NDSA:Content Case Studies - Revision history

Nowviskie: adding logo

2016-11-29T21:58:00Z

adding logo

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 29 November 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			[[File:NDSA Logo.png\|thumb]]
	'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>		'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>

Dlfadm: 9 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

2016-02-11T19:19:36Z

9 revisions imported: Migrate NDSA content from Library of Congress

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 11 February 2016
(No difference)

Abgr at 14:44, 11 February 2013

2013-02-11T14:44:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 11 February 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*Describe potential obstacles or risk factors. What barriers for users/creators/preservationists might be faced and what options are there for overcoming them?		*Describe potential obstacles or risk factors. What barriers for users/creators/preservationists might be faced and what options are there for overcoming them?
	*Develop actionable next steps. What can we do next, as a community or as individual institutions to ensure that important content is preserved?		*Develop actionable next steps. What can we do next, as a community or as individual institutions to ensure that important content is preserved?
	*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?

	'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>		'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>

Nicho147 at 18:27, 4 October 2012

2012-10-04T18:27:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 4 October 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:
	Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).		Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).

	Case studies will ~~define~~:		Case studies will:

	*Establish the value of the content and provide the rationale for selecting it for preservation. What value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance?		*Establish the value of the content and provide the rationale for selecting it for preservation. What value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance?

Abgr at 14:00, 3 October 2012

2012-10-03T14:00:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:00, 3 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>		'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>

	Content Case Studies		Content Case Studies

	'''One Sentence Description:'''<br>		'''One Sentence Description:'''<br>

	The Content Teams of the Content Working Group will develop case studies around a variety of types of content to share compelling stories that demonstrate the value of digital preservation in our communities.		The Content Teams of the Content Working Group will develop case studies around a variety of types of content to share compelling stories that demonstrate the value of digital preservation in our communities.

	'''Statement of the Problem and Goals for Addressing the Problem:'''<br>		'''Statement of the Problem and Goals for Addressing the Problem:'''<br>
	~~A brief paragraph summarizing the issues that the planned activity will address and how that work will help~~

	Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).		Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).
Line 21:		Line 22:

	'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>		'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>

	*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most valuable, so that material of historic or research importance is not lost		*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most valuable, so that material of historic or research importance is not lost
	*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most at risk, so that material in danger of disappearing for any reason is not lost		*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most at risk, so that material in danger of disappearing for any reason is not lost
Line 27:		Line 29:

	'''Required Resources:'''<br>		'''Required Resources:'''<br>

	* Time of working group members		* Time of working group members

	'''Roadmap:'''<br>		'''Roadmap:'''<br>

	Content Teams will meet separately to develop case studies, then share more broadly for feedback from other NDSA members in Content Working Group and NDSA-All. Approaches taken will be:		Content Teams will meet separately to develop case studies, then share more broadly for feedback from other NDSA members in Content Working Group and NDSA-All. Approaches taken will be:
	# Hold conference calls		# Hold conference calls
Line 38:		Line 42:

	'''Dissemination of Knowledge:''' <br>		'''Dissemination of Knowledge:''' <br>

	* Publish case studies on digitalpreservation.gov and/or other NDSA member websites		* Publish case studies on digitalpreservation.gov and/or other NDSA member websites
	* Write a blog post		* Write a blog post
Line 44:		Line 49:

	'''Signifiers of Success and Outcomes:'''<br>		'''Signifiers of Success and Outcomes:'''<br>

	Case studies from each Content Team will be developed and shared broadly with all stakeholders, from content producers to cultural heritage organizations. Additional activities for the Content Working Group will emerge from the case studies and dialog about them will bring more awareness to the issues surrounding the featured content types.		Case studies from each Content Team will be developed and shared broadly with all stakeholders, from content producers to cultural heritage organizations. Additional activities for the Content Working Group will emerge from the case studies and dialog about them will bring more awareness to the issues surrounding the featured content types.

Abgr at 13:59, 3 October 2012

2012-10-03T13:59:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 3 October 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:
	*Case studies provide persuasive arguments for devoting scarce institutional resources to digital preservation activities		*Case studies provide persuasive arguments for devoting scarce institutional resources to digital preservation activities
	*Case studies provide justification and background information for grant proposals and other fund raising efforts		*Case studies provide justification and background information for grant proposals and other fund raising efforts


	'''Required Resources:'''<br>		'''Required Resources:'''<br>
	* Time of working group members		* Time of working group members


	'''Roadmap:'''<br>		'''Roadmap:'''<br>

Abgr at 13:59, 3 October 2012

2012-10-03T13:59:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 3 October 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~'''DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT'''~~

	'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>		'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>
	Content Case Studies		Content Case Studies
Line 23:		Line 21:

	'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>		'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>
	*		*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most valuable, so that material of historic or research importance is not lost
			*Case studies focus digital preservation efforts on the content that is most at risk, so that material in danger of disappearing for any reason is not lost
			*Case studies provide persuasive arguments for devoting scarce institutional resources to digital preservation activities
			*Case studies provide justification and background information for grant proposals and other fund raising efforts


