<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thompsonsa82</id>
	<title>DLF Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Thompsonsa82"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/Special:Contributions/Thompsonsa82"/>
	<updated>2026-04-16T20:15:12Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=18567</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=18567"/>
		<updated>2026-02-02T20:24:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is currently investigating new projects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Content Reuse Working Group Charge ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group will research, develop, and/or deploy recommended practices for digital content reuse in galleries, libraries, archives, museums, repositories, and other cultural heritage organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 2019 through June 2023, members of the working group designed and deployed the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)]. D-CRAFT helps digital library practitioners measure the use and reuse of their digital objects. The toolkit can help streamline the reuse assessment process and make it more efficient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The toolkit contains:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* How to use [https://reuse.diglib.org/toolkit/ 10 different assessment methods]&lt;br /&gt;
* An interactive [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/tutorials/ tutorial] for each method&lt;br /&gt;
* How to [https://reuse.diglib.org/toolkit/telling-stories-of-impact/ tell stories of impact]&lt;br /&gt;
* How to [https://reuse.diglib.org/toolkit/writing-a-takedown-policy/ write a takedown policy]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://reuse.diglib.org/ethical-guidelines/ Ethical guidelines]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://reuse.diglib.org/related-resources/ Related resources]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://reuse.diglib.org/glossary/ Glossary] of terms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project team was assisted by [https://reuse.diglib.org/project-team/consultants-experts/ project consultants, experts], and an [https://reuse.diglib.org/project-team/advisory-group/ advisory group].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=16303</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=16303"/>
		<updated>2022-10-09T22:21:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Project Team */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Content Reuse Working Group] is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/d-craft/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 4 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in June 2023. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Current Members =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Former Members =====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=16018</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=16018"/>
		<updated>2021-11-30T15:56:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Content Reuse Working Group] is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/d-craft/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 4 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in June 2023. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14790</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14790"/>
		<updated>2019-09-26T16:49:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Background */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/Reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/UX]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to the 2018 DLF Forum, User Experience and Content Reuse became their own formal Working Groups, retiring the User Studies Working Group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DLF AIG Slack ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Slack is a space to facilitate collaboration and productivity across AIG working groups. It is also a space for discussion around various aspects of digital library assessment. The workspace is open to all who are interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment. No assessment experience is required or assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DLF AIG Slack membership is available via invite. If you&#039;d like to join the DLF AIG Slack workspace, please review and complete the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSerRD5r57NGXF3lqtIim4t6Y8UhpLj86O7QmsXnfj1D7sLYFQ/viewform sign-up form] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Previous Events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14789</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14789"/>
		<updated>2019-09-26T16:42:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Content Reuse Working Group] is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/d-craft/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14788</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14788"/>
		<updated>2019-09-26T16:41:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/d-craft/ Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT)] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14787</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14787"/>
		<updated>2019-09-26T16:40:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* About the Project */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14786</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14786"/>
		<updated>2019-09-26T16:40:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/home/measuringreuse/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14785</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14785"/>
		<updated>2019-09-25T17:44:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/Reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/UX]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DLF AIG Slack ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Slack is a space to facilitate collaboration and productivity across AIG working groups. It is also a space for discussion around various aspects of digital library assessment. The workspace is open to all who are interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment. No assessment experience is required or assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DLF AIG Slack membership is available via invite. If you&#039;d like to join the DLF AIG Slack workspace, please review and complete the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSerRD5r57NGXF3lqtIim4t6Y8UhpLj86O7QmsXnfj1D7sLYFQ/viewform sign-up form] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Previous Events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14784</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14784"/>
		<updated>2019-09-25T16:34:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] &#039;&#039;&#039;(DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039;. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14782</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14782"/>
		<updated>2019-09-23T21:44:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/Reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/UX]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DLF AIG Slack ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Slack is a space to facilitate collaboration and productivity across AIG working groups. It is also a space for discussion around various aspects of digital library assessment. The workspace is open to all who are interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment. No assessment experience is required or assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DLF AIG Slack membership is available via invite. If you&#039;d like to join the DLF AIG Slack workspace, please review and complete the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSerRD5r57NGXF3lqtIim4t6Y8UhpLj86O7QmsXnfj1D7sLYFQ/viewform sign-up form] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14741</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14741"/>
		<updated>2019-07-09T17:39:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039; in September 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of working group conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the digital library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an IMLS National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14740</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14740"/>
		<updated>2019-07-09T17:37:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039; in September 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19]) from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
D-CRAFT will be an open access, collaboratively-developed toolkit. The group&#039;s aim is to develop a resource that will:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Provide an overview of available assessment tools, best practices, and a code of ethics for measuring the reuse of digital assets, facilitating both standardization and impact measurement in the digital library field.&lt;br /&gt;
* Identify sustainable and vetted assessment methods that can be applied to a broad array of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Promote exemplary stewardship of library and museum digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* Allow libraries, data archives, and other cultural heritage and knowledge organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital library materials. &lt;br /&gt;
* Standardize approaches and best practices for communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural impact of digital collections, and support the use of evidence-based approaches to build inclusive user-centered platforms and systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project will take 2.5 years to complete, starting in July 2019 and ending in December 2021. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of the Content Reuse Working Group of the Digital Library Federation (DLF)’s Assessment Interest Group (AIG) conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the Digital Library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute for Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14739</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14739"/>
