NDSA:IPRES 2015 Poster Proposal - Revision history

Dlfadm: 16 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:20:53Z

16 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:20, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Andrea goethals: /* Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes */

2015-06-11T18:41:19Z

Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, 11 June 2015
Line 87:		Line 87:
	** A discussion about video including FADGI activities on an application specification and guiding principles, institutional projects (NYU, Stanford, Harvard), and the AVPreserve perspective		** A discussion about video including FADGI activities on an application specification and guiding principles, institutional projects (NYU, Stanford, Harvard), and the AVPreserve perspective
	** The deep dive survey (identifying the stumbling blocks in preserving video)		** The deep dive survey (identifying the stumbling blocks in preserving video)
	* An approach for implementing the OAIS Reference Model and the derived Trustworthy Repository Auditing & Certification metrics (TRAC) in a distributed digital preservation (DDP) environment. This was a joint project by the Educopia Institute and the NDSA
	** More information is at http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=DDP_OAIS_Frameworks
	* Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools		* Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools

Line 98:		Line 96:
	* For the Levels of Preservation project we can say that members made presentations about it at IS&T Archiving 2013, the 2013 NE NDSA Regional Workshop, the 2013 SAA Annual Conference, and iPRES 2013.		* For the Levels of Preservation project we can say that members made presentations about it at IS&T Archiving 2013, the 2013 NE NDSA Regional Workshop, the 2013 SAA Annual Conference, and iPRES 2013.
	* For the Staffing Survey we can say that it was reused for a survey of UN members.		* For the Staffing Survey we can say that it was reused for a survey of UN members.
			* An approach for implementing the OAIS Reference Model and the derived Trustworthy Repository Auditing & Certification metrics (TRAC) in a distributed digital preservation (DDP) environment. This was a joint project by the Educopia Institute and the NDSA
			** More information is at http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=DDP_OAIS_Frameworks

	=== Here are more topics we wanted to look at in the future, for our future projects section ===		=== Here are more topics we wanted to look at in the future, for our future projects section ===

Andrea goethals: /* Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes */

2015-06-11T18:37:22Z

Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes

@@ Line 78: / Line 78: @@
 I went through all the call notes and found some things we can add. Some of these are projects or discussions we didn't mention yet in the abstract; others are more information to add to projects we did already mention in the abstract.
 * A survey of the standards, metadata schemas, and formats related to digital preservation
 ** We didn't produce any public deliverables from this - they are only listed on our private wiki in various places and in a Google doc.
@@ Line 89: / Line 90: @@
 ** More information is at http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=DDP_OAIS_Frameworks
 * Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools
 * Our members attend a lot of different conferences and we have shared highlights from many of them: Screening the Future Conference, Digital Directions, CurateCamp, Digital Preservation, IFLA, iPRES, LC Storage Meeting, Research Data Alliance, AMIA, ICA, DLF, IASA
-* Our members periodically share updates on projects they are working on outside of the NDSA. These have included the UDFR, the Academic Preservation Trust, data management guides, DPN, repository self-assessments, a Drupal-based TRAC tool and institutional projects.
+* Our members periodically share updates on projects they are working on outside of the NDSA. These have included the UDFR, the Academic Preservation Trust, data management guides, DPN, repository self-assessments, a Drupal-based TRAC tool and many different institutional projects.

Andrea goethals: /* Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes */

2015-06-11T16:05:35Z

Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 11 June 2015
Line 90:		Line 90:
	* Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools		* Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools
	* Our members attend a lot of different conferences and we have shared highlights from many of them: Screening the Future Conference, Digital Directions, CurateCamp, Digital Preservation, IFLA, iPRES, LC Storage Meeting, Research Data Alliance, AMIA, ICA, DLF, IASA		* Our members attend a lot of different conferences and we have shared highlights from many of them: Screening the Future Conference, Digital Directions, CurateCamp, Digital Preservation, IFLA, iPRES, LC Storage Meeting, Research Data Alliance, AMIA, ICA, DLF, IASA
			* Our members periodically share updates on projects they are working on outside of the NDSA. These have included the UDFR, the Academic Preservation Trust, data management guides, DPN, repository self-assessments, a Drupal-based TRAC tool and institutional projects.

Andrea goethals: /* Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes */

2015-06-11T15:59:28Z

Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 11 June 2015
Line 77:		Line 77:
	== Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes ==		== Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes ==
	I went through all the call notes and found some things we can add. Some of these are projects or discussions we didn't mention yet in the abstract; others are more information to add to projects we did already mention in the abstract.		I went through all the call notes and found some things we can add. Some of these are projects or discussions we didn't mention yet in the abstract; others are more information to add to projects we did already mention in the abstract.

