NDSA:February 25, 2013 Standards Working Group Notes - Revision history

Dlfadm: 4 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:19:57Z

4 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision	Revision as of 15:19, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Amy.Kirchhoff at 15:16, 27 February 2013

2013-02-27T15:16:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 27 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''1. New member introduction'''		'''1. New member introduction'''

	No new members on the call.		* No new members on the call.

	'''2. Contributions to the NDSA National Agenda report [1] (35 minutes)'''		'''2. Contributions to the NDSA National Agenda report [1] (35 minutes)'''
Line 26:		Line 26:
	''Digital Content Section''		''Digital Content Section''

	Q about Compound, complex document section ... scope is not specific. Maybe change "document" to something less format specific. Maybe "objects". All agree this is better.		* Q about Compound, complex document section ... scope is not specific. Maybe change "document" to something less format specific. Maybe "objects". All agree this is better.
			* We want to consider dynamic content that changes over time
	We want to consider dynamic content that changes over time		* Digital art & new media.
			* Connecting preserved publications to preserved data (connections between repositories)
	Digital art & new media.		* Accessibility of digital content
			* Discoverability of digital content
	Connecting preserved publications to preserved data (connections between repositories)		* Big data?
			* Computational consumption of archives
	Accessibility of digital content		* Annotations
			* What to do when you need to limit access due to restrictions of one reason or another (copyright, human studies, etc.)
	Discoverability of digital content		* Leveraging tools and practices in digital forensics community.
			* Tools available to package and annotate content.
	Big data?

	Computational consumption of archives

	Annotations

	What to do when you need to limit access due to restrictions of one reason or another (copyright, human studies, etc.)

	Leveraging tools and practices in digital forensics community.

	Tools available to package and annotate content.

	''Research Section''		''Research Section''

	Integration of large scale emulation into delivery.		* Integration of large scale emulation into delivery.
			* Testing of migration.
	Testing of migration.		* Integration of emulation and migration.

	Integration of emulation and migration.

	''Infrastructure Section''		''Infrastructure Section''

	Storage at scale		* Storage at scale
			* Tools to aid in risk assessment and archive management (preservation planning).
	Tools to aid in risk assessment and archive management (preservation planning).


	'''3. New projects (15 minutes)		'''3. New projects (15 minutes)
	b. Certifications'''		b. Certifications'''

	Nancy didn't make the call. New charter on the NDSA page. We might want to wait for Nancy.		* Nancy didn't make the call. New charter on the NDSA page. We might want to wait for Nancy.
			* Main idea is to review options for different archives and repositories.
	Main idea is to review options for different archives and repositories.		* For instance, in Europe, there is a framework for data ... data seal of approval, then self-assessment, and then full certification is self assessment and full audit. An org has to decide what makes the most sense for themselves. How do you understand your organization's investment in doing any of these activities and the gain you might get from doing any of them.

	For instance, in Europe, there is a framework for data ... data seal of approval, then self-assessment, and then full certification is self assessment and full audit. An org has to decide what makes the most sense for themselves. How do you understand your organization's investment in doing any of these activities and the gain you might get from doing any of them.


Line 78:		Line 61:
	a. PDF/A-3 (5 minutes)'''		a. PDF/A-3 (5 minutes)'''

	Pros/cons and use cases.		* Pros/cons and use cases.
			* Set up a GoogleDoc.
	Set up a GoogleDoc.		* Going to try and get pieces in by 3rd week in March in time for next meeting of the PDF/A-3 group the next week.
			* DPC is sponsoring a session on PDF/A-3 and Sheila will be there.
	Going to try and get pieces in by 3rd week in March in time for next meeting of the PDF/A-3 group the next week.		* Probably nothing for this bigger Standards group until April.

	DPC is sponsoring a session on PDF/A-3 and Sheila will be there.

	Probably nothing for this bigger Standards group until April.

	''' b. WikiProject (5 minutes)'''		''' b. WikiProject (5 minutes)'''

	Working on best practices and email.		* Working on best practices and email.
			* Section for long-term email preservation has been written off-line. Chris and Dina. Email archiving will be drafted for next week.
	Section for long-term email preservation has been written off-line. Chris and Dina. Email archiving will be drafted for next week.