		<updated>2019-07-09T17:30:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039; in September 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Content Reuse Working Group is thrilled to participate in a National Leadership Grants for Libraries project grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-36-19-0036-19 LG-36-19-0036-19])from the [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute of Museum and Library Services] to develop D-CRAFT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of D-CRAFT will allow cultural heritage organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital content. It will standardize approaches and recommended practices for assessing and communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural value and impact of digital collections. Ultimately, it will support the use of evidence-based approaches to build and improve on inclusive, user-centered platforms, systems, and collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of the Content Reuse Working Group of the Digital Library Federation (DLF)’s Assessment Interest Group (AIG) conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the Digital Library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute for Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14663</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14663"/>
		<updated>2019-04-01T18:44:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Project Team */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039; in September 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the findings from the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project, members of the Content Reuse Working Group have submitted an IMLS National Leadership Grants for Libraries proposal to build D-CRAFT. If awarded, the project will begin in Summer 2019 and last 2.5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of D-CRAFT will allow cultural heritage organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital content. It will standardize approaches and recommended practices for assessing and communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural value and impact of digital collections. Ultimately, it will support the use of evidence-based approaches to build and improve on inclusive, user-centered platforms, systems, and collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Kinza Masood, Mountain West Digital Library&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ali Shiri, University of Alberta&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of the Content Reuse Working Group of the Digital Library Federation (DLF)’s Assessment Interest Group (AIG) conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the Digital Library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute for Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14275</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14275"/>
		<updated>2018-09-28T03:43:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT). The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BQJVR)&#039;&#039;&#039; in September 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the findings from the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project, members of the Content Reuse Working Group have submitted an IMLS National Leadership Grants for Libraries proposal to build D-CRAFT. If awarded, the project will begin in Summer 2019 and last 2.5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of D-CRAFT will allow cultural heritage organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital content. It will standardize approaches and recommended practices for assessing and communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural value and impact of digital collections. Ultimately, it will support the use of evidence-based approaches to build and improve on inclusive, user-centered platforms, systems, and collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018, members of the Content Reuse Working Group of the Digital Library Federation (DLF)’s Assessment Interest Group (AIG) conducted the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. The project conducted a formal needs assessment of the Digital Library community to determine desired functionality for a future reuse assessment toolkit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project was sponsored by an [https://www.imls.gov/ Institute for Museum and Library Services] (IMLS) National Leadership/National Forum grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) award. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018 the project team released [https://osf.io/y9ghc/ Setting a Foundation for Assessing Content Reuse: A White Paper From the Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project. This white paper (a) provides a broad overview of the Measuring Reuse project, including background information on the AIG, (b) outlines the methods used by the project team, (c) summarizes results, and (d) discusses potential next steps.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14274</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14274"/>
		<updated>2018-09-26T19:06:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the findings from the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project, members of the Content Reuse Working Group have submitted an IMLS National Leadership Grants for Libraries proposal to build D-CRAFT. If awarded, the project will begin in Summer 2019 and last 2.5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of D-CRAFT will allow cultural heritage organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital content. It will standardize approaches and recommended practices for assessing and communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural value and impact of digital collections. Ultimately, it will support the use of evidence-based approaches to build and improve on inclusive, user-centered platforms, systems, and collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017 the Content Reuse Working Group received a [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects], which identified needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Proposed Deliverables ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (A) in-person and (B) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (C) pre- and (D) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14273</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14273"/>
		<updated>2018-09-26T19:06:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing the Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digital Content Reuse Assessment Framework Toolkit (D-CRAFT) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About the Project ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building on the findings from the [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] project, members of the Content Reuse Working Group have submitted an IMLS National Leadership Grants for Libraries proposal to build D-CRAFT. If awarded, the project will begin in Summer 2019 and last 2.5 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== About D-CRAFT ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The development of D-CRAFT will allow cultural heritage organizations to better understand the ways users engage with, reuse, and transform digital content. It will standardize approaches and recommended practices for assessing and communicating the economic, educational, scholarly, scientific, social, and cultural value and impact of digital collections. Ultimately, it will support the use of evidence-based approaches to build and improve on inclusive, user-centered platforms, systems, and collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein Kenfield, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017 the Content Reuse Working Group received a [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects], which identified needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Proposed Deliverables ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (A) in-person and (B) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (C) pre- and (D) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Project Team ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The group&#039;s work is archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14272</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=14272"/>
		<updated>2018-09-26T18:45:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the Content Reuse Working Group is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects], which will identify needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (A) in-person and (B) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (C) pre- and (D) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14271</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=14271"/>
		<updated>2018-09-26T18:44:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/Reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User/UX]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DLF AIG Slack ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Slack is a space to facilitate collaboration and productivity across AIG working groups. It is also a space for discussion around various aspects of digital library assessment. The workspace is open to all who are interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment. No assessment experience is required or assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DLF AIG Slack membership is available via invite. If you&#039;d like to join the DLF AIG Slack workspace, please review and complete the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSerRD5r57NGXF3lqtIim4t6Y8UhpLj86O7QmsXnfj1D7sLYFQ/viewform sign-up form] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User_Studies&amp;diff=14270</id>