	'''Required Resources:'''<br>		'''Required Resources:'''<br>

Abgr at 19:27, 20 September 2012

2012-09-20T19:27:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:27, 20 September 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Case studies will define:		Case studies will define:

	*Establish ~~Value/Rationale~~ for ~~collecting – what~~ value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of ~~disappearance—small audience, gnarly formats, proprietary software, tight copyright restrictions, etc.~~?		*Establish the value of the content and provide the rationale for selecting it for preservation. What value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance?
	*Document recognized opportunities ~~- are~~ there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that preservation ~~could be worked into~~?		*Document recognized opportunities for preserving this content. Are there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that present opportunities for preservation?
	*~~Description of Target Audiences: who~~ would find value in this content~~,. is~~ the ~~short-term audience different from the long-term audience? How~~?		*Describe target audiences/stakeholders. Who would find value in this content and how might they be engaged in the process of preservation?
	*Outline a plan for educating ~~Stakeholders - how~~ might NDSA or an organization ~~go about raising~~ awareness~~, and to whom? (~~content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, donors)		*Outline a plan for educating stakeholders. How might NDSA or another organization raise the awareness of stakeholders including content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, or donors?
	* ~~What are the~~ obstacles or risk factors~~? - describe~~ barriers for users/creators/preservationists – what ~~challenges have you/might you face~~?		*Describe potential obstacles or risk factors. What barriers for users/creators/preservationists might be faced and what options are there for overcoming them?
			*Develop actionable next steps. What can we do next, as a community or as individual institutions to ensure that important content is preserved?
	*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?		*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?


	'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>		'''Strategic Value of Activity:'''<br>

Abgr at 18:56, 31 August 2012

2012-08-31T18:56:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 31 August 2012
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Case studies will define:		Case studies will define:

	*Establish Value/Rationale for collecting – what value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance—small audience, gnarly formats, proprietary software, tight copyright restrictions, etc.?		*Establish Value/Rationale for collecting – what value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance—small audience, gnarly formats, proprietary software, tight copyright restrictions, etc.?
	*Document recognized opportunities - are there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that preservation could be worked into?		*Document recognized opportunities - are there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that preservation could be worked into?
	*Description of Target Audiences: who would find value in this content,. is the short-term audience different from the long-term audience? How?		*Description of Target Audiences: who would find value in this content,. is the short-term audience different from the long-term audience? How?
	*Outline a plan for educating Stakeholders - how might NDSA or an organization go about raising awareness, and to whom? (content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, donors)		*Outline a plan for educating Stakeholders - how might NDSA or an organization go about raising awareness, and to whom? (content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, donors)
	* What are the obstacles or risk factors? - describe barriers for users/creators/preservationists – what challenges have you/might you face?		* What are the obstacles or risk factors? - describe barriers for users/creators/preservationists – what challenges have you/might you face?
	*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?		*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?

Abgr at 18:55, 31 August 2012

2012-08-31T18:55:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, 31 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT'''

	'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>		'''Title of Activity or Project'''<br>
	Content Case Studies		Content Case Studies
Line 8:		Line 10:
	A brief paragraph summarizing the issues that the planned activity will address and how that work will help		A brief paragraph summarizing the issues that the planned activity will address and how that work will help

	1. Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).		Content teams decide categories of content that are important in their groups at whatever granularity works best for the exercise (ie. Blogs of NGOs, legal blogs, citizen science, local newspaper websites, digital art, local government information).

	Case studies ~~ideally would~~ define:		Case studies will define:

	Establish Value/Rationale for collecting – what value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance—small audience, gnarly formats, proprietary software, tight copyright restrictions, etc.?		*Establish Value/Rationale for collecting – what value does the content have? Is anyone collecting it? What factors affect its risk of disappearance—small audience, gnarly formats, proprietary software, tight copyright restrictions, etc.?
	Document recognized opportunities - are there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that preservation could be worked into?		*Document recognized opportunities - are there workflows in the creation or distribution of content that preservation could be worked into?
	Description of Target Audiences: who would find value in this content,. is the short-term audience different from the long-term audience? How?		*Description of Target Audiences: who would find value in this content,. is the short-term audience different from the long-term audience? How?
	Outline a plan for educating Stakeholders - how might NDSA or an organization go about raising awareness, and to whom? (content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, donors)		*Outline a plan for educating Stakeholders - how might NDSA or an organization go about raising awareness, and to whom? (content creators, publishers, educators, libraries, researchers, donors)
	What are the obstacles or risk factors? - describe barriers for users/creators/preservationists – what challenges have you/might you face?		* What are the obstacles or risk factors? - describe barriers for users/creators/preservationists – what challenges have you/might you face?
	Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?		*Actionable items – what can we do next, as a community (or individual institution)?