	'''5. Next call, March 18th'''		'''5. Next call, March 18th'''

Amy.Kirchhoff at 15:14, 27 February 2013

2013-02-27T15:14:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:14, 27 February 2013
Line 9:		Line 9:
	''Organizational Section''		''Organizational Section''

	We have been asked to describe why the topic matters at this time, plus make recommendations about next steps.		* We have been asked to describe why the topic matters at this time, plus make recommendations about next steps.
			* Can/should we put in something about staffing survey from last year? Perhaps mention of FTEs in one of the bullets. The survey also talked about characteristics of people being looking for.
	Can/should we put in something about staffing survey from last year? Perhaps mention of FTEs in one of the bullets. The survey also talked about characteristics of people being looking for.		* Would it be useful to do an environmental scan/inventory of positions in digital preservation that people could use as models?
			* It was mentioned that many first need to simplp get management to understand that digital preservation needs to happen.
	Would it be useful to do an environmental scan/inventory of positions in digital preservation that people could use as models?		* Audit and certification project ... should we integrate that into this document?
			* Any regional or local efforts we should focus on? Partnerships?
	It was mentioned that many first need to simplp get management to understand that digital preservation needs to happen.		* What about international efforts?
			* Estonia -- Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation document ... maybe it can be helpful in helping us decide on what to focus?
	Audit and certification project ... should we integrate that into this document?		* How does digital preservation fit into bigger things, like data management?
			* This is about scoping what we are responsible for at different scales.
	Any regional or local efforts we should focus on? Partnerships?		* Role of disciplinary repositories and what LC is going to take responsibility for and what others will do.
			* Network of repositories.
	What about international efforts?		* White House mandate for open access.
			* Compliance coming from different places ... funded research, etc.
	Estonia -- Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation document ... maybe it can be helpful in helping us decide on what to focus?

	How does digital preservation fit into bigger things, like data management?

	This is about scoping what we are responsible for at different scales.

	Role of disciplinary repositories and what LC is going to take responsibility for and what others will do.

	Network of repositories.

	White House mandate for open access.

	Compliance coming from different places ... funded research, etc.

	''Digital Content Section''		''Digital Content Section''

Amy.Kirchhoff at 15:13, 27 February 2013

2013-02-27T15:13:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 27 February 2013
Line 41:		Line 41:
	Q about Compound, complex document section ... scope is not specific. Maybe change "document" to something less format specific. Maybe "objects". All agree this is better.		Q about Compound, complex document section ... scope is not specific. Maybe change "document" to something less format specific. Maybe "objects". All agree this is better.

	~~Sheila:~~ dynamic content that changes over time		We want to consider dynamic content that changes over time

	Digital art & new ~~mediac~~		Digital art & new media.

	Connecting preserved publications to preserved data (connections between repositories)		Connecting preserved publications to preserved data (connections between repositories)
Line 53:		Line 53:
	Big data?		Big data?

	~~computational~~ consumption of archives		Computational consumption of archives

	Annotations		Annotations
Line 63:		Line 63:
	Tools available to package and annotate content.		Tools available to package and annotate content.

			''Research Section''

	~~Research~~		Integration of large scale emulation into delivery.

	~~Sheila: integration~~ of large scale emulation into delivery.

	Testing of migration.		Testing of migration.
Line 72:		Line 71:
	Integration of emulation and migration.		Integration of emulation and migration.

	Infrastructure		''Infrastructure Section''

	Storage at scale		Storage at scale
Line 79:		Line 78:


	3. New projects (15 minutes)		'''3. New projects (15 minutes)
	b. Certifications		b. Certifications'''

	Nancy didn't make the call. New charter on the NDSA page. We might want to wait for Nancy.		Nancy didn't make the call. New charter on the NDSA page. We might want to wait for Nancy.

	Main idea is to review options for different archives and ~~repositoires~~.		Main idea is to review options for different archives and repositories.

	For instance, in Europe, there is a framework for data ... data seal of approval, then self-assessment, and then full certification is self assessment and full audit. An org has to decide what makes the most sense for themselves. How do you understand your ~~organizations~~ investment in doing any of these activities and the gain you might get from doing any of them.		For instance, in Europe, there is a framework for data ... data seal of approval, then self-assessment, and then full certification is self assessment and full audit. An org has to decide what makes the most sense for themselves. How do you understand your organization's investment in doing any of these activities and the gain you might get from doing any of them.