		<title>Assessment:User Studies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User_Studies&amp;diff=14270"/>
		<updated>2018-09-26T18:40:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The User Studies Working Group compiled resources, conducted research, and drafted literature to assist those who are interesting in evaluating users of digital repositories and their needs. The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9NBQG)&#039;&#039;&#039; in December 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The User Studies Working Group is not currently active. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxKlOQm6nnVndnJrR200UFZoSm8&amp;amp;usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Their work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/s9ug4/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Closer look at usability and reuse (2016-2017) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After discussions at the 2015 DLF Forum [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing Assessment Lunch], the User Studies Working Group decided to form two subgroups to explore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Developing guidelines and best practices for user/usability study development&lt;br /&gt;
* Drafting a grant proposal to conduct a needs assessment for a toolkit to assess digital library reuse&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on this work, the User Studies Working Group focused on two projects in 2017:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Developing [[Assessment:User/Usability Studies Guidelines and Best Practices | guidelines and best practices in digital library user experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducting a [[Assessment:User/Reuse | needs assessment for a toolkit to assess digital library reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both groups are still active and, as of 2018, exist as their own separate working groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Usability Standardization ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building off of data used to write [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the Usability Standards Subgroup focused on standardizing usability terms and processes by creating tags from existing literature on digital library usability. You can find more information on their work from the subgroup&#039;s [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8QIcqLZNmd3Wk5meW84U3IwRVE Google Drive].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The User Studies Working Group white paper (2014-2015) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Participants identified four assessment topics to explore during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit Assessment Breakout Session] at the 2014 DLF Forum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# User/Usability studies&lt;br /&gt;
# Identifying users and uses&lt;br /&gt;
# Return On Investment (ROI)&lt;br /&gt;
# Reuse of content/what do users do with content&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These four groups will make up the focus of a white paper on assessing users and user needs.  The working group will complete a series of tasks to generate the white paper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Compile a [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AVlT3QlmhbcUmoRtZ0hpvEhpbD9_Eld5bHsa-JNHX24/edit?usp=sharing bibliography]&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop a literature review -- &#039;&#039;&#039;Completed&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# Release [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jd7N6BMh7g1DbgSpL0vigY4s87k7UQjOJLvgYYkqP0c/edit?usp=sharing &#039;&#039;&#039;Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries&#039;&#039;&#039;] for public comment&lt;br /&gt;
# Release final draft of [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ &#039;&#039;&#039;Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries&#039;&#039;&#039;] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== White Paper Participants ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== White Paper Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Joyce Chapman, Duke University&lt;br /&gt;
* Megan Hurst, Athenaeum21 Consulting&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Co-Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University (Co-Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tao Zhang, Purdue University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Literature Review Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Joyce Chapman, Duke University&lt;br /&gt;
* Jody DeRidder, University of Alabama&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Trent, State Library of North Carolina&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Bibliography Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Trent, George Washington University&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
* Tao Zhang, Purdue University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13625</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13625"/>
		<updated>2018-06-15T16:10:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Get Involved */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== DLF AIG Slack ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Slack is a space to facilitate collaboration and productivity across AIG working groups. It is also a space for discussion around various aspects of digital library assessment. The workspace is open to all who are interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment. No assessment experience is required or assumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DLF AIG Slack membership is available via invite. If you&#039;d like to join the DLF AIG Slack workspace, please review and complete the [https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSerRD5r57NGXF3lqtIim4t6Y8UhpLj86O7QmsXnfj1D7sLYFQ/viewform sign-up form] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=13622</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=13622"/>
		<updated>2018-06-07T17:05:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* DLF Working Groups */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcome!&#039;&#039;&#039; DLF&#039;s wiki was created in 2014 for our various [https://www.diglib.org/groups/ interest groups] and affiliated organizations to share information, best practices, and community notes. (See the main [https://diglib.org/ Digital Library Federation website] for info on DLF programs, fellowships, publications, and events.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;This wiki is also the home of our DLF Organizers&#039; Toolkit!&#039;&#039;&#039; [[File:Organizing-with-DLF.png|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DLF Organizers&#039; Toolkit == &lt;br /&gt;
# [[About DLF and the Organizers&#039; Toolkit]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Working with Team DLF]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Starting a New Initiative or Working Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[General Facilitation and Goal-Setting]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Facilitating for Diversity and Inclusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Preventing and Managing Burnout]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Gathering Info/Building Enthusiasm]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Planning an In-Person Meetup]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Setting Up Year-Round Meetings]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Planning Virtual Meetings and Webinars]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Talking and Writing]] &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Organizing and Sharing Your Work]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[In a Nutshell]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hosted/Sponsored Groups and Projects ==  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NDSA:Main Page|National Digital Stewardship Alliance]] ([http://ndsa.org NDSA])&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[eResearch Network]] &lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Legible Learning]] Project (coming Summer 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
*annual [[AMIA-DLF Hack Days]] (2013-present)&lt;br /&gt;
*annual [[Endangered Data Week]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DLF Working Groups ==  &lt;br /&gt;
Not all DLF groups maintain wiki pages. Find more activity [https://www.diglib.org/groups/ here]. [[File:DLFgroupsposter.jpg|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF Working Group on [[Labor | Labor in Digital Libraries]]&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Transparency-Accountability | Government Records Transparency &amp;amp; Accountability]] Interest Group&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Assessment | Assessment Interest Group]] (AIG)  &lt;br /&gt;
