NDSA:Content Registry Fields - Revision history

Dlfadm: 8 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:18:31Z

8 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Daniel.cornwall: Changed order of fields

2011-11-21T22:19:22Z

Changed order of fields

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 21 November 2011
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Collection Information		Collection Information

	*Primary Subject Matter
	*Name of Specific Collection		*Name of Specific Collection
	*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):		*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):
Line 19:		Line 18:
	*Collection Location (Optional) - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to.)		*Collection Location (Optional) - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to.)
	*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials, mixed)		*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials, mixed)
			*Primary Subject Matter
	*Description		*Description
	*Level of Digital Preservation (Level 1, II, III)		*Level of Digital Preservation (Level 1, II, III)

Daniel.cornwall at 21:08, 21 November 2011

2011-11-21T21:08:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 21 November 2011
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*Description		*Description
	*Level of Digital Preservation (Level 1, II, III)		*Level of Digital Preservation (Level 1, II, III)
	**[[~~NDSA~~:NDSADigitalPreservationLevelsNarrative.pdf Narrative Document defining preservation levels]]		**[[File:NDSADigitalPreservationLevelsNarrative.pdf]] - Narrative Document defining preservation levels.
	**[[~~NDSA~~:NDSADigitalPreservationChart_v1 Chart of preservation levels with criteria]]		**[[File: NDSADigitalPreservationChart_v1.pdf]] - Chart of preservation levels with criteria.
	*Other Notes		*Other Notes

Daniel.cornwall: Revised page based on community content and final meeting on 11/21/2011.

2011-11-21T21:01:06Z

Revised page based on community content and final meeting on 11/21/2011.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 21 November 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance~~, the Content Registry ~~Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress~~. ~~As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:~~		In November 2011, the Content Working Group approved the following Digital Preservation Registry Fields.

	*Subject ~~(Controlled vocabulary to be determined)~~		Unless otherwise noted, all fields are required. It is up to the individual institution member to define what a collection is.


			Collection Information

			*Primary Subject Matter
	*Name of Specific Collection		*Name of Specific Collection
	*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):		*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):
Line 8:		Line 13:
	**Onsite - Must come to physical location for access		**Onsite - Must come to physical location for access
	**Restricted - No current access		**Restricted - No current access
			**Mixed - Some materials are available online, others are not.
	*URL (If Online)		*URL (If Online)
	*Collection Start Date - Publication date of earliest item in the collection		*Collection Start Date (Optional) - Publication date of earliest item in the collection
	*Collection End Date - Publication date of latest item in the collection		*Collection End Date (Optional)- Publication date of latest item in the collection
	*Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)		*Collection Location (Optional) - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to.)
	*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials)		*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials, mixed)
	*Description		*Description
	*~~Notes~~ (~~For noting if access to collection is mixed; partly open and partly not~~)		*Level of Digital Preservation (Level 1, II, III)
			**[[NDSA:NDSADigitalPreservationLevelsNarrative.pdf Narrative Document defining preservation levels]]
			**[[NDSA:NDSADigitalPreservationChart_v1 Chart of preservation levels with criteria]]
			*Other Notes

	Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution

	*DP in Content Creation – y/n
	*DP in Content integrity – y/n
	*DP in Content maintenance – y/n

	Institution Information		Institution Information

	*Institution Name		*Institution Name
			*Institution State
			*Institution City
			*Institution Zip Code
	*Collection Contact (e-mail and phone)		*Collection Contact (e-mail and phone)

	~~Currently we envision partner institutions filling out an Excel spreadsheet with the information above and sending it to a registry maintainer yet to be determined.~~


	Please comment on this page or send e-mail to daniel.cornwall@alaska.gov. In addition to feedback on the fields (add, subtract or delete), we'd like comment on how we can make this as easy as possible for the partner institutions. We'll take feedback until July 22nd, then send out a an alliancewide survey on July 25th or July 26th.