			* A survey of the standards, metadata schemas, and formats related to digital preservation
			** We didn't produce any public deliverables from this - they are only listed on our private wiki in various places and in a Google doc.
			** Ultimately we ended up reshaping this project to work on the digital preservation article in Wikipedia but we put a lot of work into this and we could come back to this at some point to share it or continue to work on it
			* A discussion of the packaging of content and metadata, for example BagIt, METS, MXF
			** The notes for this are at http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=February_24,_2014_Standards_%26_Practices_Working_Group_Notes
			* We actually had 2 different video-related activities:
			** A discussion about video including FADGI activities on an application specification and guiding principles, institutional projects (NYU, Stanford, Harvard), and the AVPreserve perspective
			** The deep dive survey (identifying the stumbling blocks in preserving video)
			* An approach for implementing the OAIS Reference Model and the derived Trustworthy Repository Auditing & Certification metrics (TRAC) in a distributed digital preservation (DDP) environment. This was a joint project by the Educopia Institute and the NDSA
			** More information is at http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=DDP_OAIS_Frameworks
			* Similar to video, besides the email archiving interest group, we had demos of email archiving tools
			* Our members attend a lot of different conferences and we have shared highlights from many of them: Screening the Future Conference, Digital Directions, CurateCamp, Digital Preservation, IFLA, iPRES, LC Storage Meeting, Research Data Alliance, AMIA, ICA, DLF, IASA

Andrea goethals at 15:49, 11 June 2015

2015-06-11T15:49:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 11 June 2015
Line 74:		Line 74:
	*Action items:		*Action items:
	**Kate and Winston will work on abstract and send to this group (poster team) in 10 days – June 1		**Kate and Winston will work on abstract and send to this group (poster team) in 10 days – June 1

			== Andrea's Notes after Reviewing the Minutes ==
			I went through all the call notes and found some things we can add. Some of these are projects or discussions we didn't mention yet in the abstract; others are more information to add to projects we did already mention in the abstract.

Eengle: /* Brainstorming Notes from 5/18 Call */

2015-05-21T19:59:47Z

Brainstorming Notes from 5/18 Call

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 *Points to address in the abstract:
--	Who we are: Active practitioners in the DP space
+**Who we are: Active practitioners in the DP space
--	How our projects are generated: Issues and concerns that we come across in our daily work
+**How our projects are generated: Issues and concerns that we come across in our daily work
--	How we address our work: Group comes together, consensus on working on issues, that are helpful to the larger community, not just NDSA
+**How we address our work: Group comes together, consensus on working on issues, that are helpful to the larger community, not just NDSA
--	What’s coming up: Show opportunities for growth and future work
+**What’s coming up: Show opportunities for growth and future work
-Action items:
+*Is this grassroots effort focus in the DP or focused on NDSA S&P work?
-•	Kate and Winston will work on abstract and send to this group (poster team) in 10 days – June 1

Eengle at 19:58, 21 May 2015

2015-05-21T19:58:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:58, 21 May 2015
Line 39:		Line 39:

	The poster name “In the Thicket of It” (which Kate just made up after the call and is by no means the final name) could refer to both the botanical representation of the data in tree form but also our main message: S&P members are active practitioners – right in the thick of it, get it? – working on moving the work forward on real world issues. We would want to showcase that the needs of the group germinate in conversations, the results of which are resources and activities that benefit not only the working group members but also the community-at-large.		The poster name “In the Thicket of It” (which Kate just made up after the call and is by no means the final name) could refer to both the botanical representation of the data in tree form but also our main message: S&P members are active practitioners – right in the thick of it, get it? – working on moving the work forward on real world issues. We would want to showcase that the needs of the group germinate in conversations, the results of which are resources and activities that benefit not only the working group members but also the community-at-large.


			== Brainstorming Notes from 5/18 Call ==
			*“In the Thicket of It” – title

			*Points to address in the abstract:
			1- Who we are: Active practitioners in the DP space
			2- How our projects are generated: Issues and concerns that we come across in our daily work
			3- How we address our work: Group comes together, consensus on working on issues, that are helpful to the larger community, not just NDSA
			4- What’s coming up: Show opportunities for growth and future work
			Is this grassroots effort focus in the DP or focused on NDSA S&P work?
			Examples of possible design: Bristle-cone pine (soft tree), apple or fruit tree (ripe vs not yet ripe), tree branches (buds, buds growing). Represent what we have worked on vs what has been identified
			Information to display in the design:
			• Problem statement and brief statement of how we addressed it
			• Lengths of projects – 2010- present
			• Title, URL, date
			• More background information “in the soil” – last month we thought to include member institutions in the soil. Or members could be roots and soil could be info.
			• Branch could list the main issue of the topic (ex. A/V), and the fruit could the project, outcome or product (ex. Video survey).
			S&P Projects – what have we done? What have we identified that we have yet to work on?
			Information to include in the abstract:
			• Identify S&P projects – issues and outcomes
			• Develop a narrative
			Volunteers to help with the abstract??????
			• Kate Murray – first draft
			• Karl Jackson
			• Winston Atkins – first draft
			• Carol Kussmann

			Action items:
			• Kate and Winston will work on abstract and send to this group (poster team) in 10 days – June 1

Kate Murry: /* Poster Team */

2015-04-29T12:24:50Z

Poster Team

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 29 April 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== Poster Team ==		== Poster Team ==

			*Meg Phillips, NARA
			*Winston Atkins, Duke
			*Martin Halbert, UNT
	*Karl Jackson, US Marine Corps Band		*Karl Jackson, US Marine Corps Band
	*Carol Kussmann, UMN		*Carol Kussmann, UMN

Eengle at 18:39, 28 April 2015

2015-04-28T18:39:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 28 April 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== iPRES Info==		== iPRES Info==

	~~[[NDSA:~~iPres 2015, Nov. 2-6, Chapel Hill, NC \| http://ipres2015.org/]]		'''
			iPres 2015, Nov. 2-6, Chapel Hill, NC'''
			[[NDSA: http://ipres2015.org/]]