# [[Assessment:Costs | AIG Cost Assessment Group]] (home of the [http://dashboard.diglib.org DLF Digitization Cost Calculator])&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment | AIG Cultural Assessment Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Assessment:Metadata | AIG Metadata Assessment Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
#  [[Assessment:User Studies | AIG User Studies Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
## [[Assessment:User/UX | AIG User/UX Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
## [[Assessment:User/Reuse | AIG Content Reuse Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Pedagogy | Digital Library Pedagogy Group]] (aka #DLFteach)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Pedagogy:Outreach | #DLFteach Outreach Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Pedagogy:Professional Development | #DLFteach Professional Development Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Pedagogy:DOCC | #DLFteach DOCC Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[DLF Project Managers Group | Project Managers Group]] (PMG)&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Metadata Support Group]] (MSG)&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF Working Group on [[Technologies of Surveillance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*DLF [[Digital Scholarship Working Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Digitization and CLIR Hidden Collections Resources == &lt;br /&gt;
These resources will be of particular interest to grant applicants for CLIR&#039;s [https://www.clir.org/fellowships/hiddencollections Hidden Collections] and [https://www.clir.org/recordings-at-risk Recordings at Risk] programs and to anyone planning a digitization project.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dashboard.diglib.org DLF Digitization Cost Calculator]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Digitizing Special Formats]] (resource library)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Strategies for Advancing Hidden Collections]] free webinars and helpful guides &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.clir.org/hiddencollections/applicant-resources/#toolkit Hidden Collections Applicant Toolkit videos] created by DLF&lt;br /&gt;
# [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Epk3OwOQqvI Common Challenges]&lt;br /&gt;
# [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s18DaM6TXHE Rights, Ethics, and Re-Use]&lt;br /&gt;
# [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNPvuWnTJhg Sustainability]&lt;br /&gt;
# [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qd4tWzlelWs Institutional Capacity + Community]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Need help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
Contact [https://www.diglib.org/about/staff/ Team DLF] or email info(at)diglib.org to have editing privileges enabled or to ask for help at any time! &lt;br /&gt;
* Editing syntax, etc: [//meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents MediaWiki User&#039;s Guide] &lt;br /&gt;
* [//www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:FAQ MediaWiki FAQ]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13528</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13528"/>
		<updated>2018-04-30T17:05:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://wke.lt/w/s/7knzI Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13515</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13515"/>
		<updated>2018-04-17T21:52:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Archived Chat URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/ccd1a857-e15c-4442-8c02-47a8ebb91b95 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://wakelet.com/wake/f3111b7b-7bab-432c-9214-d63e2c2f8f80 Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13511</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13511"/>
		<updated>2018-04-12T21:07:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/user-personas-for-digital-collections Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 25, 2018, 2 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13510</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13510"/>
		<updated>2018-04-12T21:06:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/user-personas-for-digital-collections Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/2018/04/12/analytics-altmetrics-and-reuse-twitter-chat-april-25/ Analytics, Altmetrics, and Reuse Twitter Chat]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13505</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13505"/>
		<updated>2018-04-06T00:57:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/user-personas-for-digital-collections Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#digreuse&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|Summer 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13287</id>
		<title>Assessment:Citations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13287"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T19:56:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group is currently not active. Citations Working Group work is archived using the [https://osf.io/fd6uh/ Open Science Framework].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions please contribute to the discussion through the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment DLF AIG Google Group] or contact Elizabeth Joan Kelly at [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Citations Working Group formed in the Fall of 2014 following the successful launch of the larger DLF AIG at the 2014 DLF forum. Volunteers interested in developing best practices for creating and displaying citations for digital library assets were solicited through the Digital Library Assessment Google Group. The citations working group was tasked with answering the following questions: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are the limitations of current digital library software systems for displaying citation information? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group was further split up to accomplish the following goals:&lt;br /&gt;
# Draft citation standards, based on what can and can&#039;t be incorporated into APA, Chicago, and MLA, that incorporate the necessary elements for digitized special collections and institutional repository content&lt;br /&gt;
# Explore how best to display citation information in page markup so reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote Web can easily parse the pages to import complete citation information&lt;br /&gt;
# Compile information on the technical issues for displaying citations from major software systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first goal involving draft citation standards was completed for DLF 2015. An [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/ initial draft] was circulated to the DLF Assessment group using Google Docs from March 6 through April 3, 2015. At that point comments and edits that were grammar and/or punctuation-related as well as suggestions to clarify text were resolved, and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b9G72sjkL35uYQGEcGiL_WcUjm0qdlE2zoVYdgKjldA/ a new document] was moved to for further editing. Additional comments were invited through April 24, 2015. The resulting white paper, &#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;quot;Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets&amp;quot; (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/98TAS) is available [https://osf.io/98tas/ here]. &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract of &amp;quot;Guidelines for Citing Library-hosted, Unique Digital Assets&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These draft guidelines were developed in response to a call for steps forward made by the Digital Library Federation (DLF) Assessment subgroup on Benefits. One of the areas identified for development included the establishment of best practices and guidelines for citing digital libraries. Most if not all major citation styles do not provide direction for citing digital objects, and it is difficult for the administrators of digital repositories to use traditional citation metrics to track the use of their digital objects in scholarly output. Scholarly literature has recently begun to focus on challenges and best practices for citing data sets. In addition, some citation styles, as well as individual institutions, provide guidelines for citing special collections materials. Much of this work can be drawn upon in order to format citations for digitized special collection and cultural heritage materials (e.g. rare books, manuscript materials, images, moving images, etc.) and institutional repository content. These guidelines attempt to address the following questions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document outlines suggested citation guidelines in an attempt to fill in gaps when the citation style does not give guidelines for a type of source—in this case, institutional repository and digitized cultural heritage objects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== White Paper Author and Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans (author), [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Acknowledgements&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following people provided valuable feedback, edits, and comments on the various drafts of this document:&lt;br /&gt;
* Geoffrey Bilder&lt;br /&gt;
* Bianca Crowley&lt;br /&gt;
* Jody DeRidder&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin Hawkins&lt;br /&gt;
* Stacy Konkiel&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrillidou&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Landis&lt;br /&gt;
* Elliot D. Williams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document was presented and discussed at the 2015 Digital Library Federation Forum as part of the session  &amp;quot;Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report&amp;quot; on Monday, October 26 at 1:30pm Pacific Time. The session was available via live-streaming during the conference, and the recording is archived online at the [https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/55474/items/1.0220854 University of British Columbia]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13286</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13286"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T19:30:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/user-personas-for-digital-collections Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13285</id>
