Adw: Fixed topic

2019-10-13T22:21:39Z

Fixed topic

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 13 October 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Meeting minutes: June 3, 2019		Meeting minutes: June 3, 2019

	'''''~~Wiki Resources and Signal Boosting~~'''''		'''''The Maintainers'''''

	Facilitator: Jess Farrell		Facilitator: Jess Farrell

Adw: Notes from the Labor WG call 2019-06-03

2019-10-13T22:20:54Z

Notes from the Labor WG call 2019-06-03

New page

'''DLF WG on Labor in Digital Libraries, Archives and Museums: Valuing Labor Subgroup'''

Meeting minutes: June 3, 2019

'''''Wiki Resources and Signal Boosting'''''

Facilitator: Jess Farrell

Note-taker: Amy Wickner

[https://wiki.diglib.org/Labor/Valuing-Labor/2019-Calls Complete 2019 schedule]

== Overview of the Maintainers ==
Started ~5 years ago - Lee & Andy Russell thinking through ideas / but also sort of as a joke re: Walter Isaacson Innovators book

Happy hour → 2 conferences @ Stevens Inst 2016 & 2017 → word of mouth → global interdisciplinary research community

Started out pretty academic (historians, historians of tech, archivists, artists)

2017 conference included practitioner-focused day (community development groups, NGOs, CEOs of companies, activist groups)

Moving into more of a practitioner focus
* Recentering cultural attention away from new things to the work maintainers do to keep society going
* Quickly moves to labor policy because maintainers are so underpaid

Maintainers in the workforce

Project just getting off the ground - maintainers as prompt to rethink labor policy
* United Way - Asset Limited Income-Constrained Employed - 40% of Americans struggle to pay monthly rent & other costs
* Divided workforce in to innovator/maintainer/[care?] roles
* BLS occupation statistics → divide into innovative/inventor / maintainer roles → 95% of Ohio (first state looked at) are maintainers; holds across all states

[http://themaintainers.org/connect Connect with Maintainers]

== Overview of Information Maintainers ==
Why it’s a compelling framework for information professionals
* Got involved starting with first conference, immediately connected with conversations happening there
* Interdisciplinary nature of the conference, always some practitioners, conversations between history/theory people & people doing maintenance in their real lives
** From the chat: librarians and archivists talk about the need for interdisciplinarity all the time, not even from a power-building perspective, but from an advocacy perspective, and to just build relationships...and we never actually practice that in our in-person meeting spaces (conferences etc)
** From the chat: Perhaps one reason is that by being truly interdisciplinary others can’t place you in the square peg world, thus we try to ‘fit’ in, when we are mutli-faceted
* Hoping to connect people across sectors that were traditionally isolated, information professionals thinking more broadly about who we might build labor power with - janitors, not curators
* Connects with thought happening in archives (and sort of libraries) world re: care ethics

Started at 2nd Maintainers conversation (2017)

How to operationalize ideas - LAM people already doing maintenance work but not talking about it

Librarians, archivists, digital preservation people

White paper
* [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3236409 Information Maintenance as a Practice of Care]
* How we think this maintenance framework applies to the world of information maintainers
* Releasing to the broader world pretty soon

[http://themaintainers.org/miii Maintainers III] coming up in October, Washington, DC
* Bigger, focused on practitioners, 4 tracks
* Looking at proposals for Information track right now

== Discussion (Q&A) ==
How did this group come together? (DLF Labor WG, all info is on [https://wiki.diglib.org/Labor wiki])
* [long-ass overview by Amy]

To what extent have Maintainers used the Valuing Labor research agenda? How do they connect?
* Yes - looked at both research agenda & guidelines for grant-funded positions
* Forthcoming white paper has sidebars / exemplars of where the work we’re talking about is already going on, including Labor WG
* In the bigger Maintainers project there’s quite a bit of overlap (not just info maintainers)
* Recently funded grant to look at maintenance etc. are valued within engineering, where it’s often defined as “not engineering”; encouragement to look at city planning & architecture → these dynamics happen in many different fields
** From the chat: One of the consequences of devaluaing maintainers is that people perceived as maintainers who are actually more like innovators(?) also get devalued. So I mean all the digital archivists who make literally $100k less than someone in the IT/corporate tech world who could map their job competencies almost 1-1
* Interested in institutional self-assessment & measurement in general - how do you measure well-being of maintainers in general?
* Shared focus on research as one way in which these things happen
* Maintainers community framework
** Sloan grant to build up Maintainers org
** Looking across different professions & sectors for common structures & phenomena
** Aggregate lessons learned, metrics

Early impressions on where to talk about metrics, assessment, etc.?
* Shock of the Old
* We don’t have good measures of maintenance as a portion of economic activity → makes it hard to talk about in anything other than subjective terms
* Things: How do we get better at maintenance e.g. digital preservation, maintaining the stuff around us?
* People (especially uncomfortable re: metrics): Human resources, conflict resolution, ombudspeople, not just how satisfied workers are but also whether maintenance workers feel recognized & respected; whether they feel they have the resources they need
** e.g. in libraries, new initiatives introduced → people responsible for them without recognition or resources and with stress

Follow-up: How does gender play into that?
* Digital archives request for resources
** Women leaving digital archives & citing inequitable allocation of resources
** “Digital” brings in a lot of gendered attitudes re: technology x work
* Thinking more broadly, women do far more maintenance in the world
* Connect to feminist literatures on invisible / feminized work
* OSS communities
* Women tasked with maintenance roles more often in organizations

What actions do you envision being taken by the research you're building
* Long-term action: valuing labor
** Core hypothesis about Info Maintainers is we need to think about who we align ourselves with to build labor power differently than we have in the past
** As long as we continue to look inward, to divisive credentialing to build power as a workforce we’re not going to be effective
** Maintainers gives us a framework to rethink that: who out there is doing work that’s similar to us, understands these experiences of not being seen?
* Short-term
** Start building maintenance-centered conversations at existing information professional gatherings, SAA, other conferences
** Virtual roundtables for the white paper
** Curriculum development (Amelia Acker)
* Trying to be realistic about institutional self-assessment & managers → building tools to empower workers to begin conversations at their place of work
* We don’t have to reinvent from scratch - use existing tools

What role do labor unions play in building power for maintainers? And how do we confront the fact that very few infomaintainers are unionized?
* How to build power without a union?
* Trying to involve unions in MIII e.g. transport unions
* Don’t really see these things happening without actual labor politics
* Conversation about labor x information workers has been happening forever
* Emphasis that Maintainers is not an innovation! Building on past work, bringing together people who are already doing this work.

What can people in Labor WG do to support / get involved in Maintainers?
* White paper - get it out there, participate in roundtables
** Possibly including one on labor
* Not looking for a cookie! Looking for substantive engagement, including “you were wrong” (if necessary)
* Always looking for ideas, feel free to pitch ideas, collaborations
* Info Maintainers is looking to grow, will offer ways to join when the paper comes out

== Announcements ==
Job alert: Research Librarian @ AFSCME

Museum workers’ salaries: http://www.artnews.com/2019/05/31/google-spreadsheet-museum-workers-disclose-salaries/

Next meeting: Monday, July 1, 3pm Eastern / 12pm Pacific - facilitator needed

Labor/Valuing-Labor/2019-06-03 - Revision history

Adw: Fixed topic

Adw: Notes from the Labor WG call 2019-06-03