	4. Update on projects		'''4. Update on projects
	a. PDF/A-3 (5 minutes)		a. PDF/A-3 (5 minutes)'''

	Pros/cons and use cases.		Pros/cons and use cases.
Line 96:		Line 95:
	Set up a GoogleDoc.		Set up a GoogleDoc.

	Going to try and get pieces in by 3rd week in March in time for next meeting the next week.		Going to try and get pieces in by 3rd week in March in time for next meeting of the PDF/A-3 group the next week.

	DPC is sponsoring a session on PDF/A-3 and Sheila will be there.		DPC is sponsoring a session on PDF/A-3 and Sheila will be there.

	Probably nothing for this group until April.		Probably nothing for this bigger Standards group until April.

	b. WikiProject (5 minutes)		''' b. WikiProject (5 minutes)'''

	Working on best practices and email.		Working on best practices and email.
Line 109:		Line 108:


	5. Next call, March 18th		'''5. Next call, March 18th'''

Amy.Kirchhoff: Created page with ''''1. New member introduction''' No new members on the call. '''2. Contributions to the NDSA National Agenda report [1] (35 minutes)''' ''' We are going to try working toge…'

2013-02-27T15:09:31Z

Created page with ''''1. New member introduction''' No new members on the call. '''2. Contributions to the NDSA National Agenda report [1] (35 minutes)''' ''' We are going to try working toge…'

New page

'''1. New member introduction'''

No new members on the call.

'''2. Contributions to the NDSA National Agenda report [1] (35 minutes)'''
''' We are going to try working together on a document in real-time. Please check that you're able to edit the doc at the following link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SF3q1OpKaHL5Ylbzwd2T1O83TU8igrtvqOitB3ftqjc/edit'''

''Organizational Section''

We have been asked to describe why the topic matters at this time, plus make recommendations about next steps.

Can/should we put in something about staffing survey from last year? Perhaps mention of FTEs in one of the bullets. The survey also talked about characteristics of people being looking for.

Would it be useful to do an environmental scan/inventory of positions in digital preservation that people could use as models?

It was mentioned that many first need to simplp get management to understand that digital preservation needs to happen.

Audit and certification project ... should we integrate that into this document?

Any regional or local efforts we should focus on? Partnerships?

What about international efforts?

Estonia -- Aligning National Approaches to Digital Preservation document ... maybe it can be helpful in helping us decide on what to focus?

How does digital preservation fit into bigger things, like data management?

This is about scoping what we are responsible for at different scales.

Role of disciplinary repositories and what LC is going to take responsibility for and what others will do.

Network of repositories.

White House mandate for open access.

Compliance coming from different places ... funded research, etc.

''Digital Content Section''

Q about Compound, complex document section ... scope is not specific. Maybe change "document" to something less format specific. Maybe "objects". All agree this is better.

Sheila: dynamic content that changes over time

Digital art & new mediac

Connecting preserved publications to preserved data (connections between repositories)

Accessibility of digital content

Discoverability of digital content

Big data?

computational consumption of archives

Annotations

What to do when you need to limit access due to restrictions of one reason or another (copyright, human studies, etc.)

Leveraging tools and practices in digital forensics community.

Tools available to package and annotate content.

Research

Sheila: integration of large scale emulation into delivery.

Testing of migration.

Integration of emulation and migration.

Infrastructure

Storage at scale

Tools to aid in risk assessment and archive management (preservation planning).

3. New projects (15 minutes)
b. Certifications

Nancy didn't make the call. New charter on the NDSA page. We might want to wait for Nancy.

Main idea is to review options for different archives and repositoires.

For instance, in Europe, there is a framework for data ... data seal of approval, then self-assessment, and then full certification is self assessment and full audit. An org has to decide what makes the most sense for themselves. How do you understand your organizations investment in doing any of these activities and the gain you might get from doing any of them.

4. Update on projects
a. PDF/A-3 (5 minutes)

Pros/cons and use cases.

Set up a GoogleDoc.

Going to try and get pieces in by 3rd week in March in time for next meeting the next week.

DPC is sponsoring a session on PDF/A-3 and Sheila will be there.

Probably nothing for this group until April.

b. WikiProject (5 minutes)

Working on best practices and email.

Section for long-term email preservation has been written off-line. Chris and Dina. Email archiving will be drafted for next week.

5. Next call, March 18th