		<title>Assessment:Citations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13285"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T19:21:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group is currently not active. Citations Working Group work is archived using the [https://osf.io/fd6uh/ Open Science Framework].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions please contribute to the discussion through the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment DLF AIG Google Group] or contact Elizabeth Joan Kelly at [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Publications from the DLF AIG Citations Working Group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/98TAS) is available [https://osf.io/98tas/ here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Citations Working Group formed in the Fall of 2014 following the successful launch of the larger DLF AIG at the 2014 DLF forum. Volunteers interested in developing best practices for creating and displaying citations for digital library assets were solicited through the Digital Library Assessment Google Group. The citations working group was tasked with answering the following questions: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are the limitations of current digital library software systems for displaying citation information? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group was further split up to accomplish the following goals:&lt;br /&gt;
# Draft citation standards, based on what can and can&#039;t be incorporated into APA, Chicago, and MLA, that incorporate the necessary elements for digitized special collections and institutional repository content&lt;br /&gt;
# Explore how best to display citation information in page markup so reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote Web can easily parse the pages to import complete citation information&lt;br /&gt;
# Compile information on the technical issues for displaying citations from major software systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of DLF 2015, the first goal involving draft citation standards has been completed. An [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/ initial draft] was circulated to the DLF Assessment group using Google Docs from March 6 through April 3, 2015. At that point comments and edits that were grammar and/or punctuation-related as well as suggestions to clarify text were resolved, and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b9G72sjkL35uYQGEcGiL_WcUjm0qdlE2zoVYdgKjldA/ a new document] was moved to for further editing. Additional comments were invited through April 24, 2015. The resulting white paper, &amp;quot;Guidelines for Citing Library-hosted, Unique Digital Assets,&amp;quot; is now available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/98TAS) is available [https://osf.io/98tas/ here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract of &amp;quot;Guidelines for Citing Library-hosted, Unique Digital Assets&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These draft guidelines were developed in response to a call for steps forward made by the Digital Library Federation (DLF) Assessment subgroup on Benefits. One of the areas identified for development included the establishment of best practices and guidelines for citing digital libraries. Most if not all major citation styles do not provide direction for citing digital objects, and it is difficult for the administrators of digital repositories to use traditional citation metrics to track the use of their digital objects in scholarly output. Scholarly literature has recently begun to focus on challenges and best practices for citing data sets. In addition, some citation styles, as well as individual institutions, provide guidelines for citing special collections materials. Much of this work can be drawn upon in order to format citations for digitized special collection and cultural heritage materials (e.g. rare books, manuscript materials, images, moving images, etc.) and institutional repository content. These guidelines attempt to address the following questions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document outlines suggested citation guidelines in an attempt to fill in gaps when the citation style does not give guidelines for a type of source—in this case, institutional repository and digitized cultural heritage objects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== White Paper Author and Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans (author), [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Acknowledgements&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following people provided valuable feedback, edits, and comments on the various drafts of this document:&lt;br /&gt;
* Geoffrey Bilder&lt;br /&gt;
* Bianca Crowley&lt;br /&gt;
* Jody DeRidder&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin Hawkins&lt;br /&gt;
* Stacy Konkiel&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrillidou&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Landis&lt;br /&gt;
* Elliot D. Williams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document was presented and discussed at the 2015 Digital Library Federation Forum as part of the session  &amp;quot;Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report&amp;quot; on Monday, October 26 at 1:30pm Pacific Time. The session was available via live-streaming during the conference, and the recording is archived online at the [https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/55474/items/1.0220854 University of British Columbia]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13284</id>
		<title>Assessment:Citations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Citations&amp;diff=13284"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:50:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group is currently not active. Citations Working Group work is archived using the [https://osf.io/fd6uh/ Open Science Framework].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contribute to the discussion through the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment DLF AIG Google Group], or contact Elizabeth Joan Kelly at [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Publications from the DLF AIG Citations Working Group ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/98TAS) is available [https://osf.io/98tas/ here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG Citations Working Group formed in the Fall of 2014 following the successful launch of the larger DLF AIG at the 2014 DLF forum. Volunteers interested in developing best practices for creating and displaying citations for digital library assets were solicited through the Digital Library Assessment Google Group. The citations working group was tasked with answering the following questions: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are the limitations of current digital library software systems for displaying citation information? &lt;br /&gt;
# What are best practices for displaying citation information for reference manager software capture? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Citations Working Group was further split up to accomplish the following goals:&lt;br /&gt;
# Draft citation standards, based on what can and can&#039;t be incorporated into APA, Chicago, and MLA, that incorporate the necessary elements for digitized special collections and institutional repository content&lt;br /&gt;
# Explore how best to display citation information in page markup so reference managers like Mendeley, Zotero, and EndNote Web can easily parse the pages to import complete citation information&lt;br /&gt;
# Compile information on the technical issues for displaying citations from major software systems&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of DLF 2015, the first goal involving draft citation standards has been completed. An [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/ initial draft] was circulated to the DLF Assessment group using Google Docs from March 6 through April 3, 2015. At that point comments and edits that were grammar and/or punctuation-related as well as suggestions to clarify text were resolved, and [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b9G72sjkL35uYQGEcGiL_WcUjm0qdlE2zoVYdgKjldA/ a new document] was moved to for further editing. Additional comments were invited through April 24, 2015. The resulting white paper, &amp;quot;Guidelines for Citing Library-hosted, Unique Digital Assets,&amp;quot; is now available.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Guidelines for citing library-hosted, unique digital assets (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/98TAS) is available [https://osf.io/98tas/ here].&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abstract of &amp;quot;Guidelines for Citing Library-hosted, Unique Digital Assets&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These draft guidelines were developed in response to a call for steps forward made by the Digital Library Federation (DLF) Assessment subgroup on Benefits. One of the areas identified for development included the establishment of best practices and guidelines for citing digital libraries. Most if not all major citation styles do not provide direction for citing digital objects, and it is difficult for the administrators of digital repositories to use traditional citation metrics to track the use of their digital objects in scholarly output. Scholarly literature has recently begun to focus on challenges and best practices for citing data sets. In addition, some citation styles, as well as individual institutions, provide guidelines for citing special collections materials. Much of this work can be drawn upon in order to format citations for digitized special collection and cultural heritage materials (e.g. rare books, manuscript materials, images, moving images, etc.) and institutional repository content. These guidelines attempt to address the following questions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# What should a citation consist of?&lt;br /&gt;
# How can we best support appropriate citations?&lt;br /&gt;
# To what extent do common citation formats support this?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document outlines suggested citation guidelines in an attempt to fill in gaps when the citation style does not give guidelines for a type of source—in this case, institutional repository and digitized cultural heritage objects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== White Paper Author and Contributors ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans (author), [mailto:ejkelly@loyno.edu ejkelly at loyno.edu]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Acknowledgements&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following people provided valuable feedback, edits, and comments on the various drafts of this document:&lt;br /&gt;
* Geoffrey Bilder&lt;br /&gt;
