback would be most useful by March 25th<br /> #Update on projects:<br /> #*PDF/A-3 Charter<br /> #**Sheila Morrissey <br /> #***meeting of PDF/A experts at recent DPC meeting in Leeds (http://www.dpconline.org/events/details/55-DPC_PDFA3_briefing?xref=58)<br /> #***recognized that they have some seriously confused use cases<br /> #***report will be written up about that meeting – will distributed<br /> #****no solution as yet, “need to do some education”<br /> #*WikiProject (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_preservation)<br /> #**Dina sent recent update via email list<br /> #***Moving image section migrated from Google Drive draft to Wikipedia article<br /> #****A couple of other contributors made edits that were biased toward specific file formats<br /> #*****So, Linda Tadic helped edit it again to remove that bias<br /> #***Email preservation section on hold until contributors have time to work on it<br /> #Staffing survey<br /> #* Publish report team - a good draft has been written, should be finished by end of April and ready to share<br /> #** Not yet sure where to publish; definitely will be shared with NDSA members, but looking to share more broadly as well<br /> #** Surprise (per Andrea) - number of digital preservation functions people wanted to do in-house rather than outsourcing<br /> #** Not surprising - many activities are under-resourced, not enough staff to do everything<br /> #* Archive team<br /> #* Writing metadata for archiving in ICPSR; will link data and final report<br /> #Anything else?<br /> #* Nope<br /> #Next call: April 15th, 2013</div>

Emily-f-shaw