<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Trehuaj</id>
	<title>DLF Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Trehuaj"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/Special:Contributions/Trehuaj"/>
	<updated>2026-05-07T07:08:52Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=NDSA:November_26,_2012_Standards_Working_Group_Notes&amp;diff=4915</id>
		<title>NDSA:November 26, 2012 Standards Working Group Notes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=NDSA:November_26,_2012_Standards_Working_Group_Notes&amp;diff=4915"/>
		<updated>2012-11-29T20:00:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Trehuaj: /* WebEx meeting notes, November 26, 2012 */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== WebEx meeting notes, November 26, 2012 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attending: Andrea Goethals, Kate Zwaard (note taker), Meg Philips, Kate Murray, Nancy McGovern, John Spencer, Mary Vardigan, Carol Kussman, Dina Sokolova, Emily Shaw, Aaron Trehub, Butch Lazorchak, Carl Fleishhauer, Amy Kirchhoff&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;(Apologies if I have left anyone out, please feel free to add your name.)&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Opening ===&lt;br /&gt;
2 new members introduced themselves:&lt;br /&gt;
* Kate Zwaard, Library of Congress&lt;br /&gt;
* Nancy McGovern, MIT Libraries&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Staffing Survey ===&lt;br /&gt;
* A reminder to please contribute to the lessons learned while they&#039;re still fresh&lt;br /&gt;
** http://www.loc.gov/extranet/wiki/osi/ndiip/ndsa/index.php?title=Staffing_survey_planning_page&lt;br /&gt;
* How do we expand participation, especially to commercial institutions and institutions with large content collections&lt;br /&gt;
* The instructions for only one respondent per institution may have made it difficult for large institutions to participate (i.e., who is responsible for responding)&lt;br /&gt;
** Perhaps solicit individually. Get the list of the NDSA representative for each institution, enlist their help.&lt;br /&gt;
* Please consider joining the publish team (a great way to get a publication on your resume) or the archive team&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== WikiProject ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrea reported that Columbia is continuing to make progress on restructuring and rewriting the Digital Preservation article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New Projects Brainstorming ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Certifications&lt;br /&gt;
** Would like to hear from people involved in peer review.&lt;br /&gt;
** NCPSR involved in the Data Seal of Approval, a community model that involves peer review&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Standards&lt;br /&gt;
** Looking at which standards are being adopted. Trending up or trending down.&lt;br /&gt;
** Concern about survey fatigue&lt;br /&gt;
** Could be a qualitative look, perhaps in-group. Look to the Storage Survey as a model&lt;br /&gt;
** Possible questions: what standards are you using and why? Why other standards did you consider? What standards did you migrate from?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Terms of Service&lt;br /&gt;
** Human-readable explanation of preservation commitment&lt;br /&gt;
** Also terms of service repositories enter into for hosted services&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* File formats, Specifically PDF/A-3&lt;br /&gt;
** Follow-up from the Signal Blog post and related discussion.&lt;br /&gt;
** Stated need for a document that describes flavors of PDFs broadly and the strengths and weaknesses of each sub category. Information earlier in the lifecycle would be helpful for folks.&lt;br /&gt;
** Use case: a deposit wrapping everything in PDF/A, including audio and video, which is preventing the repository (NARA) from doing file more identification&lt;br /&gt;
** Harvard has &amp;quot;opaque objects&amp;quot; to support the submission of any file format, which can sometimes tempt people away from more fully supported file formats&lt;br /&gt;
** Portico would rather unknown files rather than those same files wrapped in a PDF, even if they can&#039;t identify them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Digital Preservation Profiles, similar to the Data Curation Profiles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Levels of preservation and stages of development&lt;br /&gt;
** Meg and Jefferson Bailey submitted a proposal to SAA comparing the NDSA levels of preservation to other electronic records preservation models with levels&lt;br /&gt;
** A document that describes different models with levels of preservation, comparing similarities and analyzing gaps&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lots of Interest in and who volunteered to write it up&lt;br /&gt;
** PDF/A-3 guidelines, Kate Murray&lt;br /&gt;
** Levels of preservation guidelines, Meg Phillips&lt;br /&gt;
** Certifications, Nancy McGovern and Mary Vardigan&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wiki Project ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrea reported that Columbia is continuing to make progress on restructuring and rewriting the Digital Preservation article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Closing ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Next call the week of December 17th&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Trehuaj</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>