* Bianca Crowley&lt;br /&gt;
* Jody DeRidder&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin Hawkins&lt;br /&gt;
* Stacy Konkiel&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrillidou&lt;br /&gt;
* Bill Landis&lt;br /&gt;
* Elliot D. Williams&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This document was presented and discussed at the 2015 Digital Library Federation Forum as part of the session  &amp;quot;Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report&amp;quot; on Monday, October 26 at 1:30pm Pacific Time. The session was available via live-streaming during the conference, and the recording is archived online at the [https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/55474/items/1.0220854 University of British Columbia]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13283</id>
		<title>Assessment:Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13283"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:40:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our &lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up!  :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039; Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 &amp;quot;Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories&amp;quot;]. &#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
# Create operational definitions of value for digital libraries in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Assess alignment of benefits with institutional goals&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop standardized methods, comparable across institutions, to measure the benefits&lt;br /&gt;
The latter might include:&lt;br /&gt;
  * Altmetrics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Citations&lt;br /&gt;
  * Web stats and Google Analytics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)&lt;br /&gt;
  * Address special challenges raised by aggregation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We shared resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles.  [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit#  Now Closed].  She incorporated suggestions and recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13282</id>
		<title>Assessment:Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13282"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:36:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our &lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up!  :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 &amp;quot;Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
# Create operational definitions of value for digital libraries in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Assess alignment of benefits with institutional goals&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop standardized methods, comparable across institutions, to measure the benefits&lt;br /&gt;
The latter might include:&lt;br /&gt;
  * Altmetrics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Citations&lt;br /&gt;
  * Web stats and Google Analytics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)&lt;br /&gt;
  * Address special challenges raised by aggregation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We shared resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles.  [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit#  Now Closed].  She incorporated suggestions and recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13281</id>
		<title>Assessment:Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13281"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:35:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our &lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up!  :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 &amp;quot;Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
# Create operational definitions of value for digital libraries in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Assess alignment of benefits with institutional goals&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop standardized methods, comparable across institutions, to measure the benefits&lt;br /&gt;
The latter might include:&lt;br /&gt;
  * Altmetrics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Citations&lt;br /&gt;
  * Web stats and Google Analytics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)&lt;br /&gt;
  * Address special challenges raised by aggregation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We shared resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles.  [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit#  Now Closed].  She incorporated suggestions and recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13280</id>
		<title>Assessment:Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:Benefits&amp;diff=13280"/>
		<updated>2018-01-17T18:30:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Current Projects */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Benefits Working Group focused on establishing best practices and guidelines for digital library assessment. As part of this work, Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 &amp;quot;Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Benefits Working Group is not currently active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== How best can we measure the benefits of digital libraries? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential steps to establish best practices and guidelines may include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
# Create operational definitions of value for digital libraries in general&lt;br /&gt;
# Assess alignment of benefits with institutional goals&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop standardized methods, comparable across institutions, to measure the benefits&lt;br /&gt;
The latter might include:&lt;br /&gt;
  * Altmetrics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Citations&lt;br /&gt;
  * Web stats and Google Analytics&lt;br /&gt;
  * Other measurements and methods (such as surveys, focus groups)&lt;br /&gt;
  * Address special challenges raised by aggregation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are sharing resources on [[Assessment:Altmetrics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We formed a working group on [[Assessment:Citations]] and another on [[Assessment:Analytics]], that we hope will have progress to share at the next [http://www.diglib.org/forums/2015forum/ DLF Forum]!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For several weeks in early 2015, Elizabeth Kelly requested feedback on proposed best practices for citing digitized content and institutional repository content using 3 major citation styles.  [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1o_ROgzDKdBJKtWdl80Dh_bQKVg-y33EdXgc5cK64Y70/edit#  Now Closed].  She is incorporating suggestions and recommendations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stacy Konkiel, Michelle Dalmau and David Scherer have published a white paper on [http://figshare.com/articles/Altmetrics_and_analytics_for_digital_special_collections_and_institutional_repositories/1392140 &amp;quot;Altmetrics and analytics for digital special collections and institutional repositories&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested in helping us develop best practices and guidelines for measuring benefits of digital libraries, please join our &lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group] and speak up!  :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13249</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13249"/>
		<updated>2017-12-21T15:32:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/user-personas-for-digital-collections Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13228</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13228"/>
		<updated>2017-11-29T20:05:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#dlfaig&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13227</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13227"/>
		<updated>2017-11-29T20:04:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|[http://critlib.org/user-personas-for-digital-collections/ Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories]  &lt;br /&gt;
|TBD&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13220</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13220"/>
		<updated>2017-11-17T15:30:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017, 9 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories  &lt;br /&gt;
|TBD&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13206</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13206"/>
		<updated>2017-10-16T21:23:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 5, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories  &lt;br /&gt;
|TBD&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User_Studies&amp;diff=13197</id>
		<title>Assessment:User Studies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User_Studies&amp;diff=13197"/>
