Assessment:Benefits - Revision history

Thompsonsa82 at 18:40, 17 January 2018

2018-01-17T18:40:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:40, 17 January 2018
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Past Projects ==		== Past Projects ==

	Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].		''' Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"]. '''

	=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===		=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===

Thompsonsa82 at 18:36, 17 January 2018

2018-01-17T18:36:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 17 January 2018
Line 11:		Line 11:

	== Past Projects ==		== Past Projects ==

			Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].

	=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===		=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===

	Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].

	Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:		Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:

Thompsonsa82 at 18:35, 17 January 2018

2018-01-17T18:35:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 17 January 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment. As part of this work, Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].		The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment.

	== Current Projects ==		== Current Projects ==

	The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.		The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.

			== Get Involved ==

			If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our
			[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)

	== Past Projects ==		== Past Projects ==

	=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===		=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===

			Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].

	Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:		Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:
Line 20:		Line 27:
	* Address special challenges raised by aggregation		* Address special challenges raised by aggregation

	We ~~are sharing~~ resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].		We shared resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].

	~~We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!~~

	For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She is incorporating suggestions and recommendations.

	Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].

			We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]].

	~~If you are interested~~ in ~~helping us develop~~ best practices and ~~guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our~~		For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She incorporated suggestions and recommendations.
	[https://~~groups~~.google.com/~~forum~~/~~#!forum~~/~~digital~~-~~library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group~~] and ~~speak up! :-)~~

	----		----

	[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]		[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]

Thompsonsa82: /* Current Projects */

2018-01-17T18:30:48Z

Current Projects

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:30, 17 January 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Current Projects ==		== Current Projects ==

	The Benefits Working Group is not currently active~~. Those interested in participating in this group should contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]~~.		The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.

	== Past Projects ==		== Past Projects ==

Thompsonsa82 at 14:41, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T14:41:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 17 October 2016
Line 19:		Line 19:
	* Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)		* Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)
	* Address special challenges raised by aggregation		* Address special challenges raised by aggregation


	We are sharing resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].		We are sharing resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].

Thompsonsa82 at 14:41, 17 October 2016

2016-10-17T14:41:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 17 October 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment. As part of this work, Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].

	== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ==		== Current Projects ==

			The Benefits Working Group is not currently active. Those interested in participating in this group should contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson].

			== Past Projects ==

			=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===

	Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:		Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:

Thompsonsa82 at 22:48, 22 October 2015

2015-10-22T22:48:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 22 October 2015
Line 25:		Line 25:
	If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our		If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our
	[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)		[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)

			----

			[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]

Jody at 12:55, 24 April 2015

2015-04-24T12:55:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:55, 24 April 2015
Line 19:		Line 19:

	For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She is incorporating suggestions and recommendations.		For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She is incorporating suggestions and recommendations.

			Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 "Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories"].


	If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our		If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our
	[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)		[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)

Jody at 20:58, 8 April 2015

2015-04-08T20:58:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 8 April 2015
Line 16:		Line 16:
	We are sharing resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].		We are sharing resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].

	We ~~have~~ formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!		We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!

			For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Now Closed]. She is incorporating suggestions and recommendations.
	~~Until '''April 3rd'''~~, Elizabeth Kelly ~~is requesting~~ feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# ~~Please comment!~~]


	If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our		If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our
	[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)		[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)

Jody at 16:13, 9 March 2015

2015-03-09T16:13:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 9 March 2015
Line 17:		Line 17:

	We have formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!		We have formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!


			Until '''April 3rd''', Elizabeth Kelly is requesting feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles. [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit# Please comment!]


	If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our		If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our
	[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)		[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up! :-)