Daniel.cornwall at 18:19, 21 November 2011

2011-11-21T18:19:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:19, 21 November 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):		*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):
	**Online		**Online
			**Research Use - Need to register or apply to host institution.
	**Onsite - Must come to physical location for access		**Onsite - Must come to physical location for access
	**Restricted - No current access		**Restricted - No current access

Daniel.cornwall: Added explanatory text.

2011-08-09T00:45:58Z

Added explanatory text.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 8 August 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance, the Content Registry Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress. As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:		After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance, the Content Registry Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress. As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:

	*Subject		*Subject (Controlled vocabulary to be determined)
	*Name of Specific Collection		*Name of Specific Collection
	*URL		*Collection Availability (reflecting one of the following conditions):
	*Collection Availability (~~i.e. Public on web, public within building, no~~ access)		**Online
	*Collection Start Date		**Onsite - Must come to physical location for access
	*Collection End Date		**Restricted - No current access
			*URL (If Online)
			*Collection Start Date - Publication date of earliest item in the collection
			*Collection End Date - Publication date of latest item in the collection
	*Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)		*Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)
	*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials)		*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials)
	*Description		*Description
			*Notes (For noting if access to collection is mixed; partly open and partly not)

	Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution		Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution

Daniel.cornwall at 16:49, 6 July 2011

2011-07-06T16:49:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:49, 6 July 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*DP in Content integrity – y/n		*DP in Content integrity – y/n
	*DP in Content maintenance – y/n		*DP in Content maintenance – y/n

			Institution Information

	*Institution Name		*Institution Name

Daniel.cornwall at 16:48, 6 July 2011

2011-07-06T16:48:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 6 July 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance, the Content Registry Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress. As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:		After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance, the Content Registry Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress. As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:

	Subject		*Subject
	Name of Specific Collection		*Name of Specific Collection
	URL		*URL
	Collection Availability (i.e. Public on web, public within building, no access)		*Collection Availability (i.e. Public on web, public within building, no access)
	Collection Start Date		*Collection Start Date
	Collection End Date		*Collection End Date
	Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)		*Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)
	Content Type		*Content Type (born digital, digitized from tangible materials)
	Description		*Description

	Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution		Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution

	DP in Content Creation – y/n		*DP in Content Creation – y/n
	DP in Content integrity – y/n		*DP in Content integrity – y/n
	DP in Content maintenance – y/n		*DP in Content maintenance – y/n

	Institution Name		*Institution Name
	Collection Contact (e-mail and phone)		*Collection Contact (e-mail and phone)

	Currently we envision partner institutions filling out an Excel spreadsheet with the information above and sending it to a registry maintainer yet to be determined.		Currently we envision partner institutions filling out an Excel spreadsheet with the information above and sending it to a registry maintainer yet to be determined.

Daniel.cornwall: Added fields for proposed content registry.

2011-07-06T16:47:39Z

Added fields for proposed content registry.

New page

After reviewing our survey to the NDSA Alliance, the Content Registry Action Team decided to try an build a Registry based on the Recollection tool from the Library of Congress. As of July 5, 2011, we were considering requiring the following fields:

Subject
Name of Specific Collection
URL
Collection Availability (i.e. Public on web, public within building, no access)
Collection Start Date
Collection End Date
Collection Location (Optional - What geographic locations does this collection pertain to?)
Content Type
Description

Digital Preservation Fields (Based on http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alcts/resources/preserv/defdigpres0408.cfm), a "Y" in field indicates that all aspects of this Digital Preservation area have been met. This would be self reported by the partner institution

DP in Content Creation – y/n
DP in Content integrity – y/n
DP in Content maintenance – y/n

Institution Name
Collection Contact (e-mail and phone)

Currently we envision partner institutions filling out an Excel spreadsheet with the information above and sending it to a registry maintainer yet to be determined.

Please comment on this page or send e-mail to daniel.cornwall@alaska.gov. In addition to feedback on the fields (add, subtract or delete), we'd like comment on how we can make this as easy as possible for the partner institutions. We'll take feedback until July 22nd, then send out a an alliancewide survey on July 25th or July 26th.