		<updated>2017-10-02T14:35:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The User Studies Working Group compiles resources, conducts research, and drafts literature to assist those who are interesting in evaluating users of digital repositories and their needs. The group released &#039;&#039;&#039;[https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries] (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/9NBQG)&#039;&#039;&#039; in December 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The User Studies Working Group is focusing on two projects in 2017:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Developing [[Assessment:User/Usability Studies Guidelines and Best Practices | guidelines and best practices in digital library user experience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Conducting a [[Assessment:User/Reuse | needs assessment for a toolkit to assess digital library reuse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BxKlOQm6nnVndnJrR200UFZoSm8&amp;amp;usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/s9ug4/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Past Projects ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Closer look at usability and reuse (2016) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After discussions at the 2015 DLF Forum [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing Assessment Lunch], the User Studies Working Group decided to form two subgroups to explore:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Developing guidelines and best practices for user/usability study development&lt;br /&gt;
* Drafting a grant proposal to conduct a needs assessment for a toolkit to assess digital library reuse&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Usability Standardization ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Building off of data used to write [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the Usability Standards Subgroup focused on standardizing usability terms and processes by creating tags from existing literature on digital library usability. You can find more information on their work from the subgroup&#039;s [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8QIcqLZNmd3Wk5meW84U3IwRVE Google Drive].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The User Studies Working Group white paper (2014-2015) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Participants identified four assessment topics to explore during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit Assessment Breakout Session] at the 2014 DLF Forum:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# User/Usability studies&lt;br /&gt;
# Identifying users and uses&lt;br /&gt;
# Return On Investment (ROI)&lt;br /&gt;
# Reuse of content/what do users do with content&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These four groups will make up the focus of a white paper on assessing users and user needs.  The working group will complete a series of tasks to generate the white paper:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Compile a [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AVlT3QlmhbcUmoRtZ0hpvEhpbD9_Eld5bHsa-JNHX24/edit?usp=sharing bibliography]&lt;br /&gt;
# Develop a literature review -- &#039;&#039;&#039;Completed&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# Release [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jd7N6BMh7g1DbgSpL0vigY4s87k7UQjOJLvgYYkqP0c/edit?usp=sharing &#039;&#039;&#039;Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries&#039;&#039;&#039;] for public comment&lt;br /&gt;
# Release final draft of [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ &#039;&#039;&#039;Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries&#039;&#039;&#039;] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== White Paper Participants ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== White Paper Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Joyce Chapman, Duke University&lt;br /&gt;
* Megan Hurst, Athenaeum21 Consulting&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Co-Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University (Co-Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tao Zhang, Purdue University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Literature Review Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Joyce Chapman, Duke University&lt;br /&gt;
* Jody DeRidder, University of Alabama&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrillidou, Association of Research Libraries&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Trent, State Library of North Carolina&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===== Bibliography Team =====&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Joan Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston (Leader)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rachel Trent, George Washington University&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
* Tao Zhang, Purdue University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13188</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13188"/>
		<updated>2017-09-19T13:25:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* 2017-2018 Twitter Chats */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://storify.com/CLIRDLF/metadata-assessment-quality-twitter-chat Available here]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 2017 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories  &lt;br /&gt;
|TBD&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=13185</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=13185"/>
		<updated>2017-09-15T13:54:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects], which will identify needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (A) in-person and (B) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (C) pre- and (D) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=13184</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=13184"/>
		<updated>2017-09-15T13:53:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) [https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects], which will identify needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13181</id>
		<title>Assessment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment&amp;diff=13181"/>
		<updated>2017-09-08T15:10:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;= &#039;&#039;&#039;DLF Assessment Interest Group&#039;&#039;&#039; =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [http://www.diglib.org/groups/assessment/ DLF Assessment Interest Group (AIG)], founded in 2014, seeks to engage the community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. This wiki is a central location for documentation and collection of resources to assist those seeking to assess their digital libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Research and cultural heritage institutions are, as a matter of course, providing online access to converted and born-digital scholarly and cultural content. As the amount of that content continues to grow, there is an increased need to strategically standardize our assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DLF AIG is concerned with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* determining how to measure the impact of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* developing areas of commonality and benchmarks in how we measure collections across various platforms&lt;br /&gt;
* understanding cost and benefit of digital collections&lt;br /&gt;
* exploring how can we best collect, analyze, communicate, and share such information effectively across our various stakeholders—from collection managers to scholars&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Working Groups ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Active Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Analytics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Costs]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Cultural Assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Metadata]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:User Studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inactive Groups ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Benefits]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Assessment:Citations]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png|left|frameless|250px|https://wiki.diglib.org/File:Dlf-assessment-pie-chart-not-transparent.png]] The DLF AIG was born in the spring following the 2013 DLF Forum working session, “Hunting for Best Practices in Library Assessment,” which garnered over 50 volunteers to continue the discussion after the conference; a second working session on altmetrics was also met with huge interest. A Digital Library Assessment Google Group was established to provide a space for practitioners to discuss assessment efforts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the 2014 DLF Forum, the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rLdMSPCbR_F-hE0ZhWzS70IBGEMh1450ff0x_ioPrIk/edit#heading=h.v5ec1r31vuuf/ Moving Forward with Digital Library Assessment] panel discussed a new NISO initiative to develop standards for altmetrics, a new web-based cost estimation tool for digitization, and both qualitative and quantitative results from digital library user studies. The panel, like the working group the year before, was followed by a lively discussion about how to further the development of best practices for digital library assessment. Again, many community members volunteered to continue the discussion, and four working groups formed in November 2014. These groups were tasked with developing to best practices centered in the assessment of digital libraries, in the areas of user studies, analytics, cost, and citations as outlined in the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18kOolh-U0qIrT3tcJg8fXMnN5pnKylFpxvtRL561baU/edit?usp=sharing Digital Library Assessment Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each of these four groups worked to develop white papers and tools, which were presented at the 2015 DLF Forum during the [https://docs.google.com/document/d/15-mFHPXjW63srbZ-QZoh5_cAV9BXXNtj5aTQl-DlqO4/edit?usp=sharing/ Collaborative Efforts to Develop Best Practices in Assessment: A Progress Report] panel and lunch sessions. For more information on these working groups and the status of AIG in 2015, see Joyce Chapman, Jody DeRidder, and Santi Thompson&#039;s article on the first year of AIG&#039;s work in [http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november15/chapman/11chapman.html &amp;quot;Developing Best Practices in Digital Library Assessment: Year One Update&amp;quot;] in D-Lib Magazine&#039;s November/December 2015 issue (Volume 21, Number 11/12).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2015 DLF Forum, the AIG discussed the formation of two new groups, focused on metadata and cultural assessment. These two groups were formally established in the months following the 2015 Forum and, along with the analytics, costs, and user studies groups, presented updates at the 2016 DLF Forum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archived Documentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Archived documentation is available at the [https://osf.io/7bawc/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Google Group ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To take part in the conversation, join the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/digital-library-assessment Digital Library Assessment Google Group], which is open to anyone interested in learning about or collaborating on the improvement of digital library assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2017-2018 Twitter Chats ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The AIG will be hosting #DLFAIG Twitter chats over the next year seeking to engage the DLF community in developing best practices and guidelines for various kinds of digital library assessment. With these informal discussions we hope to raise awareness for AIG groups for projects/papers/content they have produced and/or working on and get feedback and insight into our current assessment related projects from the community. Stay tuned for more information!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Schedule and topics for Twitter chats using the hashtag #DLFAIG, unless otherwise noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|+Upcoming Chats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;AIG Working Groups&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Date and Time&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Topic&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Hashtag&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|style=&amp;quot;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | &#039;&#039;&#039;Storify URL&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Metadata Assessment Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|September 18, 2017, 3 PM EDT&lt;br /&gt;
|See [https://docs.google.com/document/d/1A9VCTvuA3NExg6uDYonzFUrPMhEf-7ZQjsfwc9sajGE/edit?usp=sharing Planning Document]&lt;br /&gt;
|#mashcat&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cultural Assessment and User Experience Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|December 2017 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Developing socially inclusive user personas for digital collections and repositories  &lt;br /&gt;
|#critlib&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reuse Working Group&lt;br /&gt;
|February 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|[https://reuse.diglib.org/ Developing a Framework for Measuring Reuse of Digital Objects]&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cost and Web Analytics Working Groups (Joint Chat)&lt;br /&gt;
|April 2018 (More information to come!)&lt;br /&gt;
|Topic to be announced&lt;br /&gt;
|#DLFAIG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released after the chat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8510</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8510"/>
		<updated>2017-04-24T14:36:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Project Team */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) to research the needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8509</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8509"/>
		<updated>2017-04-24T13:56:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Current Project */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) to research the needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrilidou, QualityMetrics&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8508</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8508"/>
		<updated>2017-04-24T13:55:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Proposed Grant Activities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) to research the needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Background ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrilidou, QualityMetrics&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8507</id>
		<title>Assessment:User/Reuse</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.diglib.org/index.php?title=Assessment:User/Reuse&amp;diff=8507"/>
		<updated>2017-04-24T13:55:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thompsonsa82: /* Background */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Building on the recommendations from [https://osf.io/uc8b3/ Surveying the Landscape: Use and Usability Assessment of Digital Libraries], the User Studies Working Group&#039;s Content Reuse subgroup is focused on developing a needs assessment to better understand the desired scope and functionality of a toolkit designed to measure digital library object reuse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Current Project ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Reuse subgroup is thrilled to announce that they are the recipients of a 2017 [https://www.imls.gov/grants/available/national-leadership-grants-libraries IMLS National Leadership for Libraries] grant ([https://www.imls.gov/grants/awarded/lg-73-17-0002-17 LG-73-17-0002-17]) to research the needs and ideal functionality of a digital library object reuse toolkit!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Background ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in July 2017, the Project Team will conduct a year-long formal needs assessment, which will include data collection, analysis, and dissemination. Data collection will occur through (1) in-person and (2) virtual focus group sessions as well as via (3) pre- and (4) post-surveys. Additionally, the Project Team will form an advisory group to provide critical feedback on  methods used for data collection and analysis and on the drafting of final recommendations. Throughout the project, the team will engage a diverse and knowledgeable community of practitioners to ensure that the defined needs of the assessment toolkit are collaboratively developed by the groups that will employ the final product.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proposed Grant Activities ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An IMLS National Leadership/National Forum Grant will enable stakeholders from a variety of institutions to meet with members of the project team to discuss the issues facing implementation of content reuse assessment, the tools and resources identified in the environmental scan, necessary infrastructure for the toolkit, and next steps towards toolkit development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== About the Toolkit ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ultimate goal of the toolkit will be to provide a roadmap, tools, techniques, and documentation to assess the reuse of materials within a given digital library in order to help libraries plan and deliver content to different user groups. The toolkit will provide analysis of the purpose, strengths, and weaknesses of available tools and allow the user to choose the resources that best fit their assessment needs. Included resources will support the full lifecycle of reuse assessment, from defining goals, assembling vetted tools, and pointing to current studies and research in this area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Project Team ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Genya O’Gara, Virtual Library of Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Kelly, Loyola University New Orleans&lt;br /&gt;
* Martha Kyrilidou, QualityMetrics&lt;br /&gt;
* Caroline Muglia, University of Southern California&lt;br /&gt;
* Ayla Stein, University of Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
* Santi Thompson, University of Houston&lt;br /&gt;
* Liz Woolcott, Utah State University&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Get Involved ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The working group maintains a [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxKlOQm6nnVnRnRyRWJvQ1drbDg?usp=sharing Google Drive folder], which contains meeting notes and drafts of working documents. Our work is also archived using the [https://osf.io/36npw/ Open Science Framework].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any questions, or are interested in participating in the working group, please contact [mailto:sathompson3@uh.edu Santi Thompson]. You can also fill out our [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16X0B-NSulh1V6HuqkSZZq0El35AQlZLbpWUlzNx2Puo/edit User Studies Participant] spreadsheet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
---&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Assessment:User_Studies | Back to the User Studies home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wiki.diglib.org/Assessment Back to the Assessment home page]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Thompsonsa82</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>